We have utilized these classes of sulfonate esters as plat-
forms for the design of protecting groups that can be
removed under specific conditions. In particular, we found
that the incorporation of an acetoxy group into trifluoro-
methylbenzyl (TFMB) sulfonate esters maintained stability
to nucleophiles but rendered these groups highly labile to
esterase activity (Figure 1).4
N-methylated and sulfonated to afford 3.7a Diazonium
coupling yielded 4, and subsequent acid-catalyzed conden-
sation of this arylazo compound with a m-aminophenol13
yielded the sulfonated dye 22, which exhibits maximal
absorption at 673 nm and emission at 689 nm in phos-
phate-buffered saline (PBS).
While this approach was facile for the small dansyl
fluorophore, it was unclear whether the AcOTFMB group
could be incorporated into near-IR dyes, which are con-
siderably larger and more challenging to synthesize. Here
we report the successful synthesis of oxazine near-IR
fluorophores bearing AcOTFMB esterase-labile sulfonate
esters. We demonstrate that these dyes are chemically
stable but are readily cleaved to the free sulfonate by
esterase activity, while the corresponding TFMB esters
are unaffected.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of a Sulfonated Oxazine Dye
With this sulfonated near-IR fluorophore in hand, the
next synthetic challenge was determining how and when to
incorporate the TFMB and AcOTFMB sulfonate esters.
Our initial attempts to directly introduce TFMB and
AcOTFMB sulfonate esters into 22 by formation and
reaction of the sulfonyl chloride were unsuccessful. We
therefore installed the sulfonate esters into the dye pre-
cursors (Scheme 2). Thus, the sodium sulfonate salt 3 was
converted into the allylic sulfonyl chloride 5 and subse-
quently treated with the corresponding alcohol and Et3N
at 0 °C to afford the sulfonate esters 6 and 7.
The sulfonate esters 6 and 7 were stable to diazonium
coupling conditions in acidic aqueous methanol to afford 8
and 9. Subsequent acid-catalyzed condensation of 8 with
N-ethyl-7-hydroxy-tetrahydroquinoline yielded the de-
sired TFMB-protected sulfonated oxazine 23. However,
the standard oxazine dye-formation conditions of HCl in
hot aqueous ethanol led to substantial deprotection of
AcOTFMB, presumably because carboxylic esters are
labile to these conditions. Gratifyingly, dye formation in
hot acetic acid readily afforded the desired oxazine dye 24
with the AcOTFMB sulfonate ester intact (Scheme 2).
To facilitate the synthesis of more dyes containing
a protected sulfonate, we constructed TFMB and
AcOTFMB-protected iodopropyl sulfonates 11 and 13
(Scheme 3). Treatment of 3-chlorosulfonyl chloride with
the corresponding alcohols and Et3N at 0 °C yielded the
respective chloropropyl sulfonates 10 and 12. The chlor-
ides were then selectively displaced with iodides. These
compounds are especially notable because (1) their synth-
esis clearly demonstrates the remarkable stability of
TFMB and AcOTFMB sulfonates to nucleophilic attack
(chloro is displaced selectively even after overnight reflux
with excess iodide) and (2) the iodide 13 can allow the
introduction of an AcOTFMB-protected sulfonate into
molecules with a suitable nucleophile, avoiding the need
for sulfonation.
Figure 1. Esterase-labile protecting groups for sulfonates. Yellow-
green fluorescent AcOTFMB dansyl sulfonate esters are stable
to nucleophilic attack due to the electron-withdrawing proper-
ties of the trifluoromethyl group. The acetoxy trigger can be
readily removed by esterase activity. Subsequent rapid 1,
6-elimination affords the blue-fluorescent dansyl sulfonate anion.
Examples of sulfonated near-IR fluorophores include
cyanines,6 oxazines,7 and some rhodamine8 and BODIPY9
derivatives. Among these dye classes, near-IR oxazines
have the advantages of a compact structure, excitation and
bright fluorescence in the 650À700 nm region,10 and high
photostability.11 To determine whether the AcOTFMB
protection strategy was amenable to this class of near-IR
fluorophores, we first synthesized the sulfonated oxazine
dye 22 as shown in Scheme 1. Reaction of m-anisidine with
acetone to form the dihydroquinoline 1 was facile in the
presence of 2 mol % In(OTf)3.12 This product was then
(6) Mujumdar, R. B.; Ernst, L. A.; Mujumdar, S. R.; Lewis, C. J.;
Waggoner, A. S. Bioconjugate Chem. 1993, 4, 105–111.
(7) (a) Zilles, A.; Arden-Jacob, J.; Drexhage, K.-H.; Kemnitzer, N. U.;
Hamers-Schneider, M. US 2006/0179585 A1, 2006. (b) Toutchkine, A. WO
2009/152024 A1, 2009.
(8) Kolmanov, K.; Belov, V. N.; Bierwagen, J.; Ringemann, C.;
Muller, V.; Eggeling, C.; Hell, S. W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 158–166.
(9) Niu, S. L.; Ullrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Kiss, A.; Renard, P.-Y.;
Romieu, A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2049–2052.
(10) (a) Hintersteiner, M.; Enz, A.; Frey, P.; Jaton, A.-L.; Kinzy, W.;
Kneuer, R.; Neumann, U.; Rudin, M.; Staufenbiel, M.; Stoeckli, M.;
Wiederhold, K.-H.; Gremlich, H.-U. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 577–583.
(b) Wakata, A.; Lee, H.-M.; Rommel, P.; Toutchkine, A.; Schmidt, M.;
Lawrence, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1578–1582.
(11) Eggeling, C.; Widengren, J.; Brand, L.; Schaffer, J.; Felekyan, S.;
Seidel, C. A. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 2979–2995.
(12) Theoclitou, M.-E.; Robinson, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
3907–3910.
(13) Kanitz, A.; Hartmann, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 923–930.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 23, 2011
6197