.
Angewandte
Communications
azobenzenes for perturbing intermolecular hydrogen-bond
interactions was anticipated to offer an effective method for
regulating aggregation properties (Scheme 1b).
The design of bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)diamides bearing the
azobenzene unit is depicted in Scheme 2. Initially, preserving
the isopropyl group derived from valine as well as the
preferred hydrogen-bond donor/acceptor arrangement
Figure 1. a) Impact of the amino acid residue on heterochiral precip-
itation. b) High fidelity in the formation of insoluble heterochiral
aggregates from the ensemble of three diamides bearing different
amino acid residues.
Scheme 2. Design of bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)diamides 2 and 3 bearing an
azobenzene unit.
suitable for perturbing the intermolecular interaction by
trans–cis photoisomerization and induce reversible hetero-
chiral precipitation and dissolution.
(shown in red), we attached the azobenzene unit (shown in
blue) of diamide 2 to the salicylic acid moiety (Scheme 2a).
We anticipated that the trans and cis configurations of
azobenzene, which are interconverted by UV and Vis
irradiation, would have an impact on the aggregation
capability, thus allowing us to control aggregation and
dissociation by external light irradiation. Unexpectedly, 2
afforded few insoluble heterochiral aggregates and photo-
isomerism of 2 was not efficient.[14,15] This finding led us to
focus on the amino acid residue in the diamide framework, to
which the azobenzene unit is installed. As a preliminary study,
“cross” heterochiral aggregation was examined, where heter-
ochiral diamides bearing different amino acid residues were
mixed to test the precipitation capability. Whereas the
mixture of [(S)-1a + (R)-1a] derived from valine or the
mixture of [(S)-1b + (R)-1b] derived from phenylalanine
underwent heterochiral precipitation in CHCl3,[16] the “cross”
mixture of [(S)-1a + (R)-1b] did not produce insoluble
heterochiral aggregate, and the resulting mixture remained
homogeneous even after 24 h (Figure 1a). For the ensemble
of three molecules of [(S)-1a + (R)-1a + (R)-1b], no forma-
tion of a heterochiral aggregate with a “cross” pair was
observed, but the insoluble heterochiral aggregate of [(S)-
1a + (R)-1a] was formed exclusively, and (R)-1b was not
recognized and remained in the solution phase (Figure 1b).
These results indicated that the amino acid residue had
a significant impact on the aggregation to form precipitates,
and the uniformity of the residue is essential to the
precipitation.[17] Therefore, we anticipated that the installa-
tion of the azobenzene unit at the residue part would be
Based on the above assumption, we next designed
diamides 3 bearing a pendant azobenzene unit at the residue
part (Scheme 2b).[18] Although the solubility of diamide (S)-
3a was too low in most of the common organic solvents to
conduct further studies, (S)-3b and (S)-3c exhibited suitable
solubility to allow for the preparation of a homochiral
solution in CHCl3 or CH3CN. (S)-3b was easy to handle and
the heterochiral aggregation of 3b was examined next. When
0.05m solutions of trans-(S)-3b and trans-(R)-3b in CH3CN
were mixed, an insoluble heterochiral aggregate was pro-
duced immediately; approximately 70% of 3b was precipi-
tated within three minutes (Figure 2a).[19] Aggregation
reached completion after approximately three hours, and
87% of 3b was precipitated.[20] Subsequently, the resulting
suspension was irradiated with UV light at 365 nm for six
hours with stirring to isomerize the pendant trans- to the cis-
azobenzene unit. The isomerization resulted in the gradual
disappearance of precipitates to increase the concentration of
3b in the solution phase (Figure 2b). Eventually, a clear
homogeneous solution of 3b developed, and over 95% of 3b
went back into solution, probably because the bent cis
configuration of the azobenzene moiety disturbed the effi-
ciency of the intermolecular hydrogen-bond interactions
between the preferred framework of (S)-3b and (R)-3b.[21,22]
To dissect the origin of the heterochiral precipitation, we
performed an X-ray crystallographic analysis of a single
crystal obtained from the heterochiral aggregate of 3b
(Figure 3).[23] Similar to the heterochiral aggregate of
1a,[12,24] we observed a zig-zag tight packing of (S)-3b and
2138
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2137 –2141