Organic Letters
Letter
arenediazonium: KSV0(2a) = 88 dm3/L; KSV0(2e) = 490 dm3/
L; KSV0(2i) = 1500 dm3/L. These data are indicative of an
oxidative quenching of the excited photocatalyst [Ru2+]* by
the diazonium salt. This is further supported by the observed
gas evolution during the reaction. The reductive mesolysis of
the arenediazonium salt is also in full accord with the detection
of an aryl-TEMPO adduct and the inhibition of product
formation by addition of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl
(TEMPO, Figure S2). Further insight into the operating redox
events was provided by the analysis of the redox potentials
(Figure 1c). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) confirmed that facile
reduction of arenediazonium salts is thermodynamically
feasible with the excited-state photocatalyst: Ered(2a) =
−0.18 V; Ered(2e) = 0.00 V; Ered(2i) = +0.03 V;
Ered([Ru2+]*)= −0.81 V (vs SCE).21 The difference in redox
potentials of this series explains the observed trend in the
quenching constants KSV0 above where easily reduced
compounds quench [Ru2+]* faster. On the other hand,
[Ru2+]* (Ered = +0.77 V) is not a sufficiently strong oxidant
for the 1e-oxidation of any of the cyclopropanols (Ered > + 1
V). These data support the notion of an initiating oxidative
quenching of [Ru2+]*. The resultant ground-state [Ru3+] is
sufficiently oxidizing (Ered = +1.29 V) to convert electron-rich
cyclopropanols (Ered(1a) = +1.08 V), while 1e-oxidations of
electron-poor cyclopropanols are thermodynamically unfa-
vored and only feasible when coupled with efficient follow-
up reactions (Ered(1g) = +1.40 V; Ered(1k) = +1.54 V; i.e.,
<250 mV uphill).22 Unstrained cycloalkanols have reduction
potentials (Ered (1q) = +1.72 V) that are prohibitive for
oxidations with [Ru3+] (Figure 1c). A proton-coupled electron
transfer mechanism in combination with a more strongly
oxidizing photosensitizers such as acridinium salts could
overcome this limitation.23 The operation of an H atom-
abstraction mechanism9i was excluded based on the perfect
correlation of cycloalkanol reactivities and oxidation potentials.
The fate of the oxidized cyclopropanols was another puzzle
piece of the operating reaction mechanism. One-electron
oxidations of cyclopropanols have been known to result in
labile radical cations that undergo rapid ring-opening to β-keto
radicals.14a The feasibility of trapping of the intermediate
benzoylethyl radicals 1•+ with arenediazonium 2 was probed
by a CV experiment (Figure 1b): The cyclopropanol 1a (blue
line) displayed an irreversible oxidation wave (Ered = +1.08 V),
the diazonium salt 2f (red line) an irreversible reduction wave
(Ered = +0.00 V). However, subjection of an equimolar mixture
of both substrates to such CV electrolysis (black line;
increasing potentials from 0.5 V), an unchanged oxidation
peak of 1a was observed while the reduction peak of 2e
disappeared. This is indicating that the oxidized alcohol 1a•+
underwent chemical reaction with the diazonium salt prior to
reduction of the latter. The resultant adduct of 1•+ and 2 (i.e.,
4•+) engages in 1e-reduction to a neutral compound that
cyclizes to a pyrazole. Further insight was derived from the
quantum yield of Φ = 4.2 for the formation of 3aa. This value
indicates the presence of an efficient radical chain propagation,
which most likely is the oxidation of cyclopropanol 1 with the
radical adduct 4•+ (Figure 1d). To probe its feasibility, we
utilized the model compound 2-ethyl-1-phenyldiazene (5),
which should exhibit similar redox properties as 4 but undergo
no onward cyclization reaction. CV spectra showed irreversible
oxidation of 5 at +1.55 V. This value is likely to include
overpotential, so we also obtained a DFT-derived theoretical
tion). In comparison with the reduction potentials of the
cyclopropanols (1.08−1.54 V), these support the operation of
radical chain propagation by reactions of the cyclopropanols 1
with the radical adduct intermediates 4•+ (Figure 1d). Based
on the collected mechanistic data, we propose the reaction
mechanism shown in Figure 1e. The reaction is initiated by
oxidative quenching of [Ru2+]* with the arenediazonium salt 2.
The resultant [Ru3+] oxidizes the strained alcohol 1 to give 1•+
which undergoes rapid ring-opening and radical trapping with
the arenediazonium salt. The radical cation adduct 4•+ can
engage in a radical chain process by oxidizing another molecule
of 1 or quench the excited catalyst to close the photocatalytic
cycle. As the radical chain process is dominant (Φ = 4.2),
cocatalytic amounts of the arenediazonium 2 are required to
produce the key oxidant [Ru(bpy)33+] salt must be used to
activate the catalyst, which is also evident from the optimal
reaction conditions involving a slight excess of 2. The adduct 4
undergoes cyclization and dehydration to give the pyrazole 3.
In conclusion, this protocol enables a rare photocatalytic
reaction of arenediazonium that proceeds with conservation of
the diazo function. In the presence of arylcyclopropanols, N-
arylpyrazoles are obtained within 20 min under blue light
irradiation in good yields. The reaction displayed high
regiocontrol (only 1,5-diaryl pyrazoles formed) and high
functional group tolerance (F, Cl, N3, CO2Me, CN, CF3, SF5,
thiophene, alkyne). Combined synthetic, spectroscopic, and
theoretical studies supported the notion of a radical chain
mechanism, which involves photocatalytic initiation by
oxidative photocatalyst quenching with the arenediazonium,
oxidation of the arylcyclopropanol with ground-state [Ru3+]*,
and radical chain propagation between the arylcyclopropanol
and the radical cationic adduct of both starting materials.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
sı
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
Experimental procedures, analytical data, and spectra
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
Michal Majek − Department of Organic Chemistry, Comenius
Axel Jacobi von Wangelin − Department of Chemistry,
University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
Authors
Luana Cardinale − Department of Chemistry, University of
Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Michael Neumeier − Department of Chemistry, University of
Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Complete contact information is available at:
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX