Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Information) and also afforded amine 5a with higher
diastereo- and enantioselectivity (entries 1–6). Gratifyingly,
catalyst 2 f, which contains the unusual 2,5-ditrifluoromethyl-
benzene substitution in the 3,3’-position of the backbone,[14]
afforded an excellent d.r. of 99:1 and an e.r. of 94:6 (entry 6).
Furthermore, solvent screening revealed MTBE to be opti-
mal, affording the amine product with an almost perfect e.r. of
> 99:1 (entry 7). In the absence of molecular sieves (MS), the
reaction becomes slower and partial hydrolysis of the imine is
observed, while the diastereo- and enantioselectivity remain
identical (entry 8). Compared to 5 ꢀ MS, Amberlite CG-50
resin under the standard reaction condition gave similar
results (entry 9), thus suggesting that 5 ꢀ MS may trap the
ammonia byproduct, thereby enhancing catalyst turnover.
With the optimal conditions in hand, we next began
investigating the substrate scope of the enantioselective
butyl-substituted imine 1c provided secondary amine 5c in
79% yield and with a d.r. of 99:1 and an e.r. of 99.6:0.4.
Substrates with electron-withdrawing para substituents, such
as fluorine, chlorine, or trifluoromethyl groups, could also be
used, furnishing products 5e–5g with uniformly superb
diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity. Substitutions at
the meta position are equally well tolerated and both
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups provided
the corresponding secondary amines in good yields and with
remarkably high diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity
(products 5h–5j). Substrates with m-methyl and m-trifluor-
omethyl groups (1h, 1j) were less reactive and required
longer reaction time. o-Fluoro-substituted imine 1k also
reacted more slowly and provided secondary amine 5k in
49% yield and with a d.r. of 19:1 and an e.r. of 98:2. m,p-
Disubstitution led to similar results (product 5l). Interest-
À
À
reductive condensation of N H imines (Table 2).
ingly, the 2-naphthyl N H imine afforded amine product 5m
À
A variety of N H imines efficiently underwent the
in good yield and with a d.r. of 99:1 and an e.r. of 99.7:0.3. A
heterocyclic substrate, pyridine derivative 1n, efficiently
underwent the reductive condensation to afford the corre-
sponding secondary amine 5n in 90% yield and with a d.r. of
99:1 and an e.r. of 98.5:1.5. This result further underscores the
remarkable base tolerance of our reaction. Unfortunately, the
reductive condensation in the presence of disulfonimide 2 f
(5.0 mol%) to afford the corresponding C2-symmetric secon-
dary amines in good yields and with outstanding diastereo-
and enantioselectivity. Electron-donating para substituents
are well tolerated (products 5b–5d). For example, p-tert-
À
corresponding phenyl,ethyl-substituted N H imine and an
À
aliphatic cyclohexyl,methyl-substituted N H imine did not
react to the desired product.
Table 2: Substrate scope.[a]
Preliminary studies towards applying the newly available
C2-symmetric secondary amines in asymmetric synthesis, in
which they were used as a lithium amide base in a benchmark
enol silane synthesis, and as part of a new phosphoramidite
ligand for use in the asymmetric addition of arylboron
reagents to acyclic enones,[15] confirmed their promise. Both
reactions investigated gave results comparable to analogous
known transformations.[16]
We currently envision a catalytic cycle that is initiated by
the protonation of imine 1a by chiral DSI-2 f (Scheme 1). The
resulting iminium ion pair A undergoes reaction with
Hantzsch dihydropyridine 3 to give enantiomerically enriched
primary amine salt B and the corresponding Hantzsch
pyridine. Subsequently, amine B undergoes a transimination
with substrate 1a, first to produce aminal C, which then
[a] Reactions run on 0.25 mmol scale. The e.r. was determined by HPLC.
The d.r. was determined by GC, NMR, or LC analysis. The absolute
configurations of 5a, ent-5a, and 5d were determined by comparing
known optical rotation values (see the Supporting Information).
[b] Using (S)-DSI-2 f. [c] 48 h. [d] 72 h.
Scheme 1. Proposed catalytic cycle.
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
2
These are not the final page numbers!