R. Rajesh, R. Venkatesan / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 359 (2012) 88–96
95
3.3. Catalytic activity
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, we have demonstrated low cost alternative proce-
dure for systematic grafting of hyperbranched PAMAM dendrimer
on graphite surface using Michael addition of methacrylate and
ethylenediamine which can encapsulate and stabilize AgNPs. The
third generation graphite grafted PAMAM dendrimer encapsulated
AgNPs shows excellent catalytic activity towards the reduction of
4-nitrophenol under mild conditions. The versatility of our system
has been demonstrated through speed of the reaction and selec-
tive nitro reduction without dehalogenation in halonitroarene and
Schiff’s base ligands containing imine groups. Further investiga-
tion on the encapsulation of other noble metal nanoparticles into
our graphite grafted PAMAM dendrimer and their application in
photocatalysis and electrocatalysis are underway.
solution of 4-nitrophenol and 0.1 M NaBH4 and 5 mg catalyst
[13–16]. The reduction was monitored through the absorbance
recorded at 400 nm (Fig. 8) and the pseudo first order rate constant
was estimated to be 21.7 × 10−3 s−1 (Table 1), for AgNPs/GR-
G3.0PAMAM which is the highest achieved so far to the best of our
knowledge in catalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds.
is attributed to the hydrophobic environment created by the
dendrimer backbone which stabilizes the aryl nitro substrates
adjacent to the catalytic sites which in turn facilitates the reduction
of nitro groups [46]. The maximum catalytic activity obtained at
AgNPs/GR-G3.0PAMAM (Table 1) could be the consequence of more
number of encapsulated AgNPs catalysts in the highly expanded
network of third generation PAMAM than the others. The reduction
was found to occur only in the presence of our nanocatalyst and
no reduction occurred at pure graphite powder or third generation
dendrimer graphite in the absence of AgNPs which shows that
the catalytic reduction occurs at the surface of our nanocatalyst.
Furthermore, the catalyst could be regenerated successfully after
the reduction reaction and could be reused for at least 10 more
rate.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the University Grants Commission
(UGC), Govt. of India, New Delhi, for funding the research project (F.
No. 39-782/2010 (SR). The authors also acknowledge the services
rendered by Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF), Pondicherry
University.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
3.3.2. Influence of catalytic dosage
amount of AgNPs/GR-G3.0PAMAM catalyst. As expected with an
increasing amount of catalyst, the rate of the reduction of 4-
nitrophenol increases. The individual kinetic reactions for each
dosage are shown in Figs. S1–S5 (see electronic supplemen-
tary material).
[1] W. Kleist, S.S. Prockl, M. Dreesa, K. Kohlera, L. Djakovitchb, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 303 (2009) 15.
[2] K. Stella, F.C. Lynch, M. Xiaomei, L. Won Jin, A. Jane, H.H. Carol, C.A. Gabriella,
F. Laura Beane, A. Jennifer, R.L. Hou, P.D. Sandler, C.R.M. Alavanja, Int. J. Cancer
124 (2009) 1206.
[3] O. Adriana de, P.E. Kagohara, H. Leandro, A.V. Joao, C.H.S. Iracema, R. Crusius,
C.R. Claudete, Paula, L.M. Andre Porto, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 42 (2007) 65.
[4] S. Farhadi, F. Siadatnasab, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 339 (2011) 108.
[5] I. Pogorelic, M. Filipan-Litvic, S. Merkas, G. Ljubic, I. Cepanec, M. Litvic, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 274 (2007) 202.
3.3.3. Eco-friendly procedure for selective reduction of nitro
groups of various halo and imine containing nitro aromatics
In a typical reduction, 50 mg of AgNPs/GR-G3.0PAMAM cata-
lyst was added to 50 mL of aqueous solution containing 1 mmol of
halonitro compound and 10 mmol of NaBH4. The mixture was vig-
orously stirred at room temperature. The reaction was monitored
through TLC and reaction mixture was quenched by extracting
point, IR, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. The conversion yield was moni-
tored through GC [8,47].
The efficiency of AgNPs/GR-G3.0PAMAM catalyst in reducing dif-
ferent nitro derivatives is presented in Table 2. The striking feature
of our catalyst is the quantitative reduction of halo-substituted
nitro benzenes without any dehalogenations (Table 2, entries
8–11). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report show-
ing halonitro-derivative reduction at mild conditions without any
dehalogenations. All mononitro derivatives resulted in 100% amine
formation. However, dinitro derivative result in about 60–65% con-
version. The remaining 35–40% have yielded monoamine derivative
which can be further reduced to diamine derivatives through a sep-
arate reduction step. Another interesting feature is the selective
reduction of nitro groups in the presence of imine groups (Table 2,
entry 12). No imine reduction occurs under these mild experimen-
tal conditions. However, when the reaction solution was brought
to reflux, imine reduction occurred.
[6] M.L. Crossley, Ind. Eng. Chem. 14 (1922) 802.
[7] Y. Mei, G. Sharma, Y. Lu, M. Ballauff, Langmuir 21 (2005) 12229.
[8] M. David, D.S. Bhattacharjee, Y. Wen, L.M. Bruening, Langmuir 25 (2009) 1865.
[9] K. Kuroda, T. Ishida, M. Haruta, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 298 (2009) 7.
[10] D. Astruc, F. Lu, J. Ruiz Aranzaes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 7852.
[11] I. Nakamula, Y. Yamanoi, T. Yonezawa, T. Imaoka, K. Yamamoto, H. Nishihara,
Chem. Commun. (2008) 5716.
[12] I. Nakamula, Y. Yamanoi, T. Imaoka, K. Yamamoto, H. Nishihara, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 5830.
[13] H. Yang, K. Nagai, T. Abe, H. Homma, T. Norimatsu, R. Ramaraj, Appl. Mater.
Interface 1 (2009) 1860.
[14] K. Hayakawa, T. Yoshimura, K. Esumi, Langmuir 19 (2003) 5517.
[15] S. Panigrahi, S. Basu, S. Praharaj, S. Pande, S. Jana, A. Pal, S.K. Ghosh, J. Phys.
Chem. C 111 (2007) 4596.
[16] Y. Lu, Y. Mei, R. Walker, M. Ballauff, M. Drechsler, Polymer (2006) 4985.
[17] A. Saha, B. Ranu, J. Org. Chem. 73 (2008) 6867.
[18] B. Sreedhar, P. Surendra Reddy, D. Keerthi Devi, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 8806.
[19] Y. Chen, C. Wang, H. Liu, J. Qiu, X. Bao, Chem. Commun. (2005) 5298.
[20] R. Raja, B. Vladimir, G.M. John, T.A.B. Murcia, Chem. Commun. (2005) 2026.
[21] Y. Chen, J. Qiu, X. Wang, J. Xiu, J. Catal. 242 (2006) 227.
[22] Y. Jiang, Q. Gao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 716.
[23] J. Peterson, A. Ebber, V. Allikmaa, M. Lopp, Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Chem. 50
(3) (2001) 156.
[25] B. Pan, D. Cui, F. Gao, R. He, Nanotechnology 17 (2006) 2483.
[26] C. Zhang, P. Su, M.U. Farooq, Y. Yang, X. Gao, E. Hongjun, React. Funct. Polym.
70 (2010) 129.
[27] G. Rajesh Krishnan, K. Sreekumar, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2008) 4763.
[28] L. Tao, G. Chen, G. Mantovani, S. York, D.M. Haddleton, Chem. Commun. (2006)
4949.
[29] W. Yuan, G. Jiang, J. Che, X. Qi, R. Xu, W.M. Chang, Y. Chen, S. Yin Lim, J. Dai, B.
Mary, C. Park, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 18754.
[30] X. Lu, T. Imae, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 2416.
[31] S. Zhen Zu, B. Hang Han, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 13651.