G Model
CCLET 2992 1–5
2
H. Singh et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Table 1
56
57
liquid [NMP]H2PO4 was prepared according to the literature
procedure [6].
Effect of solvent and temperature on the reaction of 2,7-dihydroxynaphthlaene, 4-
bromobenzaldehyde and dimedone.
No.
Solvent
Temp
Time
(min)a
Yield
(%)a
Standard
deviation (SD)c
58
59
2.1. General procedure for the synthesis of 12-aryl-8,9,10,12-
(8C)
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthene-11-one derivatives (1a–1y)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ethanol
80
80
82
58
41
73
70
60
14
22
14
44b
67b
81.5
62b
65.5b
72b
90
1.414
2.828
2.121
1.414
3.535
4.242
1.414
2.828
0.070
Water
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
A mixture of 2,7-dihydroxynaphthalene/2-naphthol/2,6-dihy-
droxynaphthalene (1.0 mmol), substituted aromatic aldehydes
(1.0 mmol), dimedone/cyclohexane-1,3-dione (1.1 mmol) and task
specific ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4 (20 mol%) was placed in a 50 mL
round-bottomed flask mounted over a magnetic stirrer. The
reaction mixture was stirred at 80 8C for the appropriate time as
mentioned in Table 3. The progress of the reaction was monitored
by TLC using ethyl acetate: petroleum ether (20:80, v/v) as the
eluent. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC, water
(10 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The precipitate formed
was collected by vacuum filtration and washed with water. The
product was recrystallized from ethanol to give the pure product
(1a–1y) in high yield. The products were characterized by mp, IR,
NMR and mass spectra.
DMF
80
Methanol
80
THF
80
Acetonitrile
80
–
–
–
80
60
85
100
86.5
a
Results were averaged for two measurements to minimize random errors.
Mixture of two products.
b
c
S.D. for yield measurement.
ArH), 7.37–7.33 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.20 (d, 2H, J = 8.04 Hz, ArH), 7.13–
7.10 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.05–7.02 (m, 1H, ArH), 5.48 (s, 1H, ArCH), 2.64
and 2.53 (AB system, 2H, J = 17.45 Hz, CHaHb), 2.30 (d, 1H,
J = 16.2 Hz, CHaCO), 2.10 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz, CHbCO), 1.03 (s, 3H,
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
2.1.1. 12-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-hydroxy-9,9-dimethyl-8,9,10,12-
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthen-11-one (1a) [15b]
CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 195.96,
White solid; mp: 180–181 8C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
164.10, 154.70, 145.01, 144.43, 132.70, 131.02, 130.66, 130.30,
127.48, 124.78, 124.51, 119.40, 119.23, 117.30, 116.73, 112.53,
110.01, 50.08, 33.78, 31.90, 28.73, 28.60, 26.50, 26.20; IR (KBr,
cmÀ1): nmax 3340, 2950, 1614, 1547, 1379, 1220; MS (ESI) [M+]
calcd. for C25H21BrO3: 448, found: 449 [M++H], 451 [M++H+2].
9.89 (s, 1H, OH), 7.77–7.74 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.40 (d, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz,
ArH), 7.19 (d, 4H, J = 8.7 Hz, ArH), 6.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz, ArH), 5.32
(s, 1H, ArCH), 2.67 and 2.56 (AB system, 2H, J = 17.7 Hz, CHaHb),
2.34 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz, CHaCO), 2.13 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz, CHbCO),
1.05 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.86 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
195.92, 164.02, 156.52, 147.63, 144.00, 132.32, 131.00, 130.28,
129.01, 125.48, 119.26, 117.19, 114.74, 113.51, 112.75, 105.06,
3. Results and discussion
126
50.04, 40.34, 33.79, 31.85, 28.78, 26.21; IR (KBr, cmÀ1):
n
max 3328,
We present herein an efficient and environmentally benign
protocol for the synthesis of 12-aryl-8,9,10,12-tetrahydroben-
zo[a]xanthene-11-one derivatives by one pot condensation of 2-
naphthols, aldehydes and cyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds using
task specific acidic ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4 at 80 8C. The most
suitable reaction conditions for the proposed reaction were
achieved by investigating the model reaction of 4-bromobenzal-
dehyde (1.0 mmol), 2,7-dihydroxynaphthalene (1.0 mmol), and
dimedone (1.1 mmol) under different reaction conditions as
shown in Table 1. The best result was obtained when the reaction
was carried at 80 8C in the absence of any solvent using 20 mol% of
task specific ionic liquid NMP[H2PO4]. The reaction was complete
in 14 min and yielded 90% of 12-(4-bromophenyl)-2-hydroxy-9,9-
dimethyl-8,9,10,12-tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthene-11-one (1a) af-
ter a simple workup (Table 1, entry 7). Reactions attempted in
solvents such as ethanol, water, DMF, methanol, THF and
acetonitrile in the presence of ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4
(20 mol%) as the catalyst required longer reaction time and
resulted in inferior yields of the product 1a (Table 1, entries 1–6).
Reactions repeated at 60 8C required longer times while reactions
attempted at 100 8C required the same reaction times (Table 1,
entries 8 and 9). Thus, ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4 with dual roles of
solvent and catalyst was found to be most suitable for this three-
component reaction for the synthesis of benzo[a]xanthene
derivatives.
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
2959, 1626, 1597, 1380, 1225; MS (ESI) [M+] calcd. for C25H21BrO3:
448, found: 449 [M++H], 451 [M++H+2].
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
2.1.2. 12-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-hydroxy-8,9,10,12-
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthen-11-one (1k) [15f]
White solid; mp: 234–236 8C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
9.89 (s, 1H, OH), 7.73–7.78 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.41 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz,
ArH), 7.13–7.21 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.95–6.99 (m, 1H, ArH), 5.35 (s, 1H,
ArCH), 2.73–2.69 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.37–2.26 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.86–1.80
(m, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 196.19, 165.90,
156.49, 147.65, 144.27, 132.33, 131.06, 130.32, 130.28, 128.99,
125.44, 119.28, 117.16, 114.70, 113.96, 113.46, 105.01, 36.36,
33.70, 26.90, 19.88; IR (KBr, cmÀ1): nmax 3326, 2944, 1626, 1597,
1379, 1231, 1197; MS (ESI) [M+] calcd. for C23H17BrO3: 421, found:
422 [M++H], 424 [M++H+2].
99
2.1.3. 12-(4-Bromophenyl)-9,9-dimethyl-8,9,10,12-
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthen-11-one (1p) [15g]
White solid; mp: 186–187 8C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
7.89 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, ArH), 7.80–7.76 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.45–7.38 (m,
2H, ArH), 7.33–7.23 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.23–7.20 (m, 2H, ArH), 5.66 (s,
1H, ArCH), 2.60 and 2.50 (AB system, 2H, J = 17.60 Hz, CHaHb), 2.24
(d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz, CHaCO), 2.12 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz, CHbCO), 1.12 (s,
3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
196.75, 164.0, 147.85, 143.7, 131.45, 131.22, 130.10, 129.12,
128.56, 127.20, 125.23, 123.48, 120.55, 117.25, 116.89, 113.52,
We study the comprehensive effect of temperature and amount
of acidic ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4 on the yield of 1a using factorial
analysis. Factorial analysis was carried out by considering two
experimental factors with three levels, i.e. temperature (with levels
60 8C, 80 8C, 100 8C) and amount of ionic liquid (with levels
10 mol%, 20 mol%, 30 mol%). The model reaction for the synthesis
of 1a was performed under different conditions as obtained by
fully designed factorial array for these factors (Table 2).
50.23, 41.23, 34.69, 32.87, 29.78, 26.98; IR (KBr, cmÀ1):
nmax 2955,
1652, 1596, 1373, 1228, 1160; MS (ESI) [M+] calcd. for C25H21BrO2:
432, found: 433 [M++H], 435 [M++H+2].
112
113
114
115
2.1.4. 12-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-hydroxy-9,9-dimethyl-8,9,10,12-
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthen-11-one (1u) [15e]
White solid; mp: 208–209 8C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
The factorial analysis was performed using Minitab 17 software,
and the results of factorial analysis are shown in Fig. 1. From Fig. 1
9.79 (s, 1H, OH), 7.82 (d, 1H, J = 9.5 Hz, ArH), 7.67 (d, 1H, J = 9.5 Hz,
Please cite this article in press as: H. Singh, et al.,
A
new green approach for the synthesis of 12-aryl-8,9,10,12-
tetrahydrobenzo[a]xanthene-11-one derivatives using task specific acidic ionic liquid [NMP]H2PO4, Chin. Chem. Lett. (2014),