have been reported.3 Yoshida et al. have provided compelling
evidence implicating protein kinase C (PKC) âII in the
activity of gnidimacrin, showing in one study that gnidima-
crin-insensitive cells can be rendered sensitive by PKCâII
transfection.5a-c Gnidimacrin is not alone in its fascinating
structure and therapeutic promise. Kirkinine B (2) (Figure
1), another 1R-alkyldaphnane, isolated from Synaptolepis
synthetic route to 1R-alkyldaphnanes and simplified deriva-
tives would introduce the macrocycle at the end of the
synthesis for maximum strategic flexibility. Because the role,
if any, of the macrocycle in biological activity is not known,
this approach was expected to allow access to both acyclic
and macrocyclic analogues as needed for comparative
evaluation. The ABC tricycle 3 was identified as a potentially
flexible precursor scaffold, as it incorporates differentiated
oxygen functionalities at C4, C5, C9, and C20 and latent
oxygen functionality at C3, C18, C13, and C14 in the form
of three selectively oxidizable alkenes (Scheme 1). Although
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 1R-Alkyldaphnanes
Figure 1. Some representative 1R-alkyldaphnanes.
kirkii, has been shown to have nanomolar activity against
K562/C1000 human leukemia cells, as well as significant
neurotrophic activity.6
Studies on the therapeutic potential of 1R-alkyldaphnanes
have been hampered by low isolation yields and at least
initially by the absence of validated cellular targets. Prompted
by our interest in unaddressed synthetic problems and in new
modes of therapeutic action, we initiated studies some time
ago to access analogues of the 1R-alkyldaphnanes and to
elucidate the structural determinants for their activity as
needed to further investigate their mode of action and clinical
potential. The synthetic challenges presented by this class
of compounds are highlighted by the fact that no work on
their synthesis has appeared and only one member of the
daphnane family, resiniferatoxin (RTX), has been success-
fully synthesized.7 This communication describes our initial
studies directed at accessing 1R-alkyldaphnane analogues
using a strategy that allows for introduction of variable
functionalities at sites potentially critical for biological
potency and selectivity.
the synthesis of a related 5-7-6 tricyclic core found in
phorbol10 and RTX has been reported, the introduction of a
C1 alkyl group and oxidation at C5 and C18 pose entirely
new and significant challenges. In principle, tricycle 3 would
arise from a metal-catalyzed closure of enyne 4 which in
turn would be generated from the conjunction of allylic
bromide 6 and enone 7 followed by C5 oxygenation.
Controlling stereogenesis at C10, C4, and C5 would be the
bridged bicyclic subunit in 7 that conformationally fixes and
sterically biases the hydropyranyl subunit. Bicycle 7 would
emerge from the known oxidopyrylium-alkene [5+2] cy-
cloaddition of pyrone 8.11
Although ultimately our strategy incorporates a C1 side
chain functionalized with an appropriate handle for late-stage
modifications, it was decided to start with incorporation of
a methyl group at C1 to validate our synthetic plan and
provide a reference control for testing biological activity.
Our synthesis starts with the preparation of the substrate
for the key oxidopyrylium [5+2] cycloaddition12 that estab-
As exemplified by our bryostatin analogue program,8 our
studies on the 1R-alkyldaphnanes are directed at achieving
step-economical syntheses of structurally simplified ana-
logues that exhibit functional activity comparable or superior
to the natural product lead. Connectivity analysis9 guided
by analogue design considerations suggested that a preferred
(5) (a) Yoshida, M.; Yokokura, K.; Hidaka, H.; Ikekawa, T.; Saijo, N.
Int. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 243-250. (b) Yoshida, M.; Feng, W. J.; Nishio,
K.; Takahashi, M.; Heike, Y.; Saijo, N.; Wakasugi, H.; Ikekawa, T. Int. J.
Cancer 2001, 94, 348-352. (c) Yoshida, M.; Heike, Y.; Ohno, S.; Ikekawa,
T.; Wakasugi, H. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 105, 601-606.
(6) He, W.; Cik, M.; Van Puyvelde, L.; Van Dun, J.; Appendino, G.;
Lesage, A.; Van der Lindin, I.; Leysen, J. E.; Wouters, W.; Mathenge, S.
G.; Mudida, F. P.; De Kimpe, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3245-
3255.
(7) Wender, P. A.; Jesudason, C. D.; Nakahira, H.; Tamura, N.; Tebbe,
A. L.; Ueno, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12976-12977.
(8) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Brenner, S. E.; Clarke, M. O.; Craske,
M. L.; Horan, J. C.; Meyer, T. Curr. Drug DiscoVery Technol. 2004, 1,
1-11.
(9) (a) Wender, P. A.; Miller, B. Org. Synth.: Theory Appl. 1993, 2, 27.
(b) Barone, R.; Chanon, M. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8916-8923.
(10) For the total synthesis of phorbol, see: (a) Wender, P. A.; Kogen,
H.; Lee, H. Y.; Munger, J. D.; Wilhelm, R. S.; Williams, P. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8957-8958. (b) Wender, P. A.; McDonald, F. E. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4956-4958. (c) Wender, P. A.; Rice, K. D.;
Schnute, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7897-7898. (d) Lee, K.;
Cha, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5590-5591.
(11) Wender, P. A.; Mascarenas, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6267-
6269.
(12) For reviews on oxidopyrylium [5+2] cycloadditions, see: (a) Elitzin,
V. I. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2005; pp 50-96.
(b) Sammes, P. G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1986, 116, 109-114. (c) Ohkata, K.;
Akiba, K.-Y. AdV. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 65, 283-374. (d) Chiu, P.;
Lautens, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 190, 1-85. (e) Mascaren˜as, J. L. AdV.
Cycloaddit. 1999, 6, 1-54.
1830
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 9, 2007