simplicity, nondestructive character, high sensitivity, and
instantaneous response.3 Consequently, noninvasive fluor-
escence technique is a mode of choice for metal ion
imagining.4
model polymerM (where only a single nitrogen atom in the
imidazole ring is available for binding) was synthesized.
Synthesis of model polymer M is depicted in Supplemen-
tary Scheme S1.
The furthermost advantage of fluorescence “turn-on”
sensors related to “turn-off” sensors is the ease of detecting
low-concentration contrast relative to a “dark” back-
ground, which reduces the possibility of false positive
signals and enhances the sensitivity, as demonstrated by
numerous studies.5 The intramolecular charge transfer
(ICT)-based fluorescence mechanism has been widely used
to illustrate fluorescence turn-on and turn-off behaviors
for various sensory materials.6 Furthermore, ratiometric
fluorescent probes have immense significance because they
permit signal ratio corresponding to more than one wave-
length and provide built-in correction for environmental
effects.7 The naked eye perceived color change would be
beneficial for instantaneous visual sensing.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Polymer P
Numerous probes have been reported for sensing of
Hg2þ, for example, bis(N-methylindolyl)methane,8a amino-
acid,8b,c indole,8d sulfonamide,8e triazole-based dansyl,8f
methionine,8g and rhodamine.8h Likewise several probes
have been designed for Zn2þ sensing, such as dipicoly-
lamine,9a,b DPA,9c TPEN,9d and Schiff base derivatives.9e
Since the sulfur atom is considered to be a ‘‘soft’’ donor atom,
it can act as a chelating agent and also increase the sensor’s
affinity and selectivity for binding transition metal cations.
Herein, we synthesized thieno-imidazole based polymer
P (Scheme 1), with neighboring nitrogen and sulfur het-
eroatoms as chelating sites for metal ions. This was found
to be a suitable design for colorimetric detection of Hg2þ
and fluorometric detection of Zn2þ. 3,30-Bithiopene was
prepared from 3-bromothiophene by treating with n-BuLi
and CuCl2, which was further acylated without any Lewis
acid to produce compound 3. Then, it was coupled with
4-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)benzaldehyde by refluxing in the pre-
sence of acetic acid and NH4OAc to obtain compound 4.
N-Alkylation of 4 by hexyliodide and K2CO3 yielded
compound 5, which was brominated by NBS to obtain
monomer 6. Finally, Grignard polymerization of mono-
mer 6 by CH3MgBr and NiDPPCl2 produced polymer P.
To compare the selectivity of polymerP toward metal ions,
To verify the sensing abilities of metal ions, polymer P
was titrated over a wide range of metal ions, such as Naþ,
Kþ, Ba2þ, Ca2þ, Ni2þ, Cuþ, Co2þ, Agþ, Zn2þ, and Hg2þ
(Supplementary Figure S1). Originally, two absorption
maxima at 248 and 303 nm appeared in polymer P. Upon
the sequential addition of Hg2þ, a significant change in
absorption pattern was observed. As shown in Figure 1a,
the final intensities of the peak at 248 nm increased ca. 4.9-
fold, and the peak at 303 nm decreased ca. 50%. Further-
more, a new peakappearedat395 nm and increasedalmost
9.7-fold. Two clear isosbestic points at 281 and 367 nm
were obtained upon titration with Hg2þ. The intensities at
305 and 248 nm (Figure 1b) as well as 395 and 305 nm
(Figure 1c) were compared, which showed the intensity
changed almost linearly with the concentration of Hg2þ
.
The color of the polymer solution changed from colorless
to yellow, which could be easily detected by the naked eye.
However, other metal ions did not show such alteration in
absorption pattern. A Job plot was plotted to find the
stoichiometry during the binding of Hg2þ (Supplementary
Figure S2). The variation of absorption intensities at
385 and 305 nm (A385 ꢀ A305) as a function of molar ratio
XM = [Hg2þ]/{[Hg2þ] þ [P]} showed 1:1 stoichiometry.
1H NMR titration was further conducted to elucidate the
binding mode, and the NMR titration spectra of monomer
6 (in d-THF) upon the addition of 0ꢀ1.1 equiv of Hg2þ (in
D2O) are depicted in Figure 2. Notable downfield shifts of
peaks corresponding to the aromatic protons of monomer
(5) (a) Rurack, K.; Kollmannsberger, M.; Resch-Genger, U.; Daub,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 968. (b) McQuade, D. T.; Hegedus,
A. H.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12389.
(6) (a) Kim, J. S.; Quang, D. T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3780. (b) Zhang,
J. F.; Lim, C. S.; Bhuniya, S.; Cho, B. R.; Kim, J. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1190.
(7) Yuan, L.; Lin, W.; Chen, B.; Xie., Y. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 432.
(8) (a) Kaur, P.; Kaur, S.; Singh, K Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10,
1497. (b) Yang, M. H.; Thirupathi, P.; Lee, K. H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
5028. (c) Lohani, C. R.; Kim, J. M.; Lee, K. H. Tetrahedron 2011, 67,
4130. (d) Kaur, P.; Kaur, S.; Singh, K.; Sharma, P. R.; Kaur, T. Dalton
Trans. 2011, 40, 10818. (e) Joshi, B. P.; Lohani, C. R.; Lee, K. H. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3220. (f) Neupane, L. N.; Kim, J. M.; Lohani,
C. R.; Lee., K. H. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 4003. (g) Yang, M. H.;
Lohani, C. R.; Cho, H.; Lee, K. H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 2350.
(h) Kumar, M.; Kumar, N.; Bhalla, V.; Singh, H.; Sharma, P. R.; Kaur.,
T. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1422.
(9) (a) Zhang, J. F.; Kim, S.; Han, J. H.; Lee, S. J.; Pradhan, T.; Cao,
Q. Y.; Lee, S. J.; Kang, C.; Kim, J. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5294. (b) Xu, Y.;
Pang., Y. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 1503. (c) Xu, Y.; Pang., Y. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 4070. (d) Hanaoka, K.; Muramatsu, Y.; Urano, Y.;
Terai, T.; Nagano., T. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 568. (e) Wang, L.; Qin, W.;
Tang, X; Dou, W.; Liu., W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1609.
6 were observed upon the gradual addition of Hg2þ
.
1
However, no further changes in H NMR signals were
observed at higher equivalents of Hg2þ. This result is
consistent with 1:1 binding stoichiometry of Hg2þ with
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 10, 2012
2565