acrylates and styrenes. Glorius8a and Bergman and
Ellman11 reported the only two examples of Rh(III)-
catalyzedolefination using unactivatedolefins. In Bergman
and Ellman’s report,11 various unactuvated alkenes such as
1-hexene are smoothly coupled with O-methyl oximines.
We now report a general method of Rh(III)-catalyzed oxi-
dative olefination of the sulfonamides of 1-naphthylamine
at the peri position using activated and unactivated alkenes.
Although the sulfonamide group can act as a directing
group in facilitating CÀH activation, only very limited
examples have been reported.12 In this context, given that
sulfonamide groups can be readily installed and removed,
it is important to explore this type of substrate for selective
CÀH activation. We initiated our investigation on the
oxidative olefination of N-(1-naphthyl)sulfonamide 1a
with benzyl acrylate. Our initial screening indicated that
the coupled product 3aa was isolated in 70% yield when a
combination of [RhCp*Cl2]2 (2.5 mol %) and Cu(OAc)2
(2.1 equiv) was used in DCE (120 °C). Replacing the
solvent with DMF resulted in significant decomposition
under the same conditions. Gratifyingly, by lowering the
temperature to 100 °C, a clean reaction was achieved and
3aa was isolated in 89% yield (Scheme 1). Notably, no
silver salt additive is necessary under these conditions.
This product was characterized as a five-membered
azacycle as a result of olefination followed by intramo-
lecular hydroamination.7a,10a,10b,13
readily coupled with 1a to afford the cyclization products
in high yields (87À90%). In addition, both electron-donat-
ing (3cc and 3dc) and -withdrawing (3bb) groups in the
naphthyl ring are well tolerated. Furthermore, no Heck-
type product was generated for a halogen-functionalized
substrate (see 3bb). This specific feature highlights an
advantage of Rh(III)-catalyzed CÀC coupling reactions
compared to many palladium-catalyzed ones in that the
halogen is retained. In addition, other activated olefins
such as acrylonitrile and enones are all efficient coupling
partners. Thus, all the coupled products were isolated in
comparably high yields (87À95%) for all monosulfona-
mides examined. In contrast, only unidentifiable products
were isolated when PhNHTs was used as a substrate under
the same conditions. CÀH activation at both the ortho and
peri position of 1-substituted naphthalenes has been noted
using rhodium and palladium catalysts.14 To better define
the substrate scope, a centrosymmetric disulfonamide has
been applied. Although two equivalents of olefin were
oxidatively incorporated, NMR analyses indicated that
monocyclization occurred. Thus, products 3fb and 3fc
were isolated in good yields. In these reactions, failure of
the second hydroamination is likely caused by the change
of electronic effects induced by the first cyclization.
The scope of the olefin was successfully expanded.
Simple styrene and 4-chlorostyrene readily coupled with
1a to give products 4a (93%) and 4b (82%), respectively
(Scheme 2). Significantly, unactivated simple olefins such
as 1-hexene, vinylcyclohexane, and 4-methyl-1-pentene are
also efficient coupling partners, and all the coupled pro-
ducts were isolated in high yield (72À93%). In line with the
scope of sulfonamides in their coupling with acrylates,
both electron-donating and halide substituents in the
naphthyl ring can be tolerated, indicating the general
applicability of the sulfonamide substrate. We noted that
only two reports deals with rhodium-catalyzed oxidative
olefination using unactivated alkenes.8a,11
Scheme 1. Oxidative Olefination Using Activated Alkenesa,b
(9) (a) Guimond, N.; Gorelsky, S. I.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 6449. (b) Tsai, A. S.; Tauchert, M. E.; Bergman, R. G.;
Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1248. (c) Li, Y.; Li, B.-J.;
Wang, W.-H.; Huang, W.-P.; Zhang, X.-S.; Chen, K.; Shi, Z.-J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2115. (d) Gong, T.-J.; Xiao, B.; Liu, Z.-J.; Wan,
J.; Xu, J.; Luo, D.-F.; Fu, Y.; Liu, L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3235. (e) Park,
S. H.; Kim, J. Y.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2372.
(10) (a) Wang, F.; Song, G.; Li, X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5430. (b)
Wang, F.; Song, G.; Du, Z.; Li, X. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2926. (c)
Chen, J.; Song, G.; Pan, C.-L.; Li, X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5426.
(11) Tsai, A. S.; Brasse, M.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 540.
(12) (a) Dai, H.-X.; Stepan, A. F.; Plummer, M. S.; Zhang, Y.-H.;
Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7222. (b) Youn, S. W.; Bihn, J. H.;
Kim, B. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3738. (c) Miura, M.; Tsuda, T.; Pivsa-Art,
S.; Nomura, M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5211.
(13) (a) Zhu, C.; Falck, J. R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1214. (b) Li, J.-J.;
Mei, T.-S.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6452. (c) Lu, Y.;
Wang, D.-H.; Engle, K. M.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5916.
(d) Willwacher, J.; Rakshit, S.; Glorius, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9,
4736.
a Conditions: sulfonamide (0.5 mmol), alkene (0.75 mmol),
[RhCp*Cl2]2 (0.0125 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 (1.05 mmol), DMF (3 mL),
100 °C, 16 h, under N2, isolated yield. b 2a = benzyl acrylate, 2b =
n-butyl acrylate, 2c = tert-butyl acrylate, 2d = acrylonitrile, 2e =
1-penten-3-one. c Conditions: sulfonamide (0.5 mmol), alkene (1.5 mmol),
[RhCp*Cl2]2 (0.0125 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 (2.1 mmol), DMF (3 mL), 100 °C,
18 h, under N2, isolated yield.
(14) (a) Kim, B. S.; Jang, C.; Lee, D. J.; Youn, S. W. Chem. Asian J.
2010, 5, 2336. (b) Mochida, S.; Shimizu, M.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.;
Miura, M. Chem. Asian J. 2010, 5, 847. (c) Chen, X.; Li, J.-J.; Hao, X.-S.;
Goodhue, C. E.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 78. (d) Kaım,
¨
With these optimized conditions in hand, we first ex-
amined the scope of activated olefins in their coupling with
N-(1-naphthyl)sulfonamides (Scheme 1). Several acrylates
L. E.; Gamez-Montano, R.; Grimaud, L.; Ibarra-Riverab, T. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 1350. (e) Harayama, T.; Sato, T.; Hori, A.; Abeand, H.;
Takeuchi, Y. Synthesis 2004, 9, 1446.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 21, 2011
5809