5244
T. S. Goebel et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 5241–5244
Conclusion
A
It has been discovered that substituted thiourea with two- and
three-points of hydrogen bonding displays a high affinity for inor-
ganic phosphate. 1H NMR studies indicate that not only can deriv-
atized thiourea molecules bind phosphate, but also the addition of
neighboring amino moiety can induce a three point hydrogen
bonding interaction.
Based on the high affinity of derivatized thiourea for inorganic
phosphate, polymer flocculants were substituted with a thiourea-
trapping group and sequestration studies discovered that up to
60% of inorganic phosphate could be removed from the solution.
The polymer flocculants were able to remove the phosphate sorbed
to the kaolinite through the flocculation event as well as remove an
additional portion from the solution. These newly derived thiourea
polymer flocculants worked up to 45% better than currently avail-
able commercial products in the removal of inorganic phosphate
from water.
B
Acknowledgments
T.A.D. would like to thank the Department of Chemistry, Office
of Research, and the College of Arts & Sciences at Idaho State Uni-
versity for generous start-up funds. DSC-TGA-MS was purchased
through funding from NSF (NSF CHE-1048714). T.S.G. would like
to thank Dr. Casey Carrothers for insightful input.
‘‘Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publi-
cation is solely for the purpose of providing specific information
and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.’’
‘‘The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimi-
nation in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color,
national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital
status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part
of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance
program.’’
Figure 3. (A) Phosphate (H2POÀ) removed by polymers with an initial phosphate
concentration of 5 mg/L, and (B) the same results with the phosphate removed by
kaolinite partitioned to examine the portion removed by the polymers.
4
from the solution. To further examine the results from the polymer
treatment in this experiment the amount of phosphate removed by
kaolinite was partitioned and removed to look at what portion of
the phosphate left in solution bound to the polymers (Fig. 3B). Fig-
ure 3B suggests that the addition of Magnifloc 494C did not de-
crease the amount of phosphate in the solution. Comparing the
results from Magnifloc 494C and C40-00 shows a decrease in phos-
phate concentration related to increasing the positive charge den-
sity on the polymer from 10% to 40%, suggesting that a positively
charged quaternary ammonium group is interacting with the phos-
phate in the solution. Comparing the amount of phosphate re-
moved from the solution when C40-00 was added to the addition
of C40-20(2-pt) suggests that the addition of the thiourea group in-
creased the polymers’ sorption of phosphate. C40-20(3-pt) showed
little improvement over the control C40-00.
While the monomers of the two-point and three-point thio-
ureas displayed similar bonding to phosphate in the NMR studies,
the polymer studies showed a difference in the amount of phos-
phate removed from the solution (2-pt vs 3-pt). The difference
likely lies in the interaction of the thiourea (2-pt or 3-pt) portion
of the polymer with the solid material present (kaolinite). The
two-point thiourea polymer would likely not interact with the neg-
atively charged clay surface as strongly as the three-point thiourea.
The three-point thiourea polymer has an additional site (free
amine) for interaction with the solid material thus decreasing the
availability of the trapping group for the phosphate in the solution.
Due to the higher affinity of the three-point thiourea polymer with
the surface, the amount of phosphate removed through the floccu-
lation event is decreased. These experiments are currently under
investigation and will be reported in due course.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Correll, D. L. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27, 261–266.
2. Linton, B.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6027–6038.
3. Kelly, T. R.; Kim, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7072–7080.
4. Hay, B. J.; Firman, T. K.; Moyer, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1810–1819.
5. Zafar, A.; Melendez, R.; Geib, S. J.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 683–
690.
6. Gunnlaugsson, T.; Kruger, P. E.; Jensen, P.; Tierney, J.; Ali, H. D. P.; Hussey, G. M.
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10875–10878.
7. Jose, D. A.; Kumar, D. K.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3445–3448.
8. Cho, E. J.; Ryu, B. J.; Lee, Y. J.; Nam, K. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2607–2609.
9. Pfeffer, F. M.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Jensen, P.; Kruger, P. E. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5357–
5360.
10. Perez-Casas, C.; Yatsimirsky, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2275–2284.
11. Jose, D.; Kumar, D.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3445–3448.
12. Pfeffer, F.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Jensen, P.; Kruger, P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5357–5360.
13. dos Santos, C. M. G.; McCabe, T.; Watson, G. W.; Kruger, P. E.; Gunnlaugsson, T.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9235–9244.
14. Kugimiya, A.; Taki, H. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 606, 252–256.
15. Kugimiya, A.; Taki, H. Anal. Lett. 2008, 41, 302–311.
16. (a) Elsabee, M. Z.; Naguib, H. F.; Mikhael, M. G.; Sabaa, M. W.; Furuhata, K.
Macromolecules 1991, 24, 1962–1968; (b) Elsabee, M. Z.; Sabaa, M. W.; Naguib,
H. F.; Mikhael, M. G. Polym. Bull. 1989, 22, 143–149; (c) El-Sonbati, A. Z.; Abd El-
Moiz, A. B.; Hassanein, A. M. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1995, 48, 35–44.