Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
[bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide]gold(I)
(IPrAuNTf2)
achieved in all cases, resulting in a highly selective strategy
for most of the substrates under these conditions, 14 out of 22
(E)-allylic alcohols 4a-f,j,k,m,n,p-s being obtained with over
85% conversion (Table 2).
and (2-di-tert-butylphosphinobiphenyl)gold(I) [bis(trifluoro-
methanesulfonyl)imide] (JohnPhosAuNTf2).[49] The reactions
were carried out in a water:2-propanol (4:1 v/v) mixture,
which would increase the solubility of the substrate and the
gold catalyst in the reaction medium, and at the same would
facilitate the use of an ADH in a concurrent manner, since 2-
propanol is commonly used as hydrogen donor for ADH-
catalyzed bioreduction processes.[57] Satisfyingly, complete
conversions were attained in both cases after 3 h, finding
a higher selectivity for the IPrAuNTf2 catalyst (85:15, E vs. Z).
At this point, different temperatures were studied leading at
458C to the best selectivity towards (E)-allylic alcohol 4a
(94:6, entry 6). Higher temperatures were not tested due to
the potential enzyme deactivation using harsher conditions.
Bearing in mind this fact, 408C was selected as upper limiting
conditions, and the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement reaction
was next studied with the previously synthesized propargylic
alcohols 3aÀx.
In general, good results were found with 2-arylpent-3-yn-
2-ols 3a-o, only attaining poor selectivities for substrates
bearing electron-donating substitutions at the para position
(methyl and methoxy, entries 8 and 9), or electron-donating
and electron-withdrawing groups at the ortho-position (en-
tries 7 and 15), highlighting the preference change when the
nitro functionality at the ortho-position was subjected to
investigation (10:90 E vs. Z, entry 12). Trying to expand the
possibilities of our methodology, 2-hetarylpent-3-yn-2-ols
were considered, for instance containing a thienyl moiety at
C-2 or C-3 (3p and 3q), and good selectivities were found
(entries 16 and 17), being especially noticeable the exclusive
formation of (E)-4-(thiophen-2-yl)pent-3-en-2-one (4p).
Next, the reaction was performed with the propargylic alcohol
bearing a furyl group substituted at C-2 position, but
a complex mixture was found. This is in accordance with the
already described reactivity of furan derivatives in combina-
tion with gold catalysis, occurring e.g., furan-alkyne intra-
molecular cyclizations or other rearrangements.[58] At this
point, the use of pyridine derivatives was omitted since it is
well known that the basic nitrogen atom coordinates to the
gold catalyst leading to a dramatic loss of the metal activity,[59]
requiring therefore higher reaction temperatures[60] that on
the other hand would not be compatible with a second
enzymatic reaction.
For the substrate scope, three molecular engineering
vectors were selected (R1, R2 and R3, Scheme of Table 2)
including 2-(het)arylpent-3-yn-2-ols (3a-q), hexynols 3r,t,v
and butynols 3s,u,w,x bearing different pattern substitutions
for a total of 24 substrates. Complete conversions were
Table 2: Meyer–Schuster rearrangement of (racemic) propargylic alco-
hols 3aÀx.
This strategy was also applicable when developing the
rearrangement over the aliphatic derivative 3r (R1 = tBu)
with very high preference towards the recovery of (E)-4,5,5-
trimethylhex-3-en-2-one (96:4 E/Z, entry 18). Next, the
influence of the substitution at the carbon bearing the
hydroxyl functionality was studied, in comparison with our
model substrate (R2 = CH3, 3a, entry 1), and 3 different
substitutions (R2 = H, Et, or Ph, 3s-u) were also considered,
obtaining ketones 4s-u with complete conversion, although
a significant decrease of the E/Z selectivity was observed
when moving from the formation of the less bulky substrate
(E)-4s (R2 = H, > 97%, entry 19) to the ones bearing
aliphatic moieties 4a (R2 = Me, 87%) and 4t (R2 = Et,
54%) of the E-isomer (entries 1 and 20). Obviously, for 4,4-
diphenylbut-3-en-2-one (4u, entry 21), E/Z isomerism was
not applicable.
The replacement of the methyl substitution at the
terminal alkyne position by an ethyl or a phenyl group
(R3 = Et or Ph, entries 22 and 23) was also considered,
achieving also a complete transformation into ketones 4v and
4w, but observing a decrease or even an inversion of the E/Z
selectivity when enlarging the size of the terminal substitu-
tion, favoring the formation of the (Z)-ketones (43 and 71%,
entries 22 and 23), in contrast to the preferred formation of
(E)-4a (entry 1, only 13% of the Z isomer). Finally,
maintaining the terminal aromatic ring but replacing the
phenyl ring by a methyl group at the R1 substitution, 3-
methyl-1-phenylbut-2-en-1-one (4x, entry 24) was also ob-
tained in full conversion. Overall, a very general methodology
was developed for the straightforward synthesis of allylic
Entry 3a–x R1
R2
R3
Yield [%][a]
(E)À4a–x (Z)À4a–x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
Ph
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
87
90
86
85
91
90
59
55
43
96
94
10
92
89
58
>97
86
96
13
10
14
15
9
10
41
45
57
4
6
90
8
11
42
<3
14
4
4-F-C6H4
4-Cl-C6H4
4-Br-C6H4
3-F-C6H4
2-F-C6H4
2-Br-C6H4
4-CH3-C6H4
4-OCH3-C6H4 CH3
4-NO2-C6H4 CH3
3-NO2-C6H4 CH3
2-NO2-C6H4 CH3
4-CF3-C6H4
3-CF3-C6H4
2-OCH3-C6H4 CH3
2-thienyl
3-thienyl
tBu
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
H
CH3CH2 CH3
Ph
CH3
CH3
CH3
s
t
u
v
w
x
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
CH3
>97
54
<3
46
CH3
CH3CH2
Ph
>97[b]
43
57
29
71
Ph
>97[b]
[a] Percentage of products measured by 1H NMR analyses of the crude
reaction mixture. See the Supporting Information for detailed reaction
conditions. Complete conversions to ketones 4a–x were attained in all
cases. [b] Not applicable the E–Z isomerism.
&&&&
ꢀ 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2 – 9
These are not the final page numbers!