species, the palladium atom attached to the C2 carbon
potentially has two elimination pathways to follow
(Scheme 1). One gives the syn-β-hydride elimination pro-
ducts, the other gives the anti-β-heteroatom elimination
products.
Table 1. Palladium Catalyzed Ferrier Type C-Glycosylation
with Glycal and Cyclohexenyl Trifluoromethanesulfonatea
Scheme 1. Pd Elimination Pathways of Heck Type C-Glycosy-
lation
entry
catalyst
additive solvent temp (°C) yield (%)b
1c
2c
3c
4b
5
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(TFA)2
N.A.
N.A.
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
80
0
80
0
Pd(PhCN)2Cl2 N.A.
PdCl2(PPh3)2 N.A.
PdCl2(PPh3)2 N.A.
PdCl2(PPh3)2 dpped
PdCl2(PPh3)2 dpppd
PdCl2(PPh3)2 dpppend
PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
80
0
80
32%
46%
0
80
6
80
7
80
53%
0
8
80
9
80
62%
51%
46%
30%
65%
78%
69%
45%
12%
56%
23%
However, almost all of the existing palladium-catalyzed
methods focus on the formation of a CꢀC bond between
the anomeric carbon and the aryl group. To the best of our
knowledge, few palladium catalyzed coupling reactions of
glycals and alkyl groups have been reported. The use of
enol triflates with olefins, in Heck reactions, shows their
potential efficiency as coupling reagents and highlights
their underlying potential in a reaction with glycals.9 In
continuation of our interest in functionalized sugar pyra-
nose, especially glycals,10 herein we report a highly stereo-
selective palladium catalyzed C-glycosylation between gly-
cals and enol triflates.
Initially, the reaction of glucal (1a) and cyclohexenyl
triflate (2a) with palladium acetate as catalyst was carried
out in 1 equiv of triethylamine in dimethylformamide
(DMF) at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 1). Unfortunately, this
reaction could not afford any desired product after 48 h.
Upon screening different palladium catalysts, PdCl2(PPh3)2
was found to give the Ferrier type product (3a) in poor yield
(entry 4) while a catalyst such as Pd(OAc)2 (entry 1),
Pd(TFA)2 (entry 2), or Pd(PhCN)2Cl2 (entry 3) was found
to be ineffective.
10 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NBr
11 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NI
80
80
12 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NOAc DMF
80
13 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
14 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
15 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
16 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
17 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
18 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
19 PdCl2(PPh3)2 nBu4NCl
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMSO
ACN
100
120
135
120
100
120
110
NMP
toluene
a Unless otherwise specified, reactions were carried out with 1 equiv of
1a, 1.5 equiv of 2a, 10% catalyst, 150% additives, and 3 equiv of
triethylamine in a sealed tube for 36 h. b Isolated yield. c 1 equiv of base.
d Ligand added in 40 mol %. dppe: 1,2-diphenylphosphinoethene; dppp:
1,3-diphenylphosphinopropane; dpppen: 1,5-diphenylphosphenopentane.
was not necessary (entries 6ꢀ8) but a tetrabutylammo-
nium salt could enhance the yield significantly.12 Tetra-
butylammonium salts with different anions were further
tested, and it was found that tetrabutylammonium chlo-
ride afforded the desired product in the highest yield (entries
9ꢀ12). Gratifyingly, increasing the reaction temperatures
to 120 °C (entries 13ꢀ14) led to the Ferrier type product
exclusively in good yield within an acceptable period of
time. However, any further increase of temperature low-
ered the yield (entry 15). Several solvents were tested, but
DMF was found to afford the desired product with the
highest yield (entries 14, 16ꢀ18).
Next, we proceeded to screen various organic and
inorganic bases, and triethylamine was found to be the
most effective for mediating this process.11 In addition, 3
equiv of base were found to give a much higher yield of
product 3a (entry 5). Investigation of various additives and
ligands revealed that addition of ligands to the reaction
With the optimal reaction conditions identified, we
studied the substrate scope of this reaction, and the results
are summarized in Table 2. First, glycals with different
protecting groups were tested for their reactivities toward
the cyclohexenyl triflate. Among the protecting groups
surveyed, only good leaving groups such as acetyl (3a, 3d),
pivaloyl (3c, 3f) and ethoxycarbonyloxyl (3b, 3e) were
found to be reactive under standard conditions. Among
them, ethoxycarbonyl-protected glycals gave the desired
(9) (a) Vallin, K. S. A.; Larhed, M.; Johansson, K.; Hallberg, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4537. (b) Scott, W. J.; Pena, M. R.; Sward, K.;
Stoessel, S. J.; Stille, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2302. (c) Kaukoranta,
€
€
P.; Kallstrom, K.; Andersson, P. G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2595.
ꢀ
ꢁ
(d) Mata, Y.; Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 3296.
(10) (a) Gorityala, B. K.; Lorpitthaya, R.; Bai, Y. G.; Liu, X.-W.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 5844. (b) Lorpitthaya, R.; Xie, Z. Z.; Sophy, K. B.;
Kuo, J. L.; Liu, X.-W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 588. (c) Ma, J. M.; Zhao,
Y. Y.; Ng, S.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, J.; Than, A.; Chen, P.; Liu, X.-W.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4533. (d) Cai, S.; Kishan Gorityala, B.; Ma, J.;
Leow, M. L.; Liu, X.-W. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1072. (e) Lorpitthaya, R.;
Xie, Z.-Z.; Kuo, J.-L.; Liu, X.-W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1561. (e)
Gorityala, B. K.; Cai, S.; Lorpitthaya, R.; Ma, J.; Pasunooti, K. K.; Liu,
X.-W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 676.
(12) (a) Liu, Y.; Yao, B.; Deng, C.-L.; Tang, R.-Y.; Zhang, X.-G.; Li,
J.-H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1126. (b) Mariampillai, B.; Herse, C.; Lautens,
M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4745.
(11) For the selection of base, see Supporting Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 20, 2011
5649