coupling between two different olefin components has hardly
been developed, though this reaction provides a highly
efficient approach to a diene moiety that is commonly
found in naturally occurring compounds. Only four examples
of metal-catalyzed cross-coupling of olefins to dienes have
been reported since Ishii and co-workers presented the first
example in 2004.[7] The paucity of methods for the catalytic
cross-coupling of olefins indicates the difficulty for olefins to
undergo this type of transformation. In addition to the
reactivity issue, another challenge in achieving the cross-
coupling of three olefin components is the control of
selectivity. All the reported metal-catalyzed cross-coupling
reactions of olefins produce the dimerization products with-
out further incorporation of the third olefin component into
the molecular framework. For example, ruthenium- or
rhodium-catalyzed couplings of two different olefins results
construction of benzene rings. This method allows the
reaction to occur under mild conditions, and is compatible
with a broad range of functional groups. Notably, no product
from olefin dimerization was detected in the crude reaction
mixture, thus illustrating that this cross-coupling reaction of
olefins to produce benzene rings proceeds in a domino
manner.
Initially, the reaction of 1,4-benzoquinone (1a) with
cyclohexyl vinyl ether (2a) was chosen as a model reaction
for optimization of the reaction conditions. The product of
this model reaction, 6-cyclohexyloxy-1,4-naphthoquinone
(3a), was characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray
single-crystal diffraction analysis;[9] the results confirmed that
the cross-coupling of olefins to substituted benzene ring was
accompanied by loss of an alkoxyl group. Avariety of reaction
parameters were observed to have an impact on the efficiency
of this reaction. Among the palladium sources that were
examined, Pd(OAc)2 afforded the best catalytic reactivity.
Control experiments showed that palladium sources were
indispensable for this reaction to occur. In contrast, other
additives, such as silver salts, were not crucial to achieve
catalytic turnover. For example, the reaction of two equiv-
alents of 1a with 2a, in which 1a acted as both the reagent and
the oxidant, provided 3a in 44% yield in the absence of
AgOAc. However, addition of AgOAc or a combination of
Ag2CO3 with carboxylic acids considerably enhanced the
turnover when 1a was the limiting reagent. Other oxidants
that were commonly used for reoxidation of Pd0 to PdII, for
example, various CuII salts, also worked for this reaction but
were inferior to AgOAc.[9] A survey of solvents showed that
coordinating DMSO was required for this reaction to occur.
However, the introduction of DMF or 1,2-dimethoxyethane
(DME) as a cosolvent with DMSO significantly improved this
reaction compared with the use of DMSO alone, and the
variation of concentration of DMSO in a mixed solvent
influenced the reaction outcomes. The optimum reaction
medium was found to be 5% (v/v) DMSO in DMF. These
observations suggested that a palladium complex with DMSO
as the ligand may be involved in the catalytic process. This
hypothesis was supported by the fact that replacement of
DMSO with its analogue tetramethylene sulfoxide gave a
comparable result. The combination of these efforts estab-
lished that the best yield of 3a (64%) could be achieved by
the reaction of 1a with four equivalents of 2a conducted in a
mixed solvent of DMSO in DMF (5% v/v) at 608C for 12 h
with 8 mol% Pd(OAc)2 as a catalyst and six equivalents of
AgOAc as an oxidant (Scheme 3).[10]
À
in the alkylation of one coupling partner by addition of a C H
[8]
=
bond across a C C double bond, and palladium-catalyzed
reactions generate diene compounds.[7] Therefore, the key to
constructing substituted benzene rings by cross-coupling of
olefins is to identify an active catalyst system that is capable of
catalyzing the cross-coupling of olefins in a domino manner.
There are two possible ways to achieve this goal: 1) the
catalyst system preferentially promotes the reaction of diene
B with an olefin rather than the initial formation of diene B
(path A, Scheme 2); 2) the catalyst system enables the olefin
Scheme 2. Construction of substituted benzene rings by cross-coupling
of olefins.
to intercept intermediate A prior to its b-hydrogen elimina-
tion (path B, Scheme 2). For path B, a strategy to intercept
intermediate A is the use of a cyclic olefin as one of the
coupling partners. The metal/cycloalkyl-complex intermedi-
ate derived from the cyclic olefin through the carbometala-
tion of the double bond is reluctant to form a syn-coplanar
conformation for b-hydrogen elimination and consequently
reacts with an additional olefin molecule.
Herein, we verify the feasibility of the catalytic cross-
coupling of olefins to furnish substituted benzene rings with
high selectivity. A versatile catalyst system has been devel-
oped for the direct coupling of electron-deficient cyclic olefins
(1,4-benzoquinone or its derivatives) with electron-rich
olefins (alkyl vinyl ethers) to produce alkoxy-substituted
1,4-naphthoquinones or 9,10-anthraquinones through the
With the optimized reaction conditions established, we
next examined the generality of this transformation. As
shown in Scheme 3, both mono- and disubstituted 1,4-
benzoquinones underwent smooth coupling with 2a to form
the desired products in good yields (3b–3e). Reactions of
monosubstituted 1,4-benzoquinones resulted in a regioiso-
meric mixture of 6- and 7-substituted 1,4-naphthoquinones
with 6-substituted isomers as main products. Interestingly, the
regioselectivity toward 6-substituted products could be
improved by increasing the steric bulk of the substituents in
monosubstituted 1,4-benzoquinones, as illustrated by a com-
parison between the yields of 2-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9926 –9930
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim