pigment epithelial cells) to examine the capacity of our
probes to measure •OH generated in an active biological
environment. Incubation of ARPE-19 cells with probe I,
II, or III (2 μM) for 12 h at 37 °C yielded negligible
intracellular background fluorescence (Figure S5). Con-
versely, addition of 10 μM •OH to probe-loaded cells
(12 h, 37 °C) triggers a considerable increase in intracellular
fluorescence. Also, determination of DIC (differential
interference contrast) images and nuclear counter stain-
ing confirmed that our cells were viable throughout the
imaging analyses, all of which indicated that our probes
were cell permeable, nontoxic, and capable of detecting
increased •OH under conditions indicative of oxidative
stress.
Iron or copper can induce production of •OH from
H2O2. Accordingly, we extended the previous studies and
further induced oxidative stress using hydrogen peroxide.
Exposure of probe (IꢀIII)-preloaded ARPE-19 cells re-
sulted in considerable fluorescence induction following
H2O2 exposure (Figure S6), and the time-related increase
in fluoroscence suggested ongoing reaction of the probe
with additional radicals. As a control for this experiment,
cells were exposed to oxidative stress conditions in the
absence of the probes, and the weak autofluorescence
indicated that enhanced fluorescence with peroxide addi-
tion correlated with increased •OH concentration.
Low-Level Detection of •OH with PMA (12-Myristate
13-Acetate) Stimulation. To test the sensitivity of our
probes detecting the concentrations of •OH produced
with physiological stimulation (very low levels expected
in signaling cascades), we employed ARPE-19 cells which
are predicted to generate low micromolar levels of •OH
upon stimulation with PMA.6 Accordingly, ARPE-19
cells were stimulated with PMA (40 ng/mL) and incu-
bated with probes IꢀIII (2 μM) for 12 h (Figure 3).
APRE-19 cells incubated with 2 μM probes IꢀIII re-
vealed minimal background fluorescence. Conversely, a
striking increase in intracellular fluorescence was ob-
served upon treatment of probe IꢀIII- (2 μM) preloaded
cells with PMA. Control experiments with cells in the
absence of either probe or a probe without PMA stimula-
tion yielded negligible fluorescence responses. Moreover,
cellular viability was verified with DIC images. These
findings indicate that probes IꢀIII are both cell mem-
brane-permeable and responsive to intracellular •OH
concentration changes, with probe III producing the
strongest fluorescence signal.
Figure 2. Absorbance (line 1, 3) and fluorescence spectra (line 2,
4) of probe I (1 μM) before (line 1, 2) and after (line 3, 4) addition
of Fenton reagent (Cu2þ: H2O2, mol/mol = 1:30) in the presence
of DMSO (0.1%) at pH = 4.
The highest fluorescence enhancement seen with probe III
was most likely associated with its binitroxide structure.
Unique to our strategy, a dark background from which a
bright signal appears upon reaction with •OH offers a dis-
tinct advantage in comparison to other probes for •OH,3
and the correspondingly decreased background fluorescence
lends itself to a higher signal-to-noise ratio, a highly desirable
end point for in vivo imaging with live cells.
We exposed our probes to a variety of radical species.
Our results revealed that probe III exhibited a >1000-
fold higher response for •OH in comparison to NO,
H2O2, and glutathione and a >40-fold higher response
for •OH over ROO•, ascorbate, SIN-1, and superoxide.
Probes I and II also demonstrated selectivity for •OH
versus other ROS (Figure S3ꢀS4). We suggest that the
selectivity of these probes for •OH results from the high
reactivity of •OH with any organic molecules (such as
DMSO present in our experiments) to generate carbon
centered radicals by H-abstraction, which subsequently
react with the nitroxides. The other ROS have lower rate
constants of direct reaction with nitroxides and lower rate
constants of H-abstraction from organic molecules to
generate carbon centered radicals.
Detection of •OH in Cancer Cells. Expanding evidence
suggests a link between free radicals and cancer.7 Accord-
ingly, to examine the capacity of our probes to quantify
•OH in cancer cells, we characterized these probes in
SW620 (human colon cancer cells), Hela (human cervical
cancer cells), and HepG2 cells (human hepatocellular
liver carcinoma cells). Time-course analyses of probe
uptake revealed rapid cellular access and stability over
In Vivo Detection of •OH during Oxidative Stress. Since
retinal pigment epithelial cells are susceptible to oxidative
damage,5 we employed ARPE-19 cells (human retinal
(6) Takeuchi, T.; Nakajima, M.; Morimoto, K. Carcinogenesis 1996,
(5) (a) Winkler, B. S.; Boulton, M. E.; Gottsch, J. D.; Sternberg, P.
Mol. Vis. 1999, 5. (b) Beatty, S.; Koh, H. H.; Henson, D.; Boulton, M.
Surv. Ophthalmol. 2000, 45, 115. (c) Cai, J. Y.; Nelson, K. C.; Wu, M.;
Sternberg, P.; Jones, D. P. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2000, 19, 205.
17, 1543.
(7) Hemnani, T.; Parihar, M. S. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1998,
42, 440.
52
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012