Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
EtOAc gradient) to afford 180 mg (0.26 mmol, 90% yield) of 16. [α]D25
+7.6 (c 1.0, CHCl3). IR (film): υ = 3089, 3064, 3031, 2925, 2855,
subcellular distribution, and cell metabolism properties required
for pharmacological chaperones.
1
2106, 1497, 1454, 1360, 1137, 1065, 1028, 734, 697 cm−1. H NMR
It is not yet clear how the optimization of concentrations or
the inhibitory potency of compounds for enzyme enhancement
in cell culture will translate to optimal chaperone doses in vivo.
What is remarkable is that the aminocyclitols reported here
afford potent GCase pharmacological enhancement of activity
at the lowest concentrations reported to date. Moreover, this
activity is extended to the L444P mutation, which produces a
severe neuronopathic form of GD that lacks an effective clinical
treatment. Further optimization of these amino-myo-inositols
and its ethers on other mutations and in animal models that
might lead to clinical candidates for therapy is warranted. In
addition, the structural determinants of the binding of these
high affinity inhibitors and the reasons for the activity
enhancement of a GCase enzyme mutated at an amino acid
distant from the active site are also of interest. These studies are
currently in progress.
(δ, 500 MHz, CDCl3): 0.91 (t, 3H, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.08−1.44 (m, 12H),
1.46−1.70 (m, 2H), 3.17 (dd, 1H, J = 10.3, 1.9 Hz), 3.41 (dd, 1H, J =
9.8, 1.8 Hz), 3.53 (t, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 3.67−3.71 (m, 1H), 3.88−3.92
(m, 2H), 3.99−4.04 (m, 2H), 4.73−4.97 (m, 8H), 7.26−7.42 (m,
20H). 13C NMR (δ, 100 MHz, CDCl3): 14.3, 22.8, 26.2, 29.5, 29.6,
29.8, 30.4, 32.1, 63.4, 73.1, 73.9, 75.7, 76.1, 77.1, 80.2, 81.6, 81.7, 84.5,
127.7−128.6, 138.15, 138.22, 138.56, 138.71. HRMS calculated for
C43H53N3O5Na, 714.3883 [M + Na]+; found, 714.3898.
General Procedure for the Reduction of Azides 12−13 and
15−16: Synthesis of 22 as a Representative Example. A solution
of the azide 16 (120 mg, 0.17 mmol) in anhydrous THF (4 mL) was
added dropwise under argon a solution of LiAlH4 (14 mg, 0.34 mmol)
in anhydrous THF (4 mL) at 0 °C. After stirring for 3 h at room
temperature, the mixture was cooled down to 0 °C and quenched with
dropwise addition of aqueous saturated Na2SO4 solution. The solution
was diluted with EtOAc, dried over MgSO4, and filtered through a plug
of Celite, which was washed three times with EtOAc. The combined
filtrates and washings were concentrated under reduced pressure to
give amine 22 (90 mg, 0.13 mmol, 80% yield), which was used in the
next reaction without further purification. [α]2D5 −47.1 (c 1.0, CHCl3).
IR (film): υ = 3080, 3060, 3033, 2924, 2854, 1497, 1454, 1362, 1090,
CONCLUSIONS
■
The synthesis of some N-alkyl amino-myo-inositol derivatives
has confirmed that this configuration results in compounds
with high affinity for the active site of GCase, the lysosomal
enzyme mutated in GD. Moreover, when an O-alkyl group is
present, the potency of the compounds is further increased,
leading to compounds with positive enzyme activity enhance-
ment in Gaucher L444P and N370S cells at subnanomolar
concentrations. The compounds obtained are highly selective
for GCase and reveal advantageous enzymatic and cellular
properties to support further studies as pharmacological
chaperones for GD.
1
1069, 1024, 732, 696 cm−1. H NMR (δ, 500 MHz, CDCl3): 0.92 (t,
3H, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.24−1.33 (m, 12H), 1.50−1.63 (m, 2H), 2.46 (d,
1H, J = 9.5 Hz), 3.40−3.64 (m, 4H), 3.80−3.83 (m, 1H), 3.98−4.07
(m, 2H), 4.67−5.04 (m, 8H), 7.24−7.35 (m, 20H). 13C NMR (δ, 100
MHz, CDCl3): 14.3, 22.8, 26.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.8, 30.6, 32.1, 54.3, 72.9,
73.6, 75.85, 75.86, 76.0, 78.1, 82.3, 83.0, 83.3, 85.1, 127.6−128.7,
138.4, 138.72, 138.73, 138.9. HRMS calculated for C43H56NO5,
666.4158 [M + H]+; found, 666.4156.
General Procedure for Reductive Amination: Synthesis of 28
as a Representative Example. A solution of the amine 22 (89 mg,
0.14 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL) under an atmosphere of argon was
treated successively with NaBH3CN (18 mg, 0.28 mmol), AcOH (8
μL), and nonanal (24 μL, 0.14 mmol). After stirring for 4 h at room
temperature, the mixture was quenched with water (0.2 mL) and the
solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The resulting residue
was dissolved in Et2O (20 mL) and washed with water (15 mL). The
aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined
organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and
evaporated to dryness to give a residue, which was purified by flash
chromatography (20:1 to 5:1 hexane/EtOAc gradient) to give 28 (85
mg, 0.11 mmol, 75% yield). [α]2D5 −18.4 (c 1.0, CHCl3). IR (film): υ =
3088, 3062, 3029, 2955, 2924, 2854, 1497, 1467, 1454, 1362, 1133,
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
Chemistry: General Methods. Solvents were distilled prior to use
and dried by standard methods. FT-IR spectra are reported in cm−1.
1
Unless otherwise stated, H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in
CDCl3 solutions at 500 MHz (for 1H) and 100 MHz (for 13C).
Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm relative to the residual solvent
peak (CDCl3: 1H, δ = 7.26 ppm; 13C, δ = 77.16 ppm), and the
coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz (Hz). Optical rotations
were measured with a Perkin-Elmer model 341 polarimeter, and
specific rotations are reported in 10−1 deg cm2 g−1. ESI/HRMS spectra
were recorded on a Waters LCT Premier mass spectrometer. The
purity of all tested compounds was >97% as determined by HPLC on
an Alliance 2695 system using a Kinetex C18 (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 2.6
μm) column under the following chromatography conditions: mobile
phase A, H2O with 0.2% HCO2H; mobile phase B, CH3CN with 0.2%
HCO2H; flow rate, 1.0 mL min−1; injection volume, 25 μL; elution
gradient, 0.0−2.9 min, 5−90% B; 2.9−3.4 min, 90% B; 3.4−4.6 min,
90−100% B; 4.6−6.0 min, 100−5% B; 6.0−10.0 min, 5% B. An
evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD, model PL-ELS 1000,
Polymer Laboratories) was used with the following parameters: a gas
flow rate of 1.5 L min−1, a nebulizer temperature of 80 °C, and an
evaporator temperature of 90 °C.
1
1088, 1070, 732, 696 cm−1. H NMR (δ, 500 MHz, CD3COCD3):
0.85−0.90 (m, 6H), 1.20−1.39 (m, 24H), 1.39−1.51 (m, 2H), 1.57−
1.63 (m, 2H), 2.50−2.70 (m, 2H), 2.75−2.90 (m, 1H), 3.48 (t, 1H, J =
9.1 Hz), 3.56 (dd, 1H, J = 9.8, 1.5 Hz), 3.64 (t, 1H, J = 9.4 Hz), 3.71
(dt, 1H, J = 9.0, 6.4 Hz), 3.84−3.88 (m, 1H), 3.91 (t, 1H, J = 9.5 Hz),
3.97 (dt, 1H, J = 8.9, 6.4 Hz), 4.14 (br s, 1H), 4.71−4.94 (m, 8H),
7.22−7.42 (m, 20H). 13C NMR (δ, 100 MHz, CD3COCD3): 14.4,
23.34, 23.37, 27.0, 28.1, 29.2, 29.9, 30.1, 30.3, 30.4, 30.5, 31.2, 32.6,
32.7, 48.4, 62.0, 73.0, 73.8, 75.3, 75.9, 76.0, 82.7 (2), 83.4, 85.6, 128.0−
129.0, 140.00, 140.30, 140.35, 140.45. HRMS calculated for
C52H74NO5, 792.5567 [M + H]+; found, 792.5578.
General Procedure for Debenzylation by Catalytic Hydro-
genation: Synthesis of Aminocyclitol 7 as a Representative
Example. In a glass pressure flask, the benzylated amino compound
28 (80 mg, 0.10 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of THF (3 mL) and
concentrated HCl (4 drops). Pd/C (40 mg, 5−15% Pd on activated C,
water-wet) was then added. The flask was repeatedly filled and
evacuated with hydrogen and vigorously stirred at room temperature
for 24 h under H2 (2 atm). The reaction mixture was next filtered
through a plug of Celite to separate the catalyst, and the filter was
washed three times with MeOH. The combined filtrates and washings
were concentrated to afford 43 mg (0.09 mmol, 92% yield) of 7 as the
hydrochloride salt. [α]D25 −18 (c 1.0, CH3OH). 1H NMR (δ, 500 MHz,
CD3OD): 0.88−0.96 (m, 6H), 1.25−1.42 (m, 24H), 1.60−1.80 (m,
General Procedure for the Alkylation of Azido Alcohols 11
and 14: Synthesis of 16 as a Representative Example. To a
solution of the azido alcohol 12 (163 mg, 0.29 mmol) in DMF (4 mL)
was added NaH (20 mg, 60% dispersion in mineral oil, 0.50 mmol) at
0 °C and stirred for 15 min. Then nonyl iodide (114 μL, 0.58 mmol)
was added, and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for additional 30 min.
The reaction was quenched by addition of few drops of water. The
mixture was diluted with 40 mL of Et2O and 40 mL of water. The
organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer extracted with Et2O
(3 × 40 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4,
filtrated, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting
residue was purified by column chromatography (20:1 to 6:1 hexane/
4485
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm300342q | J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4479−4488