Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 41–42
R1
O
R2
R5
N
R1
O
O
N
R1
O
N
N
But
N
C
O
H
HO
H
R4R5NH
N
NH
N
MeOH
AcOH
N
R4
N
But
N
R2
N
R2
+
O
NH
dioxane,
room tem-
perature,
overnight
NH MW, 20 min,
180 °C
50 °C
O
R3
O
H2N R2
room tem-
perature,
24 h
R1
R3
R3
R3
1a–c
2a–c
7a–d, 8a–h
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
Yield (%)
7a
4-PriC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 4-MeC6H4
MeO(CH2)2
Bn
H
H
70
65
7b 4-PriC6H4
O
7c
Pri
4-MeOC6H4CH2 Me
4-MeOC6H4CH2 Me
H
H
69
70
7d Pri
Bn
8a
4-PriC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4CH2 Me
4-MeOC6H4CH2 Me
4-MeOC6H4CH2 Me
(CH2)2O(CH2)2
(CH2)4
(CH2)2N(CO2Et)(CH2)2
(CH2)2O(CH2)2
67
71
68
71
67
72
68
65
8b 4-PriC6H4
8c
4-PriC6H4
8d Pri
8e
8f
Pri
Pri
Pri
Me
Et
(CH2)2N(c-C5H9)(CH2)9
(CH2)2N(Cy)(CH2)9
(CH2)5
8g
Bn
Bn
Cyclopropyl
Cyclopropyl
8h Pri
Scheme 4
We proceeded to study the chemical behaviour of 5,6-dihydro-
pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrazines 2 and found them to be prone to alkaline
hydrolysis at elevated temperatures. Indeed, refluxing a solution
of any of 2 in dioxane in the presence of 2 equiv. of aqueous KOH
led to its complete conversion into the corresponding salt of
carboxylic acid 4 (according to LC-MS analysis). However, despite
numerous attempts, we were unable to isolate and purify any of
the acids 4 (presumably, due to facile decarboxylation).
Compounds 2 can be regarded as internal pyrazolides of the
carboxylic acids 4 and therefore it is unsurprising that they are
reactive toward nucleophiles.7 We therefore turned our attention
to the potential of opening 2 with various amines (rather than
hydroxyl anion) that would provide access to a greater variety
of Ugi-type dipeptoids with terminal amide diversity resulting
from generally much more available primary amines (compared
to the variety of isocyanides) (Scheme 4).
to primary and secondary amines at dioxane reflux temperatures.
This seems unsurprising in view of the greater stability (e.g., toward
hydrolysis) of N-acyl indoles compared to N-acyl pyrazoles.8
In summary, we have developed an efficient access to Ugi-type
dipeptoids containing a greater diversity of terminal secondary
amides as well as hitherto undescribed tertiary amide analogs
thereof. This novel protocol stems from our previously disclosed
methodology of microwave- assisted cyclization of pyrazole-
containing Ugi reaction products and significantly expands the
chemical space of dipeptoids rapidly and efficiently accessible
by the multicomponent approach.
This research was supported by the Federal Agency for
Science and Innovation (Russian Federation Government Contract
02.740.11.0092).
The representative 5,6-dihydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrazines 2a–c
were prepared in good isolated yields via the microwave-assisted
cyclization of the Ugi adducts 1a–c (without isolation of the
latter), as described previously.4 Subsequent overnight treatment
of 2a–c with 2 equiv. of a primary or a secondary amine in dioxane
at room temperature gave cleanly the expected secondary (7a–d)
or tertiary (8a–h) amides in uniformly good yields (Scheme 4).†
Notably, no similar ring opening was observed for the 2,3-dihydro-
pyrazino[1,2-a]indole-1,4-diones 6, even on prolonged exposure
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2012.01.016.
References
1 (a) I. Ugi, B. Werner and A. Dömling, Molecules, 2003, 8, 53; (b) A. Dömling
Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 17; (c) L. El Kaim and L. Grimaud, Tetrahedron,
2009, 65, 2153.
,
2 (a) I. Akritopoulou-Zanze and S. W. Djuric, Heterocycles, 2007, 73, 125
and references cited therein; (b) A. V. Ivachtchenko, Ya. A. Ivanenkov,
V. M. Kysil, M. Yu. Krasavin and A. P. Ilyin, Usp. Khim., 2010, 79, 861
(Russ. Chem. Rev., 2010, 79, 787); (c) S. Sadjadi and M. M. Heravi,
Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 2707.
3 (a) M. Krasavin, S. Shkavrov, V. Parchinsky and K. Bukhryakov, J. Org.
Chem., 2009, 74, 2627; (b) M. Krasavin, V. Parchinsky, A. Shumsky,
I. Konstantinov and A. Vantskul, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 1367;
(c) E. Lakontseva and M. Krasavin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 4095;
(d) M. Krasavin and V. Parchinsky, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 5657.
4 M. Krasavin, M. Nikulnikov, S. Tsirulnikov, V. Kysil and A. Ivachtchenko,
Synlett, 2009, 260.
†
General procedure for the preparation of compounds 7 and 8. Com-
pound 2 (0.5 mmol) synthesized as described previously,4 was dissolved
in dioxane (2 ml) and treated with an amine (0.6 mmol). The reaction
mixture was stirred at ambient temperature overnight. The solvent was
removed under reduced pressure and the target amide 7 (8) was isolated
by column chromatography on silica gel using an appropriate gradient of
methanol in dichloromethane as eluent.
For 8a: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) d: 13.37 (s, 1H), 7.65 (d, 2H,
J 7.7 Hz), 7.27 (d, 2H, J 7.7 Hz), 7.04–7.19 (m, 4H), 6.93 (m, 1H), 6.76
and 6.58 (AB qd, 4H, J 8.3 Hz), 5.09 (s, 1H), 4.42 (s, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H),
3.09–3.57 (m, 8H), 2.84 (m, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 1.17 (d, 6H, J 6.9 Hz),
1.07 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 Hz) d: 167.2, 167.0, 163.9, 157.4,
154.5, 151.6, 148.3, 139.2, 137.1, 131.3, 130.9, 130.2, 129.6, 129.4, 128.7,
127.8, 126.5, 126.0, 125.4, 125.2, 112.8, 66.1, 65.5, 54.9, 33.2, 23.9, 23.7,
20.9. Found (%): C, 72.24; H, 6.83; N, 9.92. Calc. for C34H38N4O4 (%): C,
72.06; H, 6.76; N, 9.89.
5 M. Nikulnikov, Ph.D. Thesis, A. N. Kosygin Moscow State Textile
University, Moscow, 2010.
6 M. M. Nikulnikov and M. Yu. Krasavin, Izv. Vys. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim.
Khim. Tekhnol., 2010, 53 (4), 51 (in Russian).
7 K. Itoh and S. Kanemasa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 13394.
8 B. S. Jursic and Z. Zdravkovski, J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM, 1994, 303,
177.
For characteristics of compounds 7a–d and 8b–h, see Online Supple-
mentary Materials.
Received: 4th July 2011; Com. 11/3755
– 42 –