elaborated fullerene dimers generally suffered from the
limited scope of functional groups, low chemical yields,
harsh reaction conditions, and use of large excess amounts
of toxic reagents or additives. Recent advances in the
catalytic functionalization of fullerene9 triggered us to
explore the highly efficient catalytic dimerization of hydro-
fullerenes which may offer advantages such as high che-
mical yields and selectivity as well as high functional group
compatibility under mild conditions.
Scheme 1. Cu(OAc)2- and NaOH-Catalyzed Dimerization of
Hydrofullerenes 1 for Synthesis of Single-Bonded [60]Fullerene
Dimers 2
Most recently, we found that the Cu(OAc)2 catalyst
combined with a small amount of DMF as a cosolvent
under air was crucial for dramatic enhancement of the
dimerization efficiency of monosubstituted hydrofuller-
enes (RHC60) (1),9m affording the corresponding fullerene
dimers 2 in high yields (Scheme 1).10 The reaction most
as-prepared NaOH (10 mol %) by using ODCB (ortho-
dichlorobenzene) as a sole solvent in air at rt did not
proceed, and 1a was recovered almost quantitatively
(Table 1, entry 1). The remarkable enhancement of effi-
ciency by adding DMF or CH3CN, which was reported by
our previous Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed dimerization,10 led us to
examine the notable cosolvent effect on the present dimer-
ization. To our delight, addition of the polar cosolvents,
such as DMF, THF, and CH3CN, improved the yields of
the corresponding dimer 2a drastically to 89%, 95%, and
90%, respectively (entries 2ꢀ4), although we reported
previously that the use of THF as a cosolvent combined
with the Cu(OAc)2 catalyst afforded only a 20% yield
of 2a.10 Addition of less-coordinative cosolvents, such as
toluene or chloroform, did not exert any influences on
the reaction efficiency (entries 5 and 6). Previously, we
also reported that the use of a catalytic or stoichiometric
amount of Cu(OAc)2 in the absence of air produced the
corresponding dimer 2a in 14% and 93% yields, res-
pectively.10 Interestingly, in sharp contrast to these results,
the present NaOH-mediated dimerization did not afford
the corresponding dimer 2a with either a catalytic or
stoichiometric amount of NaOH (entries 7 and 8). These
results not only indicate that air play as an important role
in the generation of monomer radical RC60• but also imply
that the present NaOH-catalyzed dimerization might form
probably proceeds through the Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed gen-
•þ
•
eration of a fullerenyl radical cation species (RHC60
followed by formation of a fullerenyl monoradical RC60
)
.
However, the drawback of toxic copper contamination of
the products and solvents may preclude its use in materials
science and practical synthetic application.11 Taking these
points into consideration, we envisioned that by using the
suitable, nontoxic base as a catalyst in the presence of air
and cosolvent, the catalytic dimerization of RHC60 (1)
should be accomplished through the generation of mono-
ꢀ
anion RC60 with base treatment followed by formation
of RC60• by one-electron oxidation.5d,12 Herein, we report
unprecedented, efficient, and nontoxic NaOH-catalyzed
homo- and cross-dimerizations of monofunctionalized
hydrofullerenes 1 that afford the single-bonded fullerene
dimers 2 as a mixture of racemic and meso isomers in
excellent yields in the presence of air and tetrahydrofuran
(THF) cosolvent under mild reaction conditions
(Scheme 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
example for transition-metal-free catalytic functionalization
of fullerenes which provides an alternative and promising
method for catalytic dimerization of hydrofullerenes,
meeting the requirements for both green chemistry and
fullerene chemistry.
In the preliminary experiment, we found that the homo-
dimerization of monosubstituted 1a in the presence of an
•
RC60 in a completely different way from the Cu(OAc)2-
catalyzed reaction. To gain further insight into the role of
bases, we examined various base catalysts. Strong inor-
ganic bases, such as KOMe, KOtBu, CsOH, and KOH,
produced the corresponding fullerene dimer 2a in high
yields (entries 9ꢀ12), while other inorganic bases having a
relatively lower basicity, such as LiOH and Na2CO3, are
less active (entries 13 and 14). Strong organic base Me4-
NOH produced 2a in a short reaction time (2 h), but the
yield was lower than that of NaOH (entry 15). The weaker
organic base Et3N showed low catalytic activity regardless
of the prolonged reaction time (entry 16). It is clear that the
reaction did not proceed without base catalysts (entry 17).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand,
various monosubstituted hydrofullerenes 1 were examined
as shown in Table 2. A variety of functional groups in hydro-
fullerenes 1 were tolerated under the present NaOH-
catalyzed dimerization conditions, affording the corre-
sponding single-bonded fullerene dimers 2 in very high
(9) (a) Martın, N.; Altable, M.; Filippone, S.; Martın-Domenech, A.;
´ ´
ꢀ
Poater, A.; Sola, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2716. (b) Matsuo, Y.;
Iwashita, A.; Nakamura, E. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 858. (c) Nambo, M.;
Noyori, R.; Itami, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8080. (d) Mori, S.;
Nambo, M.; Chi, L.-C.; Bouffard, J.; Itami, K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4609.
(e) Nambo, M.; Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S.; Itami, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 15112. (f) Nambo, M.; Itami, K. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15,
4760. (g) Zhu, B.; Wang, G.-W. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4426. (h) Zhu,
B.; Wang, G.-W. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4334. (i) Filippone, S.; Maroto,
E. E.; Martın-Domenech, A.; Suarez, M.; Martın, N. Nat. Chem. 2009,
´ ´
1, 578. (j) Xiao, Z.; Matsuo, Y.; Nakamura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
ꢁ
132, 12234. (k) Maroto, E. E.; de Cozar, A.; Filippone, S.; Martın
o, F. P.; Martın, N. Angew. Chem., Int.
´
ꢁ
Domenech, A.; Suarez, M.; Cossı
´
´
Ed. 2011, 50, 6060. (l) Martın, N.; Altable, M.; Filippone, S.; Martın
´
´
ꢁ
Domenech, A.; Echegoyen, L.; Cardona, C. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 110. (m) Lu, S.; Jin, T.; Bao, M.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 12842.
(10) Lu, S.; Jin, T.; Kwon, E.; Bao, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 802.
(11) Brewer, G. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121, 459.
(12) (a) Wallace, T. J.; Schriesheim, A.; Bartok, W. J. Org. Chem.
1963, 28, 1311. (b) Wallace, T. J.; Schriesheim, A. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27,
1514.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 13, 2012
3467