398 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 2, 2002
Ma¸kosza et al.
Sch em e 3
was produced via dechlorination of the initial SNAr
product 8. A separate experiment using an authentic
sample of 8 confirmed that the decomposition of this
product readily occurs in basic medium to give 9.
In the absence of a CR-H bond in the σF adduct, no
base catalysis of the SNAr pathway was expected to affect
the VNS/SNAr competition of Scheme 4. As shown in
Figure 5, the VNS/SNAr profile (open circles) fits very
well the simple curvilinear base dependence predicted
by eq 6 with a rapid access to the plateau associated
with the occurrence of a kinetically controlled VNS
process. A most noteworthy feature, however, is that this
plateau corresponds to a much larger predominance of
the VNS reaction, i.e., [PH]/[PF] ∼ 25, than that found in
the reactions of 1d with the secondary carbanion C-2
under the same conditions where [PH]/[PF] ∼ 1.1 was
observed (solid circles).
In this regard, the available evidence is that the
reactivity of C-6 is commonly 3-4 times greater than that
of C-2 in covalent addition processes at C-H ring
positions.21 Since the ring C-H and C-F positions of
1a -d are rather similar in terms of steric demand,22
there is no reason why this relative reactivity should be
modified on going from σH to σF adducts. It follows that
the quite different [PH]/[PF] ratios observed here in the
systems involving C-2 and C-6 must be a consequence
of different rates of the fluoride ion departure, which
appears to be the rate-limiting step in the reaction of C-6.
The possible acceleration of the SNAr reaction of 1d with
C-2 but not that with C-6 by the base reagent is a
reasonable explanation of this observation, although
steric hindrances caused in this step by tertiary C-6 may
also contribute to this effect.
Althought the occurrence of base catalysis in the
SNAr reactions of Schemes 2 and 3 can only be taken into
account within the complicated mathematical formalism
of eq 8, the competitive VNS/SNAr strategysdeveloped
in this work to get a better understanding of the VNS
reactionsremains actually useful for the two following
reasons:
(1) Notwithstanding the fact that it is difficult to
differentiate between the parameters responsible for the
observed variations of the [PH]/[PF] ratio in the low base
region, the initial increase of this ratio with increasing
[B]0 implies necessarily that the rate of the VNS reaction
is accelerated by the base reagent. Thus, the VNS
reaction proceeds with formation of the σH adduct in a
fast equilibrium step that is followed by a rate-limiting
base-catalyzed â-elimination step.
neutral nucleophiles such as secondary amines,18 we are
not aware of works reporting a similar behavior in SNAr
reactions involving anionic nucleophiles, especially car-
banions. Only to be noted is a report by Leffek and
Tremaine that the rate of reaction of 2,4-dinitrofluo-
robenzene with diethyl malonate anion increases regu-
larly with increasing the carbanion concentration.19
However, this phenomenon was not recognized as arising
from base catalysis of the departure of F-.
Why the SNAr reactions of Scheme 3 are subject to
base-catalysis is therefore an interesting question. This
behavior requires two major conditions: (1) ability of the
σF adduct to return to the starting materials, thus some
reversibility of the addition step, i.e., k′ being at least
of the same order of magnitude as k′ ; (2) the hydrogen
-1
2
atom bonded at the CR carbon of σF must be sufficiently
acidic to allow base-promoted elimination of HF. Regard-
ing the first condition, a key point is that we are here
dealing with reactions carried out in DMF, a dipolar
aprotic solvent where the solvation of small ions with a
localized negative charge like F- is rather poor20 while
that of highly delocalized anionic species such as σ-ad-
ducts is very much favored. As a result, fluoride anion
departure of σF may be rather difficult, accounting for k′
comparable to k′ . The fact that the reaction must
2
-1
proceed with replacement of a small fluorine atom by a
bulky nucleophile may also contribute to this inequality.
On the other hand, it seems reasonable to anticipate that
having a base-catalyzed concerted E-2-type breaking of
the CR-HR and C2-F bonds in σF should not be very
different from having the base-catalyzed E-2 elimination
of HCl in the σH adduct.
Th e Rea ction of 1d w ith a Ter tia r y Ca r ba n ion .
Definitive evidence that our reasoning regarding the
course of the SNAr reactions expressed in Scheme 3 is
actually correct was obtained by studying of the reaction
of 1d with the tertiary carbanion C-6 derived from the
deprotonation of 1-chloroethyl phenyl sulfone 6. Since the
low stability of C-6 precluded its use as the excess base
reagent, Scheme 4 was investigated by mixing equimolar
amounts of 1d and 6 in the presence of t-BuOK in a large
excess, a procedure shown to afford reliable results in
the reaction of 1c with C-2 (vide supra). In this reaction,
the VNS products 7 and 9 were formed, and the latter
(2) The plateau at high [B]0 strongly suggests that the
two VNS and SNAr processes are both occurring with
rates independent from the base concentration. In regard
to the VNS, it means that this process is under kinetic
control with a rate-limiting formation of the σH adduct.
Less definite conclusions can be made for the SNAr
reaction. It is also kinetically controlled, the overall
kinetic behavior being identical to the one predicted by
the simple competitive model of Scheme 2, i.e., [PH]/[PF]
) k1/k′ , or it is controlled by the k′ /k′ ratio and the
1
1
-1
(17) Chambers, R. D.; Close, D.; Williams, D. L. H. J . Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1980, 778. Chambers, R. D.; Musgrave, W. K. R.;
Waterhous, J . S.; Williams, D. L. H.; Burdon, J .; Hollyhead, W. B.;
Tatlow, J . C. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 239. Brooke, G.
M. J . Fluorine Chem. 1997, 86, 1.
(18) (a) Reference 5d, pp 46-58. (b) Nudelman, N. S. In The
Chemistry of Amino, Nitroso, Nitro and Related Groups Part 2.
Supplement F2; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1996; p 1215.
(19) Leffek, K. T.; Tremaine, P. H. Can. J . Chem. 1973, 51, 1659.
(20) Vlasov, V. M. J . Fluorine. Chem. 1993, 61, 193.
rate of F- departure k′ . The latter case seems to be
2
working in the reaction of Scheme 4.
Isotop e Effects. The two major conclusions presented
above have been further consolidated by a study of the
(21) Mudryk, B.; Ma¸kosza, M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 209.
(22) Manderville, R. A.; Durst, J . M.; Buncel, E. J . Phys. Org. Chem.
1996, 9, 515.