Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
indicate that the spin density (Figure 6) is concentrated on
atoms B1, C1, and C5. As before, bond-order calculations were
the case of 2, reduction occurs at the Te centers. The
preparation of the (BIAN)BI complex 4, which displays a
doubly reduced ligand architecture, provides further evidence
that the TIP ligand class possesses a unique electronic behavior
and range of reactivities in comparison with those of the
monofunctional BIAN ligand.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
Full experimental data, spectroscopic characterization, and
crystallographic data are provided. This material is available free
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Figure 6. Projection of the spin density of 3 on the 0.03 au isosurface
of the electron density.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
employed to examine the bonding in 3, the results of which are
consistent with strong σ bonding interactions and efficient
delocalization of π electron density onto the ligand.
■
Financial support from the Robert A. Welch Foundation
(A.H.C.) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada (I.V.-B.) is gratefully acknowledged. This
work was made possible by access to the facilities of the Shared
Hierarchical Academic Research Computing Network
da.
Given the unanticipated course of the reaction of the TIP
ligand with BI3, we were curious to discover the outcome of the
reaction of the analogous monofunctional dpp-BIAN ligand
with this boron trihalide. Accordingly, dpp-BIAN was treated
with 1 equiv of BI3 in dichloromethane solution which resulted,
after workup, in the isolation of dark red, solid 4.
Recrystallization of the crude material was effected by slow
evaporation of a THF solution of 4. X-ray crystallographic
analysis of 4 revealed that it is a neutral complex in which the
BIAN ligand is coordinated to a BI moiety (Figure 7). Scrutiny
REFERENCES
■
(1) Vasudevan, K. V.; Findlater, M.; Cowley, A. H. Chem. Commun.
2008, 1918−1919.
(2) Vasudevan, K. V.; Vargas-Baca, I.; Cowley, A. H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8369−8371.
(3) (a) Fedushkin, I. L.; Skatova, A. A.; Chudakova, V. A.; Fukin, G.
K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5223−5226.
(4) Reeske, G.; Hoberg, C. R.; Cowley, A. H. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46,
1426−1430.
(5) Dutton, J. L.; Tuononen, H. M.; Ragogna, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 4409−4413.
(6) (a) Michalak, A.; De Kock, R. L.; Ziegler, T. J. Phys. Chem. A
2008, 112, 7256. (b) Nalewajski, R. F.; Mrozek, J. Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 1994, 51, 187. (c) Nalewajski, R. F.; Mrozek, J. Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 1997, 61, 589. (d) Nalewajski, R. F.; Mrozek, J.; Michalak, A.
Pol. J. Chem. 1998, 72, 1779. (e) Nalewajski, R. F.; Mrozek, J.; Mazur,
G. Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74, 1121.
(7) Becke, A. D.; Edgecombe, K. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397.
(8) Hill, N. J.; Vasudevan, K.; Cowley, A. H. Jordan J. Chem. 2006, 1,
47−54.
(9) Jenkins, H. A.; Dumaresque, C. L.; Vidovic, D.; Clyburne, J. A. C.
Can. J. Chem. 2002, 80, 1398−1403.
(10) Segawa, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Yamashita, M.; Nozaki, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 47, 16069−16079.
Figure 7. POV-Ray view of 4 with thermal ellipsoids shown at 40%
probability. All hydrogen atoms and one molecule of lattice CH2Cl2
have been removed for clarity.
of the metrical parameters leads to the conclusion that two-
electron reduction has taken place. Diagnostic in this regard are
the C(1)−C(12) and average C−N bond distances of 1.354(6)
and 1.409(6) Å, respectively. A similar conclusion has been
reached by Nozaki et al. on the basis of the metrical parameters
for the corresponding diazabutadiene complex, (DAB)BI.10
In conclusion, three novel TIP-supported main group
complexes have been prepared that feature three- and four-
electron redox events. To the best of our knowledge,
compounds 1 and 3 represent the first crystallographically
characterized examples of ligands that involve reduction by
more than two electrons from p-block sources. In complexes 1
and 3, the TIP ligand serves as the electron acceptor while, in
178
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja2102828 | J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2012, 134, 176−178