A. D. Schlꢀter et al.
pounds were carried out under nitrogen using standard Schlenk tech-
niques and dry solvents. All commercial reagents were used without fur-
ther purification. Solvents were purified and dried by standard proce-
dures.
strainless) naphthalenic moieties in 1c-1, whereas the same
moieties are somewhat curved in 1c-2. This curvature causes
each subunit to be slightly strained (i.e., less than 2.4 kcal
molꢀ1), but this adds up to almost 10 kcalmolꢀ1 for the four
naphthalene subunits and probably accounts for the experi-
mental isolation of only 1c-1.
Analytical methods
Chromatography: Reactions and columns were monitored by thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) using TLC silica gel coated aluminium plates 60
UV254 (Merck “Kieselgel 60” or Macherey–Nagel with fluorescence indi-
cator F254) and visualized by ultraviolet light (l=254 and 366 nm).
As mentioned in the results section, 1b is completely
stable under the conditions used for the conversion of 1a
into 2a. It is rather unlikely that the thermodynamics of the
elimination changes dramatically with the substituents (i.e.,
a vs. b). However, the kinetics may change due to stabiliza-
tion or destabilization of reactive intermediates (probably
cations, or, less likely but still possible, radicals), which may
open up different reaction channels. Under more forceful
conditions the elimination proceeded to completion but the
product could not be identified. The computational results
suggest an endothermicity of 44 kcalmolꢀ1 for this elimina-
tion. Assuming a value of DS of 30–40 entropy units for the
reaction, this means that the elimination of the third water
molecule from 2 will have a negative free energy of reaction
at temperatures of 830–11908C. The calculations were car-
ried out in the gas phase and solvent may change the entro-
py of the reaction. However, because the reaction was car-
ried out at 1608C, obtaining the product would suggest that
DS for the elimination reaction is +102 entropy units, an
unreasonable number for such a reaction. Alternatively, if
30–40 entropy units for the elimination are assumed, it im-
plies that the DH of the reaction is not larger than around
13–17 kcalmolꢀ1. It is unlikely that the error in the calcula-
tions is so large. Therefore, the calculations of the dehydra-
tion presented above do not support the formation of 4b
under the forceful elimination conditions. Rather, the option
that is described in Scheme 1 (in which 6b may lose a water
molecule in the MS) or a (cationic or radical) polymeri-
zation of the cyclic skeleton under these conditions seem to
be more reasonable option.
1
NMR spectroscopy: H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
AVANCE 300 (1H: 300 MHz; 13C: 75 MHz) or AVANCE 500 (1H:
500 MHz; 13C: 125 MHz) spectrometer at normal probe temperatures
using [D]chloroform, 1,1,2,2-[D2]tetrachloroethane, or [D5]nitrobenzene.
Signals of residual nondeuterated solvent molecules or TMS were used
as internal standard for the calibration of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
Solid-state NMR measurements were performed on a Varian InfinityPlus
console using a Chemagnetics 4 mm double-resonance MAS probehead
and vortex tube cooling. A standard variable-amplitude cross polariza-
tion sequence with XIX proton decoupling (120 kHz rf amplitude) during
the acquisition was applied. Saturation pulses were applied before each
scan to ensure the same initial condition. A contact time of 2 and 4 ms
was chosen. A high-order baseline correction was applied to remove the
background signal from the probehead. This was found to be more reli-
AHCTUNGERTGaNNUN ble than a background subtraction. All data were processed by using the
matNMR processing toolbox.
Mass spectrometry: High-resolution mass spectra were recorded by the
MS service of the Laboratorium fꢀr Organische Chemie at ETH Zꢀrich
on a Varian IonSpec Ultima MALDI-FT-ICR, a Bruker Daltonics Ultra-
Flex II MALDI-TOF, or a Waters Micromass Autospec Ultima EI-EBE-
triSector instrument. trans-2-[3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-propenyli-
dene]malononitrile (DCTB) and 3-hydroxypyridine-2-carboxylic acid (3-
HPA) served as matrices for MALDI mass spectrometry.
UV/Vis spectroscopy: UV/Vis spectra were recorded at room temperature
on a Perkin–Elmer Lambda 19 instrument using standard 1 cm quartz
glass cuvettes.
EPR spectroscopy: The EPR spectra were measured with an ElexSys
E680 X-/W-band dual frequency spectrometer (Bruker Biospin GmbH)
in X-band mode at typical microwave frequencies of 9.7 GHz. An elec-
tron-nuclear double resonator EN 4118X-MD-4 (Bruker Biospin GmbH)
was used for both continuous wave (CW) EPR and Mims ENDOR mea-
AHCTUNGERTGsNNUN urements. For CW EPR the resonator was critically coupled, whereas it
was overcoupled to Qꢂ100 to obtain sufficiently short dead times in
Mims ENDOR. For Mims ENDOR a model 250A250A radiofrequency
amplifier with a maximum power of 250 W (Amplifier Research, Inc.)
was used. Measurement temperatures of 160 K for CW EPR and 80 K
for Mims ENDOR were maintained with a CF935 cryostat and ITC 503S
temperature controller (Oxford Instruments). Saturation behavior was
checked for all samples in CW EPR experiments. An attenuation of
30 dB (microwave power of 0.2 mW) was found to be sufficient to avoid
separation. Determination of spin concentration was double checked at
40 dB attenuation (0.02 mW). Glassy frozen solutions of 2,2,6,6-tetrame-
thylpiperidin-1-yloxyl (TEMPO) were used as concentration standards
and for g value reference. Modulation amplitudes of 0.1 or 0.2 mT peak-
to-peak were used according to line width. In Mims ENDOR, the pulse
lengths were 20 ns for microwave p/2 pulses and 12 ms for the radiofre-
quency pulse, the range from 7–22 MHz was scanned to detect all proton
ENDOR signals.
Conclusion
High-resolution mass spectra that match fully conjugated
double-stranded cycles 4b and 4c were obtained. In contrast
with their hexyl-substituted congener 4a, these two cycles
(phenyl-substituted and parent) do not have the option to
undergo a [1,5] hydrogen shift that would lead to a disrup-
tion of conjugation. It is, therefore, concluded that these in-
triguing, long-sought-for aromatic belt-type compounds
were generated for the first time, at least in the gas phase.
Although cycle 4a could be trapped with phenanthroline, at-
tempts to isolate products 4a–4c failed.
Syntheses
Tetraphenyl-buckybelt (4b): A suspension of the tetraphenyl-buckybelt
tetrahydrate 1b (20 mg, 0.02 mmol) in nitrobenzene (10 mL) was heated
to 1608C. Upon addition of trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (25 mL,
0.29 mmol) the mixture turned black instantaneously. After 2 h, the sol-
vent and acid were removed by using a rotary evaporator and the residu-
al black material was washed with toluene (5ꢅ2 mL) and dried in high
vacuum.
Experimental Section
The procedures for the synthesis of compounds 1b and 1c are described
in the Supporting Information. All compounds of the hexyl route have
previously been described.[7a] All reactions involving air-sensitive com-
CPMAS 13C NMR (220 MHz): d=140–110 (peaks at d=138, 128, and
120 ppm).
12172
ꢂ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12163 – 12174