S. Karabulut et al. / Catalysis Communications 41 (2013) 12–16
15
Table 3
optimum IPr/Ru ratio was 2:1. Methyl and methoxy substituted aro-
matic alkynes, 1b–e, were tested under same reaction conditions
and results were listed on Table 1. 4-methyl (1b) and 4-methoxy
(1d) substituted phenylacetylenes show high selectivity towards
enyne metathesis reactions and gave corresponding Diels–Alder ad-
ducts 3b (85%) and 3d (81%). On the other hand, 2-methyl (1c) and
2-methoxy (1e) substituted phenylacetylenes show relatively poor
selectivity towards enyne metathesis reaction and gave Diels–Alder
adducts, 3c (75%) and 3e (66%) in moderate yields. 4-octyne and
1-octyne were tested under the same reaction conditions. Although
the catalytic system worked efficiently for arylacetylenes, all attempts
to produce 1,3-dienes from 1-octyne and 4-octyne failed. Only a 2–3%
of diene product was observed for 1-octyne and 4-octyne. To expand
the scope of the process, different dienophiles were reacted with 2a
and results were given in Table 2. Maleic anhydride and N-phenyl
maleimide gave Diels–Alder adducts in 83% (3f) and 70% (3 g) yields
under pre-determined reaction conditions.
To expand the scope of this study, the activity of [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2/IPr was compared to that of other types of ruthenium cata-
lysts for the enyne metathesis reaction between phenylacetylene and
ethylene. For this purpose, several different classes of ruthenium cata-
lysts bearing IPr ligands were synthesized and their activity was tested
in tandem enyne metathesis/Diels–Alder reactions of phenylacetylene
(Table 3). For this purpose, a reactor was charged with the correspond-
ing ruthenium complexes (8% for Ru-I and II and 4% for Ru-III and IV)
and phenylacetylene in toluene and reacted under a slow stream of eth-
ylene at 80 °C for 2 h. Ru-I catalyzed the enyne metathesis reaction to
provide a 95% yield of 2a. Ru-II, a well-known ruthenium alkylidene
complex, catalyzed this reaction to give a 99% yield, whereas Ru-III,
the homobimetallic analog of Ru-II, provided a 96% yield. Our catalytic
system, Ru-IV, displayed comparable activity (93% yield) to the Ru-I,
II and III catalytic systems.
Tandem enyne metathesis/Diels–Alder reactions of phenylacetylene with various ru-
thenium catalysts.
Runa
Catalyst
Diene (2a) Diels-Alder Adduct
(3a) % b
b
%
1
95
83
2
3
99
96
90
88
4
93
80
a: All reactions were carried out in the presence of 8% [Ru-I] or [Ru-II] (0.066 mmol) or
4% [Ru-III] or [Ru-IV] (0.033 mmol) with phenylacetylene (0.66 mmol) in 3 ml of
toluene at 80 °C under an ethylene atmosphere (1 atm) and reacted for 2 h.
b: GC yield
After all of the reaction parameters were determined, the
switching ability of the catalytic system was investigated in detail.
First, phenylacetylene was allowed to react in the presence of 4%
[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 in toluene at 80 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere
to form the cyclotrimerization products 7a and 8a; then, IPr ligand
was added at different time intervals to switch the reaction to
enyne metathesis under an atmosphere of ethylene. The results are
listed in Table 3. When phenylacetylene was reacted for 5 min in
the presence of only [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2, the cyclotrimerization
product was formed in 3% (7a:8a; 90:10) yield. The addition of
2.0 mol equivalent of IPr ligand after 5 min shifted the product for-
mation towards 2a to give a 90% yield after 2 h; the amount of
cyclotrimerization product increased to 6% (7a:8a; 84:16). In addi-
tion, trace amounts of the dimerization product (2%) were also ob-
served in the GC-MS analysis. The IPr ligand was introduced into
the reaction medium at different time intervals to prove that our cat-
alytic system can be switched in situ from the cyclotrimerization
to 4:
1 didn’t have a beneficial effect on the reaction; only
cyclotrimerization (57%) and dimerization (43%) product distributions
were changed.
These observations indicated the need for ligands that are better σ
donors and sterically more hindered then PCy3 to stabilize the
14-electron ruthenium methylidene species. In this context, IPr, a
bulky NHC ligand was the best candidate with these characteristics.
Upon the addition of 2.0 equivalents of IPr relative to [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 and phenylacetylene in toluene at 80 °C, the product
distribution dramatically changed to provide a 93% yield of 2a. In-
creasing the IPr/Ru ratio to 4:1, 8:1 and 10:1 decreased the amount
of 2a to 89%, 80% and 76%, respectively. Upon the addition of 3 mole
equivalents of dimethylacetylenedicarboxylate, the corresponding
Diels–Alder adduct 3a was formed in 80% and 77% yield at the 2:1
and 4:1 IPr:Ru ratios, respectively, after 8 h at 80 °C. Thus, the
Table 4
In situ switchable selectivity of the [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2/IPr catalytic system between cyclotrimerization and enyne metathesis.
Before addition of IPr After addition of IPr
Runa
Timeb
(min.)
Dimer %c
(4a: 5a: 6a)
Cyclo %c
(7a: 8a)
Diene %c
Timed
(h)
Dimer %c
Diene %c
–
(4a: 5a: 6a)
(7a: 8a)
1
2
3
4
5
5
3 (90: 10)
6 (91: 9)
10 (89:11)
14 (90:10)
65 (90:10)
–
–
–
–
–
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
6 (84:16)
90
88
85
80
27
10
15
20
60
10 (83: 17)
12 (88:12)
17 (90: 10)
69 (90:10)
1
a: All reactions were carried out in the presence 4% [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (0.033 mmol) with phenylacetylene (72 μl, 0.66 mmol) in 3 ml of toluene at 80 °C under a nitrogen
atmosphere. IPr (0.026 g, 0.066 mmol) was added indicated times under an ethylene atmosphere (1 atm) to switch the reaction to enyne metathesis.
b: Represents the addition time of IPr
c: Determined by GC-MS
d: Represents the time when maximum conversion values were observed