Catalytic hydrogenation of lactams 4b,d,e in MeOH
using PtO2 as the catalyst took place in excellent yield with
high facial selectivity, with an uptake of hydrogen by the
most accessible R-face to give the respective decahydro-
quinolines 6 (Scheme 5). Minor amounts of the corre-
sponding C-9 epimers were also formed.
An X-ray crystallographic analysis of lactam 6b unam-
biguously confirmed the absolute configuration of the new
stereogenic center generated in the hydrogenation step and
of the hydroquinoline ring junction carbons formed in the
cyclocondensation reaction.
which was the role of (R)-phenylglycinol, but also can be
used to assemble more complex hydroquinoline-fused
derivatives. Thus, BischlerÀNapieralski cyclization of tri-
cyclic lactams 9a,c,f10 followed by LiAlH4 reduction of the
resulting all-cis hexacyclic derivatives 10 stereoselectively
ledinexcellent yields(85À90% overallyield) to pentacyclic
amino alcohols 11, which embody the pentacyclic skeleton
of tangutorine.11
Scheme 6. Cyclocondensation Reactions with (S)-Tryptopha-
nol
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Enantiopure 6-Substituted cis-Decahy-
droquinolines
Alane reduction of crude tricyclic lactams 6 brought
about the stereoselective7 reductive opening of the oxazo-
lidine ring and the reduction of the lactam and ester (in
series b) carbonyl groups to give cis-decahydroquinolines 7.8
A subsequent catalytic debenzylation in the presence of
Boc2O led to 6-substituted decahydroquinolines 8. Taking
into account the availability of the starting 4-substituted
cyclohexanones, the sequence reported here provides a general
route to enantiopure 6-substituted cis-decahydroquinolines.
Similar cyclocondensation reactions of unsaturated keto
esters 3aÀc and the saturated keto ester 3f with (S)-
tryptophanol9 (Scheme 6) were also highly stereoselective,
leading to the corresponding cis lactams 9 (3S,7aR,11aR)
as the major products [the ratio 9:(3S,7aS,11aS)-isomers
was 4:1; 65%À75% overall yield]. This significantly ex-
pands the potential of tricyclic oxazoloquinolone lactams
as chiral building blocks since (S)-tryptophanol not only
acts as a chiral inductor in the cyclocondensation reaction,
The configuration of the two stereogenic centers
generated in the cyclocondensation reaction was un-
ambiguously established by X-ray diffraction analysis
of the thiolactam derived from 9a, which was prepared
in 77% yield by treatment of 9a with Lawesson’s
reagent. On the other hand, the configuration of the
C-6a and C-14b stereocenters of 11 was deduced from
the NMR data (COSY, HETCOR, and NOESY experiments),
by considering a preferred cis-cisoid-cis conformation,12
and by comparison of the 13C NMR chemical shifts
with the values reported for tangutorine11 (see Supporting
Information).
The stereoselectivity of the BischerÀNapieralski cy-
clization can be rationalized by considering that the
attack of the hydride on the electrophilic carbon center
ꢀ
ꢀ ꢀ
(7) Freville, S.; Celerier, J. O.; Thuy, V. M.; Lhommet, G. Tetrahe-
dron Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2651–2654. See also ref 6a.
(10) Under classical conditions (POCl3, then NaBH4) an attempted
BischlerÀNapieralski cyclization from (S)-tryptophanol-derived lac-
tams lacking the substituent at the aminal carbon resulted in failure
due to the tendency of these lactams to undergo R-amidoalkylation
under acidic condicitions: see ref 9c.
(11) Duan, J.-A.; Williams, I. D.; Che, C.-T.; Zhou, R.-H.; Zhao, S.-X.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2593–2596.
(12) For the conformational behavior of complex quinolizidine-
(8) At this stage, minor amounts of 6-epi-7d and 6-epi-7e, formed
from the minor epimers generated in the hydrogenation step, were
isolated.
(9) For cyclocondensation reactions of δ-oxo acid derivatives with
(S)-tryptophanol, see: (a) Allin, S. M.; Thomas, C. I.; Doyle, K.;
Elsegood, M. R. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 357–359. (b) Amat, M.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
Santos, M. M. M.; Bassas, O.; Llor, N.; Escolano, C.; Gomez-Esque, A.;
ꢀ
containing derivatives, see: (a) Tourwe, D.; Laus, G.; Van Binst, G.
Molins, E.; Allin, S. M.; McKee, V.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
5193–5201. (c) Amat, M.; Gomez-Esque, A.; Escolano, C.; Santos,
M. M. M.; Molins, E.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1205–1211.
(d) Allin, S. M.; Duffy, L. J.; Towler, J. M. R.; Page, P. C. B.; Elsegood,
M. R. J.; Saha, B. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10230–10234.
J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 322–324. (b) Tourwe, D.; Van Binst, G. Hetero-
cycles 1978, 9, 507–533. (c) Lounasmaa, M.; Jokela, R.; Tamminen, T.
Heterocycles 1985, 23, 1367–1371. (d) Lounasmaa, M.; Hanhinen, P.
Heterocycles 1999, 51, 2227–2254.
212
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012