272
J Chem Crystallogr (2012) 42:271–275
Finnigan DE-CAX-30000 LCQ Deca XP ion trap mass
spectrometer.
Table 1 Crystal data and structure refinement for 1ꢀ2DMF
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
C32H34N6O6
598.65
Preparation of Compound 1
298(2)
˚
Wavelength (A)
0.71073
Monoclinic
P2(1)/n
2,6-naphthalene-dicarbohydrazide (3 mmol, 0.732 g) was
added to EtOH solution (60 mL) containing salicylaldehyde
(6 mmol, 0.732 g). After 3 drops of acetic acid were added,
the yellow mixture was heated at boiling temperature under
magnetic stirring for 24 h. During the reaction, a yellow
precipitate was formed, which was collected by filtration.
Yield: 1.085 g, 80%. M.p.: 326–328 °C. Anal. calc. For
C26H20N4O4 (%): C, 69.02; H, 4.46; N, 12.38. Found (%):
C, 68.95; H, 4.50; N, 12.30. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3450, 3208,
Crystal system
Space group
˚
a = 10.454(1) A
Unit cell dimensions
˚
b = 7.711(9) A
˚
c = 18.801(2) A
b = 93.364(1)°
1512.9(3)
3
˚
Volume (A )
Z
2
1
Calculated density (Mg/m3)
Absorption coefficient (mm-1
F(000)
1.314
1665, 1608, 1445, 1410, 1285, 1028, 875, 465. H-NMR
)
0.093
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): 12.365 (s, 2H, –NH), 11.264
(s, 2H, –OH), 8.717 (s, 2H, –CH=N–), 8.649 (s, 2H, Ar–H),
8.250 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar–H), 8.101 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz,
Ar–H), 7.605 (d, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, Ar–H), 7.349 (m, 2H,
Ar–H), 6.954 (m, 4H, Ar–H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz,
DMSO-d6, ppm): 183.76 (–C(O)NH–), 168.11 (Ph-C–OH),
162.91 (–CH=N–), 153.85 (Ar–C), 138.98(Ar–C), 137.43
(Ar–C), 136.95(Ar–C), 134.86(Ar–C), 133.34(Ar–C),
130.67(Ar–C), 124.84(Ar–C), 124.18(Ar–C), 121.88(Ar–
C). ESI–MS: m/z 453.4 [M ? H?]. The high-quality yellow
single crystals of 1ꢀ2DMF suitable for X-ray diffraction
were obtained by recrystallization from N,N-dimethyl-
formamide (DMF).
632
Crystal size (mm3)
0.30 9 0.20 9 0.15
Theta range for data collection (°) 2.17–25.02
Limiting indices
-12 B h B 8, -9 B k B 9,
-22 B l B 22
Reflections collected/unique
Completeness to h = 25.02°
Absorption correction
7243/2675 (Rint = 0.0496)
99.9%
Multi-scan
Max. and min. transmission
Refinement method
0.9862 and 0.9727
Full-matrix least-squares on F2
2675/0/201
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit on F2
1.025
Final R indices [I [ 2r(I)]
R indices (all data)
R1 = 0.0861, wR2 = 0.2279
R1 = 0.1620, wR2 = 0.2980
0.847 and -0.333
X-Ray Crystallography
-3
)
˚
Largest diff. peak and hole (eA
A suitable yellow single-crystal with dimensions of
0.30 9 0.20 9 0.15 mm was selected for indexing and
intensity data collection on a Bruker smart-1000 CCD
diffractometer at 298(2) K using MoKa radiations (0.71073
parameters are given in Table 3. The molecular structure of
compound 1ꢀ2DMF is shown in Fig. 1, and the supramo-
lecular structure including the H-bonding interactions is
illustrated in Fig. 2.
˚
A). Multi-scan absorption corrections based on symmetry
equivalents were applied to the 7243 reflections collected
(2hmax = 50.04), 2675 unique reflections were observed
(Rint = 0.0496) after data reduction. The structure was
solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-
squares on F2 using SHELXL-97 program [11]. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen
atoms were located at calculated positions and refined
isotropically. The final refinement by full-matrix least
squares method was converged at R1 = 0.0861, and
wR2 = 0.2279 (R = R||Fo|-|Fc||/R|Fo|, wR = [Rw(F2o-
F2c)/Rw(F2o)2]1/2), S = 1.025, (D/r)max = 0.000. The larg-
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Spectral Characterization of Compound 1
As shown in Scheme 1, compound 1 was prepared by
Schiff base reaction of 2,6-naphthalene-dicarbohydrazide
and salicylaldehyde in ethanol with 3 drops of acetic acid.
The molecular formula of 1 is determined to be
C26H20N4O4 according to elementary analysis and ESI–MS
spectrum.
-3
˚
est peak in the final difference Fourier map is 0.847 eA
-3
The number of hydrogen atoms observed in the 1H-
˚
and the minimum peak is -0.333 eA
.
NMR spectrum of compound 1 is in agreement with this
1
molecular formula. In the H-NMR spectrum, two down-
The crystallography details for the structure determina-
tion and refinement for 1ꢀ2DMF are summarized in
Table 1, selected bond lengths and bond angles for com-
pound 1ꢀ2DMF are listed in Table 2, and hydrogen bond
field signals at 12.365 and 11.264 are ascribed to
–C(O)NH– and –OH, respectively. The signal at 8.717 is
123