The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
ARTICLE
acetate = 3:1, v/v) to afford 1.16 g of compound 4a as a pale
yellow solid in 59.0% yield. H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6,
naphthaleneꢀH), 8.35 (s, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 7.72 (t, J = 8.0
Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 7.55ꢀ7.51 (m, 2H, phenylꢀH),
7.48ꢀ7.44 (m, 3H, phenylꢀH), 7.41ꢀ7.35 (m, 4H, phenylꢀH),
7.32ꢀ7.27 (m, 3H, phenylꢀH), 6.88ꢀ6.84 (m, 3H, dCH,
phenylꢀH), 6.27 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, dCH), 3.78 (s, 3H,
ꢀOCH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ 164.56,
163.99, 159.40, 154.01, 144.23, 136.00, 135.63, 131.95, 131.06,
129.91, 129.35, 128.91, 128.78, 128.70, 128.59, 128.49, 128.44,
128.00, 126.73, 126.38, 122.91, 122.77, 122.46, 116.78, 115.21,
113.76, 85.13, 55.30. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ Calcd. for
(C34H23NO4), 510.1705, found: 510.1713.
Synthesis of 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-2H-benzo-
[h]chromene (NP). In a 50 mL three-necked flask, equipped
with a DeanꢀStark apparatus, naphthalen-1-ol (1.0 g, 6.9 mmol),
propargyl alcohol derivative 5 (2.2 g, 9.2 mmol) and aluminum
oxide (10.0 g) were mixed in toluene (40 mL). The reaction
mixture was refluxed under argon for 9 h. After cooling, the
resulting mixture was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with
dichloromethane (100 mL ꢁ 3). Then the filtrate and the
scrubbing solution were combined. After concentration, the
compound was purified by column chromatography on silica
(petroleum ether:dichloromethane = 5:1, v/v) to afford 210 mg
of pale yellow solid in 8.4% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
d6, ppm): δ 8.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, phenylꢀH), 7.82 (d, J = 8.0
Hz, 1H, phenylꢀH), 7.57ꢀ7.48 (m, 4H, phenylꢀH), 7.44ꢀ7.41
(m, 3H, phenylꢀH), 7.34 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, phenylꢀH),
7.30ꢀ7.23 (m, 2H, phenylꢀH), 6.90ꢀ6.84 (m, 3H, phenylꢀH,
dCH), 6.49 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, dCH), 3.69 (s, 3H, ꢀCH3).
13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 163.75, 152.06, 150.40,
142.04, 139.31, 133.46, 133.37, 132.99, 132.77, 132.53, 131.71,
131.27, 131.17, 129.83, 129.19, 128.64, 126.51, 125.74, 120.98,
118.82, 87.44, 60.26. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ Calcd. for
(C26H20O2), 365.1542, found: 365.1537.
1
ppm): δ 8.53 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH),
8.47 (dd, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 8.36 (d,
J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 7.76 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, naphtha-
leneꢀH), 7.16 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 4.02 (t, J =
7.4 Hz, 2H, ꢀNCH2ꢀ), 1.64ꢀ1.58 (m, 2H, ꢀNCH2CH2ꢀ),
1.39ꢀ1.30 (m, 2H, ꢀCH2CH3), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, ꢀCH2-
CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 163.59, 162.92,
160.17, 133.45, 131.02, 129.09, 128.78, 125.49, 122.31, 121.74,
112.55, 109.89, 40.12, 29.70, 19.78, 13.68. HRMS-ESI (m/z):
[M ꢀ H]ꢀ Calcd. for (C16H15NO3), 268.0974, found: 268.0978.
Synthesis of 4-Hydroxy-N-phenyl-1,8-naphthalimide (4b).
A mixture of 4-methoxy-N-phenyl-1,8-naphthalimide 3b (1.50 g,
4.90 mmol) and 57% (v/v) hydroiodic acid (60 mL) was refluxed
under argon for 15 h. After cooling, the resulting mixture was
filtered, then the crude product was washed with water (50 mL ꢁ
3) to afford 0.90 g of yellow-green solid. The product was directly
used without further purification for the next step.
Synthesis of 5-Butyl-10-(4-methoxyphenyl)-10-phenylbenzo-
[de]pyrano[2,3-g]isoquinoline-4,6(5H,10H)-dione (Nip1). In a
50 mL three-necked flask, equipped with a DeanꢀStark apparatus,
4-hydroxy-N-butyl-1,8-naphthalimide 4a (700 mg, 2.6 mmol), pro-
pargyl alcohol derivative 5 (834 mg, 3.5 mmol), and aluminum
oxide (7.00 g) were mixed in toluene (25 mL). The reaction
mixture was refluxed under argon for 5 h. After cooling, the result-
ing mixture was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with di-
chloromethane (50 mL ꢁ 3). Then the filtrate and the scrubbing
solution were combined. After concentration, the compound was
purified by column chromatography on silica (petroleum ether:di-
chloromethane = 1:4, v/v) to give crude product, then recrystal-
lized from ethanol to afford 360 mg of compound Nip1 as a pale
yellow solid in 28.3% yield. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm):
δ 8.61 (dd, J1 = 8.4 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 8.56 (dd,
J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 8.33 (s, 1H,
naphthaleneꢀH), 7.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH),
7.49ꢀ7.47 (m, 2H, phenylꢀH), 7.41ꢀ7.35 (m, 4H, phenylꢀH),
7.34ꢀ7.32 (m, 1H, phenylꢀH), 6.89ꢀ6.84 (m, 3H, dCH,
phenylꢀH), 6.27 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, dCH), 4.17 (t, J = 7.6
Hz, 2H, ꢀNCH2ꢀ), 3.79 (s, 3H, ꢀOCH3), 1.74ꢀ1.66 (m, 2H,
ꢀCH2CH2ꢀ), 1.47ꢀ1.41 (m, 2H, ꢀCH2CH2ꢀ), 0.98 (t, J = 7.2
Hz, 3H, ꢀCH2CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm):
δ 164.37, 163.84, 159.36, 153.63, 144.28, 136.06, 131.48, 130.67,
129.49, 128.75, 128.44, 128.39, 128.32, 127.93, 126.71, 126.25,
122.71, 122.51, 116.62, 115.25, 113.72, 84.98, 55.27, 40.08, 30.25,
20.38, 13.86. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ Calcd. for
(C32H27NO4), 490.2018, found: 490.2018.
’ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis. Naphthopyrans always play a great role in the
manufacture of ophthalmic lenses. Generally, this important appli-
cation requires that photochromic compounds possess several spe-
cific characteristics: (i) large optical density andneutral color range,
that is, the absorption spectra in the colored form almost cover the
wholevisiblespectrum, (ii) fastphotoresponse, and(iii) rapidcolor
fading rate. However, these preconditions cannot concur in tradi-
tional 2H-naphtho[1,2-b]pyrans, which always possess relatively
large optical density and neutral color range, but unfavorable fading
rate synchronously. Evans et al. reported a general method for
realizing fast and synchronizing photochromic switching for photo-
chromic dyes including naphthoprans.4c,d To further develop the
photochromic properties of naphthopyran derivatives, a naphtha-
limide unit with different N-substituted imide groups was incorpo-
rated. As illustrated in Scheme 3, the target compounds Nip1 and
Nip2 were synthesized by Claisen rearrangement of propargyl-aryl
ethers prepared from 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide (4), which was
synthesized from the raw material of 4-bromo-1,8-naphthalic
anhydride (1) via three steps (imidation, Williamson ether con-
densation, and Zeisel ether cleavage). The reference compound
NP was directly prepared by α-naphthol and propargyl alcohol
derivative 5. Notably, using excess acidic Al2O3 as a catalyst,13 the
synthesis in the Claisen rearrangement of propargyl-aryl ethers
could become straightforward with an easy purification and pref-
erable yield. Their chemical structures were well confirmed by
Synthesis of 10-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5,10-diphenylbenzo-
[de]pyrano[2,3-g]isoquinoline-4,6(5H,10H)-dione (Nip2).
In a 50 mL three-necked flask, equipped with a DeanꢀStark
apparatus, 4-hydroxy-N-phenyl-1,8-naphthalimide 4b (400 mg,
1.38 mmol), propargyl alcohol derivate 5 (438 mg, 1.84 mmol)
and aluminum oxide (4.00 g) were mixed in toluene (20 mL). The
reaction mixture was refluxed under argon for 7 h. After cooling, the
resulting mixture was filtered, and the filter cake was washed with
dichloromethane (50 mL ꢁ 3). Then the filtrate and the scrubbing
solution were combined. After concentration, the compound was
purified by column chromatography on silica (petroleum ether:
dichloromethane = 1:2, v/v) to give crude product, then recrys-
tallized from ethanol to afford 140 mg of compound Nip2 as a pale
yellow solid in 20.0% yield. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): δ
8.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, naphthaleneꢀH), 8.58 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H,
1
1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and HRMS. The character H-NMR
14651
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp208082w |J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 14648–14658