112
A. Mrutu et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 18 (2012) 110–112
be obtained from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
article can be found online at doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2012.01.030.
References
[1] K. Issleib, H.P. Abicht, J. Prakt. Chem. 312 (1970) 456–465.
[2] W. Kantlehner, Sci. Synth. 22 (2005) 843–849.
[3] F.R. Allen, Acta Crystallogr. B58 (2002) 380–388.
[4] D.J. Darensbourg, D.J. Zalewski, Organometallics 4 (1985) 92–97.
[5] D.J. Darensbourg, D.J. Zalewski, A.L. Rheingold, R.L. Durney, Inorg. Chem. 25
(1986) 3281–3290.
[6] A.A. Bahsoun, J.A. Osborn, P.H. Bird, D. Nucciarone, A.V. Peters, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. (1984) 72–73.
[7] J.T. Mague, S.E. Dessens, J. Organomet. Chem. 262 (1984) 347–358.
[8] E.J. Fernández, J.M. López-de-Luzuriaga, M. Monge, E. Olmos, A. Laguna, M.D.
Villacampa, P.G. Jones, J. Cluster Sci. 11 (2000) 153–167.
[9] Y. Takahashi, M. Akita, Y. Moro-Oka, Chem. Commun. (1997) 1557–1558.
[10] H. Xiao, Y.-X. Weng, W.-T. Wong, T.C.W. Mak, C.-M. Che, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. (1997) 221–226.
[11] J. Fornies, R. Navarro, E.P. Urriolabeitia, J. Organomet. Chem. 452 (1993) 241–246.
[12] J.D. Goodrich, J.P. Selegue, Organometallics 4 (1985) 798–800.
[13] H.J. Kakkonen, M. Ahlgrèn, T.A. Pakkanen, J. Pursiainen, J. Organomet. Chem. 518
(1996) 203–211.
[14] M.J. Siwajek, W. Wu, R.A. Walton, Inorg. Chim. Acta 235 (1995) 421–425.
[15] M. Abou Rida, C. Copéret, A.K. Smith, J. Organomet. Chem. 628 (2001) 1–10.
[16] H. Schmidbaur, A. Stützer, E. Herdtweck, Chem. Ber. 124 (1991) 1095–1100.
[17] F.L. Campbell, F.A. Cotton, G.L. Powell, Inorg. Chem. 23 (1984) 4222–4226.
[18] E.J. Fernandez, M.C. Gimeno, P.G. Jones, A. Laguna, M. Laguna, E. Olmos, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. (1994) 2891–2898.
Fig. 3. Molecular structure of 2b with thermal ellipsoids projected at 50% level. Hydro-
gen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (A) and angles (°):
W1\C1 1.971(5), W1\C2 1.952(7), W1\N1 2.179(6) , W1\P1 2.4866(10); C2\W1\C1
88.17(18), C2\W1\N1 178.8(2), C1\W1\N1 91.04(17), C1\W1\P1 99.07(13),
P1\W1\P1 67.23(5), C13\P1\W1 118.94(14), C7\P1\W1 122.51(13).
The structure consists of W1\C1 and W1\C2 distances of 1.971(5) Å
and 1.952(7) Å, respectively. The W\C bond lengths of complex 2b
are closely related to those previously observed in the literature
[29]. Aditionally, the W1\P1 and W1\N1 bond lengths are
2.4866(10) Å and 2.179(6) Å, respectively. The W\P bond distance
found in complex 2b is slightly shorter than the values observed in
other tungsten complexes [24,29,30].
In summary, we have prepared and fully-characterized rare Mo
and W metal complexes that contain tdppm ligand acting as a tradi-
tional bidentate ligand. The coordination mode observed in com-
plexes 2a and 2b by X-ray crystallography confirms that the tdppm
ligand acts as a chelating ligand to Group 6 metals, with three CO's
and one EtCN ligand filling out the distorted octahedral coordination
sphere. The present work has helped fill the void in solid-state char-
acterization of directly bound tdppm-W and Mo complexes. Impor-
[19] Preparation of 2a: the tpddm (Ph2P)3CH ligand (0.30 g, 0.52 mmol) was added to
a 100 ml Schlenk flask containing 10 ml of toluene in an inert atmosphere. This
was followed by dropwise addition of 1a (0.18 g, 0.52 mmol) dissolved in 10 ml
of propionitrile. The solution was sonicated for 5 min and then allowed to stir
for additional 12 h. The precipitate formed was separated from the solution
using a fine filter frit. The solid was washed with diethyl ether (10 ml×3) then
dried under vacuum. The yield of 2a was 0.30 g [65% isolated, crystalline product
based on Mo(CO)3(EtCN)3]. Analytically pure crystals of 2a were obtained by re-
crystallization from CH2Cl2. Complex 2a decomposed at 188 °C. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2,
3
300 MHz, ppm): 6.43–7.76 (m, Ar-H, 30H), 4.75 (s, CH, 1H), 1.32 (q, JH − H
=
7.5 Hz, CH2, 2H), 1.03 (t, JH − H =7.5 Hz, CH3, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2,
3
75 MHz, ppm): 175.2, 154.3, 129.5, 124.9, 59.3, 58.6, 58.1. 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2,
2
2
121.49 MHz, ppm): 24.2 (d, JP − P =23 Hz), −23.0 (t, JP − P =23 Hz). Anal.
Calcd: C 64.27, H 4.52, N 1.74. Found: C 64.25, H 4.37, N 1.39. IR: υCO =1930,
1785 cm−1. Compound 2b was prepared similarly in 70% yield. 2b decomposed
at 180 °C. 1H NMR (CD3COCD3, 300 MHz, ppm): 6.8–7.9 (m, Ar-H, 30H), 5.60 (s,
CH, 1H), 2.57 (q, JH − H =6.6 Hz, CH2, 2H), 1.13 (t, JH − H =6.6 Hz, CH3, 3H). 31P
3
3
{1H} NMR (CD3COCD3, 121.49 MHz, ppm): 2.1 (d, 2JP−P=25 Hz), −23.1 (t, 2JP−P
25 Hz). Anal. Calcd: C 57.80, H 4.07, N 1.57. Found: C 56.84, H 4.19, N 1.25. IR:
CO =1890, 1770 cm−1
=
tantly, using
a Group 6 starting material M(CO)3(EtCN)3 that
υ
.
eventually results in a weakly coordinated EtCN group remaining on
the complex, clearly has an advantage over M(CO)6-derived com-
plexes in that further substitution chemistry is facilitated.
[20] J. Chatt, H.R. Watson, J. Chem. Soc. (1961) 4980–4988.
[21] G.M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. A64 (2008) 112–122.
[22] Diffraction data were obtained on a Bruker X8 ApexII κ-axis diffractometer with
graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å) and a CCD camera.
The intensity data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. The struc-
ture was solved using direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares
methods on F2. All hydrogens were added in idealized positions and not allowed
to vary. Crystal structure analysis for 2a: C43H36MoNO3P3, Fw 803.63, orthorhom-
bic, Pnma, a=16.5384(3) Å, b=20.6593(4) Å, c=11.3661(2)Å, α=β=γ=90˚,
V=3883.48(12) Å3, Z=4, F(000)=1648.0, T=188(2) K, green rods, 0.25×
0.07×0.07 mm3, μ=0.501 mm−1, Dx=1.374 g/cm3, 2θ-range 0.998 to 30.56°,
independent reflections 84431, wR (all data) 0.0885, R1[I>2(I)] 0.0753. Crystal
Acknowlegments
For financial support of this project we acknowledge the American
Chemical Society–Petroleum Research Fund via a grant to RAK
(48822-ND3). The Bruker X-ray diffractometer was purchased via a
National Science Foundation CRIF:MU award to the University of
New Mexico (CHE04-43580), and the NMR spectrometers were
upgraded via grants from the NSF (CHE08-40523 and CHE09-
46690). We also thank Dr. Eileen Duesler of UNM for assistance
structure analysis for 2b:
a=16.4570(5), b=20.7161(6),
V=3859.0(2) Å3, Z=4, F(000)=1776.0, T=188(2) K, yellow planks,
0.25×0.02×0.02 mm3, μ=3.158 mm−1 Dx=1.534 g/cm3, 2θ-range 0.998 to
C43H35WNO3P3, Fw 891.49, orthorhombic, Pnma,
c=11.3192(4) Å, α=β=γ=90°,
,
28.360°, independent reflections 4929, wR (all data) 0.0734, R1[I>2(I)] 0.0618.
[23] G. Hogarth, J. Kilmartin, J. Organomet. Chem. 692 (2007) 5655–5670.
[24] K.K. Cheung, T.F. Lai, K.S. Mok, J. Chem. Soc. A (1971) 1644–1647.
[25] K.J. Beckett, S.J. Loeb, Can. J. Chem. 66 (1988) 1073–1080.
[26] D.S. Payne, J.A.A. Mokuolu, J.C. Speakman, Chem. Commun. (London) (1965) 599-599.
[27] H. Luth, M.R. Truter, A. Robson, J. Chem. Soc. A (1969) 28–41.
[28] R.H.B. Mais, P.G. Owston, D.T. Thompson, J. Chem. Soc. A (1967) 1735–1743.
[29] G.W. Wong, J.L. Harkreader, C.A. Mebi, B.J. Frost, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2006)
6748–6755.
with X-ray data analysis. Sandia is
a multiprogram laboratory
operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for
the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-
AC04-94AL85000.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
[30] W.A. Schenk, K. Nielsen, N.I. Burzlaff, M. Hagel, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002)
1079–1085.
The structural data for 2a and 2b have been deposited as CCDC
851857 and 851858. These data are available free of charge and can