building block is employed at the end of a solid phase
oligonucleotide synthesis to discriminate the target
full length oligomers from unwanted, capped deletion
sequences.
nitrogen protecting group, it turned out to be too base
labile in use as a hydroxyl protecting group (as in 2). Thus,
for the fluorous version of the Msc carbonate, we incor-
porated an extra methylene moiety between the fluorous
part and the sulfonyl group to provide extra insulation for
the C8F17 tail, giving the [1H,1H,2H,2H,3H,3H]-per-
fluoro-octylpropylsulfonylethoxycarbonyl (F-Psc, 3).12b
Based on these findings we decided to explore the F-Pse
group 4 as a fluorous linker and phosphate protecting
group. With this linker, synthesized as reported pre-
viously, we set out to establish the scope and limitations
of fluorous teichoic acid synthesis. As depicted in Scheme
1, we elongated F-Pse alcohol 5 in a stepwise manner with
glycerol phosphoramidite 6.10a Each elongation cycle
consisted of four steps: (1) reaction of the alcohol with
phosphoramidite 6 under the agency of dicyanoimidazole
Teichoic acids are biopolymers comprised of repeating
alditol phosphate residues, seemingly randomly deco-
rated with carbohydrate and/or D-alanyl substituents.
They are prime constituents of the Gram-positive bacter-
ial cell wall and, as such, interact with their surroundings
and play an important role in immunology.8 We have
recently reported on both the solution and solid phase
synthesis of teichoic acid fragments of Enterococcus
faecalis,9 built up from repeating glycerol phosphate
residues. Using the former technique we assembled a
kojibiose containing glycerol phosphate hexamer, and
with the latter technique, we generated a small library of
teichoic acid fragments, varying in both size and sub-
stitution pattern.10 We here report on a fluorous phase
synthesis strategy to assemble teichoic acid structures.
To this end, we implemented a new fluorous phos-
phate protective group and developed synthetic proto-
cols compatible with F-SPE extraction techniques. We
show that a light fluorous synthesis strategy is an effi-
cient approach to assemble medium sized teichoic acid
fragments.
Our first objective was the selection of a suitable light
fluorous phosphate protecting group. To date only one
such protecting group has been reported, which has been
applied in the synthesis of a disaccharide.11 We have
recently reported on the use of fluorous sulfonylethyl-
based groups to protect both amino and hydroxyl func-
tions, in the form of a carbamate and carbonate respec-
tively (see Figure 1).12 We deemed this group suitable to
protect phosphate functions since it can be removed at the
end of the synthesis by base catalyzed β-elimination. The
effective use of the 2-(methylsulfonyl)-ethyl (MSc) group
in solid phase oligonucleotide synthesis bodes well for this
approach. Whereas the use of the fluorous version of
the MSc group, the [1H,1H,2H,2H]-perfluorodecylsulfo-
nylethoxycarbonyl (F-Msc, 1), worked very well as a
Figure 1. Fluorous versions of the MSc type protecting group.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Glycerolphosphate Dodecamer 19
(8) (a) Fischer, W. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 1988, 29, 233–302. (b)
Naumova, I. B.; Shashkov, A. S.; Tul’skaya, E. M.; Streshinskaya,
G. M.; Kozlova, Y. I.; Potekhina, N. V.; Evtushenko, L. I.; Stackebrandt,
E. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 25, 269–283. (c) Neuhaus, F. C.; Baddiley,
J. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 686–723. (d) Weidenmaier, C.;
Peschel, A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 276–287.
(9) (a) Theilacker, C.; Kaczynski, Z.; Kropec, A.; Fabretti, F.; Sange,
T.; Holst, O.; Huebner, J. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 5703–5712. (b)
Theilacker, C.; Kaczynski, Z.; Kropec, A.; Sava, I.; Ye, L.; Bychowska,
A.; Holst, O.; Huebner, J. Plos One 2011, 6, e17839. (c) Theilacker, C.;
ꢀ
Kropec, A.; Hammer, F.; Sava, I.; Wobser, D.; Sakinc, T.; Codee,
(DCI); (2) oxidation of the intermediate phosphite
with I2; (3) removal of the DMT protecting group using
dichloroacetic acid (DCA) in the presence of triethylsi-
lane (TES); and (4) F-SPE purification. It proved to be
essential that, before each F-SPE purification, the crude
reaction mixtures were partitioned between MeCN/water
(80/20) and hexane to remove most of the 4,40-dimethox-
ytriphenylmethane and excess TES, since we found that
these could not be separated from the target compounds
by F-SPE when present in relatively large amounts.
Using this protocol we were able to rapidly and efficiently
J. D. C.; Hogendorf, W. F. J.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Huebner, J.
J. Infect. Dis., in press.
(10) (a) Hogendorf, W. F. J.; Van den Bos, L. J.; Overkleeft, H. S.;
ꢀ
Codee, J. D. C.; van der Marel, G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010,
18, 3668–3678. (b) Hogendorf, W. F. J.; Meeuwenoord, N.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Laverde, D.; Kropec, A.; Huebner, J.; Van
ꢀ
der Marel, G. A.; Codee, J. D. C. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8961–
8963.
(11) Liu, L.; Pohl, N. L. B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1824–1827.
(12) (a) De Visser, P. C.; Van Helden, M.; Filippov, D. V.; Van der
Marel, G. A.; Drijfhout, J. W.; Van Boom, J. H.; Noort, D.; Overkleeft,
H. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 9013–9016. (b) Ali, A.; Van den Berg,
R. J. B. H. N.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Filippov, D. V.; Van der Marel, G. A.;
ꢀ
Codee, J. D. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2185–2188.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012
849