Diamines derived from amino acids are attractive com-
pounds for catalyst design because of the rich availability
of the chiral amino acid starting materials.11 We therefore
prepared a series of diamines from L-valine (1a), L-phenyla-
lanine (1b), L-tert-leucine (1cÀ1f), and D-serine (1gÀ1i).
A series of chiral primary amine catalysts were first applied
in the conjugate addition of substituted rhodanine 3a to
benzalacetone. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Catalysts 1aÀc, which contained a tertiary amine moiety
derived from piperidine, clearly demonstrated behavior
consistent with catalytic activity and produced some en-
couraging results. These catalysts provided the anticipated
products in near complete conversion with excellent diaster-
eomeric ratios. Interestingly, the enantioselectivity of the
reaction was observed to be greatly dependent on the steric
hindrance around the primary amine group (Table 1, entries
1À3, from 0 to 70%). In contrast to catalysts containing the
piperidine moiety, the use of the more hindered diisopropy-
lamine moiety, as in catalyst 1e, destroyed the catalytic
activity, and only trace conversion was observed (Table 1,
entry 5). The use of the secondary diamine derived from
cyclohexamine, as in catalysts 1f and 1i, also gave poor
diastereoselectivity results (Table 1, entries 6 and 9). Pleas-
ingly, replacement of the tert-butyl group with the more
hindered methoxy-diphenylmethyl group led to significant
improvements in the levels of enantioselectivity observed.
For example, catalysts 1g and 1h provided the product with
an enantioselectivity of 88% ee in both cases. At the same
time, the diastereomeric ratios were maintained (dr 96:4),
and moderate to good levels of conversion were observed in
both cases (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). It is worthy of note that
extended reaction times were needed to obtain a good levels
of conversion. On the basis of these results, a 10 mol %
loading of catalyst 1h was selected for further screening.
Several different reaction solvents were assessed, and di-
chloroethane (DCE), methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), hexane,
dioxane, and xylene were all found to be suitable
for the model reaction. In contrast, the polar solvent
i-PrOH did not provide good levels of stereoselectivity
(Table 1, entry 15). Xylene was found to be the best solvent
with an enantioselectivity of 96% ee and a diastereo-
selectivity of 99:1 dr (Table 1, entry 14). The addition
of an acidic cocatalyst to the catalytic system also produced
the same high level of stereoselectivity in the Michael product
at a similar reaction rate (Table 1, entry 16), and the
enantioselectivity was slightly lower when compared with
the corresponding reaction performed without the acid.
Under the optimized reaction conditions, which included
a 10 mol % loading of catalyst 1h at 40 °C in xylene, the
scope of the reaction between different R,β-unsaturated
ketones 2 and rhodanine derivatives 3 was investigated
(Table 2). A variety of different substituents and different
positions of the aromatic rings on the enones were well
Scheme 1. Several Pharmaceutically Active Molecules That
Contain the Fragments of Rhodanine and Thiazolidonedione
Derivatives
structural motifs,6 MacMillan’s imidazolidinone with its
tert-butyl group7 and Jørgensen and Hayashi’s diarylproli-
nol silyl ether catalyst,8 we were interested in incorporat-
ing bulky groups into diamine catalysts. Furthermore,
we were interested in integrating iminium activation, avail-
ability, and tunability. Frequently used diamines, such as
1,2-diaminocyclohexane and 1,2-diphenyl-ethylenedia-
mine are rigid trans-diamines.9 In recent years, 9-amino-
9-deoxy-epi-cinchona alkaloids have emerged as one of
the most successful primary amine catalysts.10 However,
it is very difficult to introduce bulky groups into all three
of the backbones present within these systems to allow for
the introduction of tunable reactivity and stereoselectivity.
(5) (a) Jørgensen, K. A.; Johannsen, M.; Yao, S.; Audrain, H.;
Thorhauge, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 605. (b) Johnson, J. S.; Evans,
D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 325.
(6) (a) Sigman, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
4901. (b) Huang, H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7107.
(c) Doyle, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5713.
(7) (a) Austin, J. F.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 1173. (b) Ouellet, S. G.; Walji, A. M.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1327.
(8) (a) Marigo, M.; Wabnitz, T. C.; Fielenbach, D.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 794. (b) Hayashi, Y.; Gotoh, H.;
Ha-yashi, T.; Shoji, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4212. (c) Jensen,
K. L.; Dickmeiss, G.; Jiang, H.; Alberecht, Ł.; Jørgensen, K. A. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 248.
(9) For selected organocatalytic Michael reactions, see: (a) Kim, H.; Yen,
C.; Preston, P.; Chin, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5239. (b) Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Ge,
Z.; Cheng, T.; Li, R. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1751. (c) Wang, J.; Qi, C.;
Ge, Z.; Cheng, T.; Li, R. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2124.
(10) For selected examples catalyzed by 9-amino-9-deoxy-epi-cinch-
ona alkaloid, see: (a) Xie, J.; Chen, W.; Li, R.; Du, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.;
Zhu, J.; Deng, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 389. (b) McCooey,
S. H.; Connon, S. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 599. (c) Singh, R. P.; Bartelson,
K.; Wang, Y.; Su, H.; Lu, X.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
2422. (d) Wang, X.; Reisinger, C. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 6070. (e) Bencivennia, G.; Galzeranoa, P.; Mazzantia, A.; Bartolia,
G.; Melchiorreb, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 20642. (f)
Kwiatkowski, P.; Beeson, T. D.; Conrad, J. C.; MacMillan, D. W. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1738.
(11) For selected examples of nonbulky diamine catalysts derived
from amino acids, see: (a) Ishihara, K.; Nakano, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 10504. (b) Yang, Y.-Q.; Zhao, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14,
10888. (c) Hong, L.; Sun, W.; Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Wong, K.; Wang, R.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11105. (d) Huang, H.; Jin, Z.; Zhu, K.; Liang,
X.; Ye, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3232.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 8, 2012
2039