S. Blanchard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2880–2884
2883
100000
IV (5 mg/kg, n=3)
PO ( 50 mg/kg, n=3)
10000
1000
100
10
1
Figure 2. Compound 6 (bold tube with green carbon) docked into the PDK1 ATP-
binding site (thin tube with grey carbon). Hydrogen bonds are shown as yellow
dashed lines.
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
Time (h)
Figure 3. Oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of compound 6.
Replacement of the urea linker by an amide (18) had little effect
on potency whereas reversal of the amide group, as seen in 17 and
19, results in a dramatic loss of activity for PDK1, probably due to
the destruction of the NH—Leu88 H-bond. Comparison of 7 and the
ring expanded analogue 16 implies that small steric changes in the
urea do not affect the potency. For this second iteration of com-
pounds, although improved potency and solubility were achieved
permeability was seriously compromised (data not shown) render-
ing these compounds useful only as in vitro ligands with negligible
utility in cells. In our experience loss of permeability when the
number of H-bond donors exceeds three appears to be a particular
danger in PDK1 inhibitor design.11
Table 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters of compound 6
PK parameters
Cmax g/ml)
po (50 mg/kg)
iv (5 mg/kg)
(l
22
1
—
—
1.48
0.41
0.9
12
Tmax (h)
T1/2 (h)
1.84
CL (L/h/kg)
Vdz (L/kg)
0.63
1.7
AUC0–last
F %
(l
g h/ml)
79
65
—
Selected compounds were evaluated in cellular proliferation as-
says, metabolic stability in mouse and human liver microsomes
and Caco-2 permeability. All compounds had very good in vitro
metabolic stability (t1/2) as assessed in human and mouse liver
microsomes. Compounds 6 and 18 showed encouraging activity
against human tumor cell lines sensitive to the PI3K/Akt pathway,
such as the prostate cancer cell line PC3 (Table 3). However an
additional hydrogen bond and high polar surface area (128 Å2) ren-
dered 13 much less active than 6 or 18 in PC3 cells. This was not
unexpected from its negligible permeability which serves to ex-
plain the poor cellular activity. Although not apparently permeable
18 was still active in PC3 cells perhaps due to active transport, fur-
ther studies would be required to fully understand this activity.
From this data it is clearly preferred to maintain a maximum H-
bond donor count of three in these polar molecules and ensure glo-
bal polar surface area is below 120 Å2.
Compound 6 was also potent in another prostate cell line,
DU145, and in a breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB468, leading us
to select it for pharmacokinetic studies in the mouse. The results
are represented in Figure 3 and Table 4 and show that 6 has an
excellent pharmacokinetic profile in mice. A single oral dose re-
sults in rapid exposure with a high Cmax and good oral bioavailabil-
ity of 65%.
inhibition and a good understanding of the structural elements re-
quired for desirable drug-like properties.
Compound 6 represents a promising lead with good ADME
properties, cell proliferation inhibition and good oral bioavailabil-
ity in the mouse. Further studies of PDK1 inhibitors are under
investigation to fully elucidate their intracellular mechanism of
action.17
References and notes
1. Campbell, I. G.; Russell, S. E.; Choong, D. Y. H.; Montgomery, K. G.; Ciavarella, M.
L.; Hooi, C. S. F.; Cristiano, B. E.; Pearson, R. B.; Phillips, W. A. Cancer Res. 2004,
64, 7678.
2. Levine, D. A.; Bogomolniy, F.; Yee, C. Y.; Lash, A.; Barakat, R. R.; Borgen, P. I.;
Boyd, J. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 2875.
3. Vivanco, I.; Sawyers, C. L. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 489.
4. Courtney, K. D.; Corcoran, R. B.; Engelman, J. A. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 1075.
5. Liang, K.; Lu, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, X.; Glazer, R. I.; Mills, G. B.; Fan, Z. Mol. Pharmacol.
2006, 70(3), 1045.
6. Xie, Z.; Yuan, H.; Yin, Y.; Zeng, X.; Bai, R.; Glazer, R. I. BMC Cancer 2006, 6, 77.
7. Maurer, M.; Su, T.; Saal, L. H.; Koujak, S.; Hopkins, B. D.; Barkley, C. R.; Wu, J.;
Nandula, S.; Dutta, B.; Xie, Y.; Chin, Y. R.; Kim, D.-I.; Ferris, J. S.; Gruvberger-
Saal, S. K.; Laakso, M.; Wang, X.; Memeo, L.; Rojtman, A.; Matos, T.; Yu, J. S.;
Cordon-Cardo, C.; Isola, J.; Terry, M. B.; Toker, A.; Mills, G. B.; Zhao, J. J.; Murty,
V. V. V. S.; Hibshoosh, H.; Parsons, R. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6299.
8. Lawlor, M. A.; Mora, A.; Ashby, P. R.; Williams, M. R.; Murray-Tait, V.; Malone,
L.; Prescott, A. R.; Lucocq, J. M.; Alessi, D. R. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 372.
9. Lim, M. A.; Yang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, H.; Dong, L. Q.; Liu, F. Oncogene 2004, 23,
9348.
In conclusion we have designed and synthesized a series of 2-
anilino-4-aryl-8H-purine derivatives with potent PDK1 in vitro
Table 3
Cellular, microsomal and physicochemical profile of preferred compounds
Compound PC3 IC50
(
lM) DU145 IC50
(
lM) MDA-MB468 IC50
(l
M) MLM t1/2 (min) HLM t1/2 (min) PAPP (ꢀ10ꢁ6 cm/s) TPSA (Å2) H-bond donor count
6
13
18
0.58
44
1.07
0.83
N.T.
N.T.
1.3
N.T.
N.T.
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
N.T.
2.07
0
0
104
128
121
3
5
4