The HREIMS of gonytolide B (2) (m/z 638.1613 [Mþ])
gave the molecular formula, C32H30O14, which was iden-
tical to that of 1. The 13C NMR spectrum (150 MHz,
CDCl3) of 2 showed two sets of 16 signals (C-2ꢀC-15 and
C-20ꢀC-150, respectively), and the chemical shifts of each
signal set were nearly identical to those of 1 (Table S1,
Supporting Information). The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 was
also similar to that of 1 (Table S2, Supporting Infor-
mation). As a result, compound 2 was composed of two
chromanone moieties, subunits I in the structure of 1,
which were bonded asymmetrically. The correlations of
C-2ꢀC-15 were the same as those observed for 1 in the
HMBC spectrum of 2, indicating that the subunit I was
linked to the other subunit through the quaternary carbon
C-8 (Figure 3). On the other hand, the HMBC correlations
of the C-50 phenolic proton (δH 11.72) to C-40a, C-50 and
C-60; H-80 to C-60 and C-80a; and H3-14 to C-60, C-70 and
C-80 suggested that another subunit I was connected to the
other one through the quaternary carbon C-60, and the
planner structure of 2 was thereby elucidated. Because
only a small amount of 2 was isolated, it was difficult
to carry out its chemical conversion and characterize
its stereochemistry. However, compounds 1 and 2 are
likely biosynthesized by the same pathway, suggesting
that the absolute configuration of 2 may be the same as
that of 1.
Information). Recently, racemic 3 was synthesized12 as the
intermediate compound in a process for the synthesis of
(()-blennolide C.13
We evaluated the promoting activities of 1ꢀ3 on Dro-
sophila innate immune response using the ex vivo Droso-
phila culture system.6 Gonytolide A (1), at up to 1 μg/mL
dosage, showed immune response-promoting activity, and
10 μg/mL of 1 increased to more than 4.5 times of the
Drosophila innate immune response (Figure 4). On the
other hand, compounds 2 and 3 showed no activity at 10
μg/mL (Figure S2, Supporting Information). These find-
ings indicated that the linkage of the two chromanone
moieties (e.g., subunit I) through C-8 and C-80 is important
for innate immune-promoting activity.
Figure 4. Effect of gonytolide A (1) on DAP-type peptidogly-
cans-mediated activation of Drosophila Dpt-lacZ. DAP-type
peptidoglycans-mediated activation of Dpt-lacZ (0) and Dro-
sophila S2 cell viability (b) are represented as the percent relative
to the control (DMSO). The bars indicate the standard errors of
three independent measurements. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs
control (DMSO).
The Drosophila IMD signaling pathway resembles the
mammalian TNF-R signaling pathway.2,14 The TNF-R
signaling pathway plays a critical role in the host defense
against several pathogens, the intrinsic tumor suppression,
and the inflammatory response by producing costimula-
tory molecules, cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion mo-
lecules, through activation of NF-κB. We investigated the
effectof gonytolide A (1) on TNF-R-stimulatedproduction
of IL-8, a neutrophil chemotactic factor, in human umbi-
lical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). As shown in Figure
5, 10μg/mL of compound1 increased the production of IL-
8 by 70%. Thus, compound 1 promoted the innate immune
response through the mammalian TNF-R signaling path-
way as well as through the Drosophila IMD pathway.
To reveal the structural requirements of gonytolide A (1)
for the innate immune-promoting activity, we synthesized
several derivatives by using natural gonytolide A (1).
Treatment of 1 with sulfuryl chloride produced 6,60-di-
chlorinated derivative 6 (Scheme 2). Methylation of 1 by
trimethylsilyldiazomethane in the presence of DIPEA
Figure 3. Planar structure of gonytolide B (2).
The HREIMS of gonytolide C (3) (m/z 320.0871 [Mþ])
gave the molecular formula, C16H16O7, which was equiva-
lent to a half of molecular formula of 1 (C32H30O14) plus
1
one hydrogen atom. The H and 13C NMR spectra of 3
were nearly identical to those of 1, although the signal of
H-8 (δ 6.38) emerged in the 1H NMR of 3 (Tables S1 and
S2, Supporting Information). These facts indicated that
compound 3 was a monomeric unit of 1. The absolute
configuration of 3 was determined by applying the same
transformation as was used to determine the absolute
configuration of 1 (Scheme S1 and Figure S1, Supporting
(9) Kikuchi, H.; Sekiya, M.; Katou, Y.; Ueda, K.; Kabeya, T.;
Kurata, S.; Oshima, Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1693–1695.
(10) Sekiya, M.; Ueda, K.; Okazaki, K.; Terashima, J.; Katou, Y.;
Kikuchi, H.; Kurata, S.; Oshima, Y Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011,
in press. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2011.05.001.
€
(13) Zhang, W.; Krohn, K.; Zia-Ullah; Florke, U.; Pescitelli, G.; Di
(11) Trost, B. M.; Balletire, J. L.; Godleski, S.; McDougal, P. G.;
Balkovec, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2370–2374.
(12) Qin, T.; Johnson, P.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 1714–1717.
ꢀ
Bari, L.; Antus, S.; Kurtan, T.; Rheinheimer, J.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4913–4923.
(14) Silverman, N.; Maniatis, T. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2321–42.
4626
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011