COMMUNICATION
dione derivatives b. However, we were aware of some possi-
ble problems with this strategy. For example, the epoxida-
tion of enone a to give c would not be easy owing to the
presence of a bulky hydroxycycloalkyl substituent at the C-3
position. In addition, a mixture of two diastereoisomeric
products of b might be formed if the rearrangement of ep-
oxide c proceeded via competing SN1 and SN2-like processes
(Scheme 1b). Furthermore, under weakly acidic conditions,
a direct semipinacol rearrangement of enone a to form e (as
in Scheme 1a) might take place before epoxidation occur-
red.[6b] Herein, we report the development of this process
and its results.
room temperature to give the expected product 1b with
high stereoselectivity (99% ee) and in 30% yield (Table 1,
entry 1). With this result in hand, our subsequent efforts
were aimed at improving the yield of the rearrangement
step by screening other Brønsted acids. However, neither
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) nor boric acid yielded the expect-
ed product 1b (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). We considered the
possibility that not only a Brønsted acid was required, but
also the presence of water was important in effecting this re-
arrangement, because the presence of a large amount of
water induced this reaction (Table 1, entries 2 and 3).
As we anticipated, when dioxane and water (v/v 1:2) were
used as a mixed solvent, rearrangement of epoxide 1c pro-
ceeded sluggishly with 5% TFA at 508C and gave the prod-
uct 1b in 60% yield after 36 hours (Table 1, entry 4). In-
creasing the amount of TFA to 10 equivalents reduced the
reaction time to 6 hours and enhanced the yield of product
1b to 84% (Table 1, entry 5). Likewise, the use of tetrahy-
drofuran and water as a mixed solvent also effected this re-
arrangement with 99% ee, and in 69% yield (Table 1,
entry 6). Subsequently, we examined other mixed solvents,
such as 1,4-dioxane with dichloromethane or methanol
(Table 1, entries 7 and 8), but no product 1b was observed.
A survey of mixed solvents revealed that water as a co-sol-
vent was essential to this rearrangement reaction. Further-
more, changing the ratio of dioxane/water from 1:1 to 1:3
was examined to find the optimal conditions, and dioxane/
water in a ratio of 1:2 was found to give the best yield.
To further explore the substrate scope and generality of
this one-pot procedure (Scheme 1b), a series of vinylogous
a-ketol substrates, a (prepared through the coupling of vari-
ous enones with cyclobutanone or cyclopentanone deriva-
tives),[12] were subjected to asymmetric epoxidation with
H2O2 followed by in situ acidification in the general process
described below. The results are shown in Table 2. Substitu-
tion at the C-3’ position of the cyclobutanol moiety of sub-
strate 1a with both six- and seven-membered spiro-rings
(Table 2, entries 2 and 3) were effectively converted into the
desired product using this procedure, with comparable
yields of 56% and 60%, respectively. The introduction of
cis-mono-substituents 4-BrC6H4 and Ph at the C-3’ position
(Table 2, entries 4 and 5) led to 3:1 diastereoisomeric mix-
tures of 4b/4b’ and 5b/5b’ in total yields of 55% and 57%,
respectively.
We initially attempted to develop the tandem asymmetric
epoxidation/semipinacol rearrangement of the vinylogous a-
ketol a. However, the reaction of 1a with 2.5 equivalents of
H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O), using amine d as the catalyst, in
the presence of water-stable Lewis acids ScCAHTUNGTRENNNUG
[11]
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
solvents at 358C. Fortunately, the intermediate epoxide 1c
was produced with several solvents, such as 1,4-dioxane, tet-
rahydrofuran, or ethyl acetate. Among these solvents, 1,4-di-
oxane gave the highest ee (98%) and yield (68%).[12] In
these cases, a trace amount of the competing semipinacol re-
arrangement product e was also observed.
Based on the experimental results above, we turned our
attention to promoting the subsequent semipinacol rear-
rangement of epoxide 1c into product 1b so as to accom-
plish a one-pot procedure (Scheme 1b).[13] Thus, epoxide 1c
served as the substrate in a search for appropriate rear-
rangement conditions. We treated 1c with a variety of
Brønsted or Lewis acids in 1,4-dioxane,[14] and the results
(Table 1) indicated that several Lewis acids, such as Mg-
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(ClO4)2, LiClO4·3H2O, AlCl3, and SnCl4, were ineffective in
promoting this rearrangement at 508C. Gratifyingly, when
concentrated hydrochloric acid (4 equiv) was used; however,
the reaction went to completion smoothly within 4 hours at
Table 1. Screening rearrangement conditions from 1c to 1b.[a]
Both major isomers, 4b and 5b, were produced in excel-
lent optical purities (98% ee and 99% ee, respectively).The
absolute configuration of (À)-4b was unambiguously con-
firmed by X-ray crystallography,[15] and, based on this infor-
mation, the absolute configuration of other products 1b–3b
and 5b in Table 2 were deduced. However, trans-mono-sub-
stitution with a phenyl group at the C-3’ position of 1a re-
sulted in poor 1:1 diastereoselectivity and a low total yield
of 40% (Table 2, entry 6). When 3’,3’-diphenyl-substituted
1a was subjected to the reaction conditions, we did not ob-
serve the expected product b, and e was the sole product,
probably owing to steric hindrance caused by the bulky 3’,3’-
diphenyl substitution during the initial epoxidation step.
entry
Solvent
Acid
Yield [%][e]
ee [%][f]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
1,4-dioxane
HCl[b]
TFA[c]
30
n.d.
n.d.
60
84
69
99
–
–
96
99
99
–
boric acid[c]
TFA[d]
1,4-dioxane/water
1,4-dioxane/water
THF/water
1,4-dioxane/CH2Cl2
1,4-dioxane/MeOH
TFA[c]
TFA[c]
TFA[c]
n.d.
n.d.
TFA[c]
–
[a] All Reactions (except entry 1) were performed with 0.1 mmol of ep-
oxide 1c in 1 mL solvent at 508C. [b] 4 equiv acid was added. [c] 10 equiv
acid was added. [d] 0.02 equiv acid was added. [e] Yield of isolated prod-
uct. [f] ee of product 1b was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. THF=
tetrahydrofuran, TFA=trifluoroacetic acid, n.d.=not detected.
2270
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2269 – 2272