selectively affords C-2 substituted chromenes.13,14 This
organocatalytic Petasis-like reaction uses functional group
tolerant boronate esters but is only effective for intrinsi-
cally nucleophilic partners such as cinnamyl and π-rich
arenes. For these reasons, a concise, efficient, and general
method for the synthesis of chromenes is still in demand.
of quinoline-derived N,O-acetals20 and styrenyl epoxides.21
Our preliminary mechanistic data indicated that in these
systems Csp3ÀO oxidative addition is promoted by Lewis
acid complexation of the boronic acid to the Lewis basic
oxygen of the electrophile. Inspired by these findings, we
decided to pursue the possibility that boronic acid
activation22 of an allylic acetal in the absence of a base
would encourage selective oxidative addition and trans-
metalation. A particularly attractive aspect of this ap-
proach is that it would afford a neutral method for the
synthesis of allylic ethers from widely available and stable
precursors.23
Scheme 1. Synthetic Strategies for Chromene Synthesis
Figure 1. Pharmacologically active and photochromic chro-
mene derivatives.
Herein, we report such a method: a nickel-catalyzed
cross-coupling reaction of aryl- and heteroarylboronic
acids with chromene acetals. The method represents a
mechanistic alternative to nucleophilic acetal substitution
that enables access to a broad range of previously inacces-
sible C-2 substituted chromenes by late-stage diversifica-
tion of a common scaffold. To our knowledge, it also
represents the first example of a SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-
coupling reaction with allylic acetals.
Although recent reports have described SuzukiÀ
Miyaura reactions with allylic phenoxides, acetates, and
carbonates,15 the use of allylic acetals in cross-coupling has
been limited to Kumada16 and Negishi17 reactions. Slow
oxidative addition of electron-rich Csp3ÀO bonds to a
transition metal18 and the preponderance of such bonds
in the substrate as well as the product of acetal cross-
coupling are two likely causes for this comparative lack of
success.19 We recently reported SuzukiÀMiyaura reactions
In an initial demonstration of this hypothesis, we chose
to evaluate chromene-based acetals for the preparation of
2-substituted 2H-chromenes (Scheme 1). Subjecting
2-ethoxy-2H-chromene 1a to 10 mol % Ni(cod)2, 10 mol %
PPh3, and 2 equiv of p-fluorophenyl boronic acid at rt in
dioxane/t-AmOH as solvent afforded the desired cross-
coupled heterocycle 3 in 92% yield (Figure 2). In the
absence of the Ni catalyst, 3 was not observed, even when
the reaction was conducted at elevated temperatures
(<5% yield). Furthermore, it was found that the type of
organoboron nucleophile employed significantly affected
the reaction outcome. The use of boronate esters or
potassium aryltrifluoroborate salts also did not afford
the desired product. Since these boronates are less Lewis
acidic than boronic acids the results provide circumstantial
support for the role of the boronic acid in activating the
acetal toward oxidative addition. Notably, the chromene
acetals possess two distinct ethereal leaving groups, but
selective activation of the more Lewis basic exocyclic ether
is observed. The reaction is also regioselective, delivering
(13) Moquist, P. N.; Kodama, T.; Schaus, S. E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 7096–7100.
(14) For a related approach, see: Doodeman, R.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.;
Hiemstra, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5979–5983.
(15) For a review, see: (a) Pigge, F. Synthesis 2010, 2010, 1745–1762.
For specific examples, see: (b) Nishikata, T.; Lipshutz, B. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12103–12105. (c) Chung, K.-G.; Miyake, Y .;
Uemura, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 15–18. (d) Kobayashi,
Y.; Mizojiri, R.; Ikeda, E. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5391–5399.
(16) (a) Wenkert, E.; Ferreira, T. W. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1670–
1673. (b) Sugimura, H.; Takei, H. Chem. Lett. 1985, 351–354. (c)
Moineau, C.; Bolitt, V.; Sinou, D. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1103–1104.
(d) Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Heron, N. M.; Didiuk, M. T.; Luchaco, C. A.;
Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7649–7650. (e) Guagnano,
V.; Lardicci, L.; Malanga, C.; Menicagli, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
2025–2026. (f) Moineau, C.; Bolitt, V.; Sinou, D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
582–591.
(17) Chatterjee, S.; Negishi, E. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3406–3408.
(18) Yamashita, Y.; Gopalarathnam, A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 7508–7509.
(21) Nielsen, D. K.; Doyle, A. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
6056–6059.
(19) Rosen, B. M.; Quasdorf, K. W.; Wilson, D. A.; Zhang, N.;
Resmerita, A.-M.; Garg, N. K.; Percec, V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1346–
1416.
(20) Graham, T. J. A.; Shields, J. D.; Doyle, A. G. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2,
980–984.
(22) (a) Hall, D. G. Boronic Acids; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005. (b)
Zheng, H.; Lejkowski, M.; Hall, D. G. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1305–1310.
(23) (a) Vo, C.-V. T.; Mitchell, T. A.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 14082–14089. (b) Mitchell, T. A.; Bode, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 18057–18059.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 6, 2012
1617