7136
C. Sinz et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 7131–7136
in an hGCGR murine PD model. Oral administration of 13 to hGCGR
mice 1 h prior to a glucagon challenge resulted in significant block-
ade of glucose excursion, at doses as low as 1 mg/kg (Fig. 2). To
demonstrate efficacy in a murine diabetes model, oral administra-
tion of 43 to ob/ob mice expressing only the human glucagon
receptor at doses as low as 1 mg/kg led to significant reduction
in ambient glucose levels over a 6 h period (Fig. 3).
We report herein a novel, orally active cyclic guanidine class of
hGCGR antagonists. Compound 7, the initial lead for this series, dis-
played promising in vitro potency and efficacy in vivo but suffered
from unacceptable PK profiles in preclinical species and poor hu-
man liver microsome stability, largely due to N-demethylation. A
strategy aimed at improving metabolic stability by introducing ste-
ric bulk near the site of metabolism resulted in a series of 4,6-
disubstituted cyclic guanidine analogs which demonstrate vastly
improved metabolic stability, good rodent PK profiles, and excel-
lent pharmacodynamic activity. Highlighting the potential of cyclic
guanidine human glucagon receptor antagonists, compound 43 ef-
fected robust blockade of glucagon induced glucose excursion in
murine PD model, and also effected significant reduction in ambi-
ent glucose levels in ob/ob/hGCGR efficacy model.
Figure 2. Effect of compound 43 on glucagon-induced glucose excursion in hGCGR
mice. Compound was administered orally in 0.25% methylcellulose.
References and notes
1. Inhibition of hepatic glucose production as an approach to type 2 diabetes has
been reviewed: (a) Kurukulasuriya, R.; Link, J. T.; Pei, Z.; Rohde, J. J.; Richards, S.
J.; Souers, A. J.; Szczepankiewicz, B. G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 99; (b)
Kurukulasuriya, R.; Link, J. T.; Madar, D.; Pei, Z.; Richards, S. J.; Rohde, J. J.;
Souers, A. J.; Szczepankiewicz, B. G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 123; For a recent
review of glucagon antagonism for type 2 diabetes, see: (c) Ali, S.; Drucker, D. J.
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, E415; For
a review of small
molecule glucagon antagonists, see: (d) Sloop, K. W.; Michael, M. D.; Moyers, J.
S. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2005, 9, 593.
2. Liang, Y.; Osborne, M. C.; Monia, B. P.; Bhanot, S.; Gaarde, W. A.; Reed, C.; She,
P.; Jetton, T. L.; Demarest, K. T. Diabetes 2004, 53, 410.
3. Sloop, K. W.; Cao, J. X.-C.; Siesky, A. M.; Zhang, H. Y.; Boenmiller, D. M.; Cox, A.
L.; Jacos, S. J.; Moyers, J. S.; Owens, R. A.; Showalter, A. D.; Brenner, M. B.; Raap,
A.; Gromada, J.; Berridge, B. R.; Moneteith, D. K. B.; Porksen, N.; McKay, R. A.;
Monia, B. P.; Bhanot, S.; Watts, L. M.; Doson, M. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 113, 1571.
4. (a) Some aspects of this work have recently been presented: Kim, R.; Chang, J.;
Lins, A. R; Sinz, C. J.; Beconi, M.; Brady, E. J.; Candelore, M. R.; Ding, V.; Jiang, G.;
Lin, Z.; Qureshi, S.; Salituro, G.; Saperstein, R.; Shang, J.; Tota, L.; Wright, M.;
Yang, X.; Tata, J.; Zhang, B.; Parmee, E. Abstracts of Papers, 232nd National
Meeting of the American Chemical Society: San Francisco, CA, 2006; American
Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2009; MEDI-294; (b) Kim, R. M.; Chang, J.;
Lins, A. R.; Brady, E.; Candelore, M. R.; Dallas-Yang, Q.; Ding, V.; Dragovic, J.;
Iliff, S.; Jiang, G.; Mock, S.; Qureshi, S.; Saperstein, R.; Szalkowski, D.;
Tamvakopoulos, C.; Tota, L.; Wright, M.; Yang, X.; Tata, J. R.; Chapman, K.;
Zhang, B. B.; Parmee, E. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 3701; (c) Madsen,
P.; Kodra, J. T.; Behrens, C.; Nishimura, E.; Jeppesen, C. B.; Pridal, L.; Andersen,
B.; Knudsen, L. B.; Valcare-Aspegren, C.; Guldbrandt, M.; Christensen, I. T.;
Jørgensen, A. S.; Ynddal, L.; Brand, C. L.; Bagger, M. A.; Lau, J. J. Med. Chem. 2009,
52, 2989.
Figure 3. Acute lowering of ambient glucose levels by compound 43 in an hGCGR/
ob/ob mouse model. Compound was administered orally in 0.5% methylcellulose.
showed >250-fold selectivity over the hGLP-1 receptor and 20 to
100-fold selectivity over the hGIP receptor. Compounds 13 and
38, which differ only by their C6-substituents, exhibited similar
selectivity profiles. Aniline substitution had a more dramatic im-
pact on selectivity, with a 4-tert-butyl (compound 42) substituent
resulting in poor selectivity over hGIP and IKr. Interestingly, while
the 3-trifluoromethoxy and 3-trifluoromethyl substituents on
compounds 44 and 45 engendered potent IKr binding, the 4-trifluo-
romethyl analog 43 displayed excellent selectivity.10
Compounds 13, 38, and 43 all displayed acceptable selectivity,
and were chosen for further profiling in vivo. The PK profiles for
these selected compounds in preclinical species are outlined in Ta-
ble 6. In all cases, C4-substitution led to enhanced oral bioavailabil-
ity relative to the benchmark compound 7, while compounds 13 and
43 also displayed longer half-lives. Compound 43 was also found to
have a favorable PK profile in the dog (t1/2 = 4.7 h, F = 35%).
5. Petersen, K. F.; Sullivan, J. T. Diabetologia 2001, 44, 2018.
6. Qureshi, S. A.; Candelore, M. R.; Xie, D.; Yang, X.; Tota, L. M.; Ding, V. D.-H.; Li,
Z.; Bansal, A.; Miller, C.; Cohen, S.; Jiang, G.; Brady, E.; Saperstein, R.; Duffy, J. L.;
Tata, J. R.; Chapman, K. T.; Moller, D. E.; Zhang, B. Diabetes 2004, 53, 3267.
7. (a) Shiao, L.-L.; Cascieri, M. A.; Trumbauer, M.; Chen, H.; Sullivan, K. A.
Transgenic Res. 1999, 8, 295; (b) Dallas-Yang, Q.; Shen, X.; Strowski, M.; Brady,
E.; Saperstein, R.; Gibson, R. E.; Szalkowski, D.; Candelore, M. R.; Fenyk-Melody,
J. E.; Parmee, E. R.; Zhang, B. B.; Jiang, G. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 501, 225.
8. For metabolic stability studies, test compounds (1 lM) were incubated with
microsomal proteins (0.25 mg/mL) containing NADPH (1 mM) for 1 h at 37 °C.
9. Torraca, K. E.; Huang, X.; Parrish, C. A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 10770.
10. IKr binding data were obtained by measuring displacement of
[
35S]-
radiolabeled MK-499 from HEK cells stably expressing hERG: Lynch, J. J., Jr.;
Wallace, A. A.; Stupienski, R. F., III; Baskin, E. P.; Beare, C. M.; Appleby, S. D.;
Salata, J. J.; Jurkiewicz, N. K.; Sanguinetti, M. C.; Stein, R. B.; Gehret, J. R.;
Kothestein, T.; Claremon, D. A.; Elliott, J. M.; Butcher, J. W.; Remy, D. C.;
Baldwin, J. J. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994, 269, 541.
Based on its potent hGCGR antagonist activity, good selectivity
and favorable rodent PK profile, compound 43 selected for testing