Inorganic Chemistry
Article
La(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.108 g (60%). Formula:
The applied magnetic field intensity was 1.5 T. To optimize the
alignment of molecules, the cooling rates did not exceed 1 °C/min.
Molar susceptibilities were corrected by applying the Pascal scheme to
consider internal diamagnetism.26 The equation μeff/μB = 2.828-
(χT)1/2 was used to calculate magnetic moments.
The degree of alignment of lanthanidomesogens was analyzed by
the capacitance method.94,95 Under applied external fields, the degree
of alignment correlates with the electric capacity of the experimental
cell. The changing capacity of liquid crystal cells under applied
magnetic fields of various strengths makes it possible to characterize
the effect of a magnetic field on the degree of alignment in a sample.
The samples were aligned macroscopically by a magnetic field of 5000
Oe.
The measurement cell was a flat titanium capacitor with 12 pF
capacity and d = 200 μm distance between electrodes. Capacities were
found with a HIOKI-3532 RLC-meter.84 Dielectric permittivity
components in the 100 Hz to 5 MHz electric field frequency range
were determined from the reference set of dielectric permittivity
values corresponding to the computer-set frequencies.
The threshold voltage was found from the response of the dielectric
permittivity of a cell filled with a lanthanide complex to the electric
field strength. Dielectric permittivities at various angles φ between
electric and magnetic fields were found by rotating the cell in relation
to the magnets at the temperature of the nematic mesophase
existence. The rotation frequency of 104 Hz provided quasistatic
values of dielectric permittivity components.
C113H175N2O6La. Anal. Found: C, 75.18; H, 9.97; N, 1.52; La, 7.45.
1
Calcd: C, 75.55; H, 9.82; N, 1.56; La, 7.73. H NMR (CDCl3, 400
MHz): δ −0.80 to 1.07 (m, 24H, CH3); 1.13−1.92 (m, 117H, CH2,
C6H10); 2.00−2.45 (m, 6H, RCH2CO); 2.48−2.65 (m, 3H, C6H10);
2.61−2.67 (m, 4H, CH2Pyr); 5.72−5.83(m, 1H, CHCO); 6.12 (s,
2H, CHCO); 7.23−7.37 (m, 6H, C6H4); 7.56−7.59 (m, 2H, Pyr H4);
7.79−7.84 (m, 6H, C6H4), 8.43−8.52 (m, 2H, Pyr H3); 8.23−8.26
(m, 2H, Pyr H6). ESI-MS (m/z): 1795.2 (M+). IR (ν, cm−1): 208,
412, 467 (La−N), 175, 208, 308, 403 (La−O).
Sm(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.110 g (61%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Sm. Anal. Found: C, 74.57; H, 9.97; N, 1.54; Sm,
8.16. Calcd: C, 75.07; H, 9.76; N, 1.55; Sm, 8.32. ESI-MS (m/z):
1831.1 (M + Na)+.
Gd(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.118 g (65%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Gd. Anal. Found: C, 74.37; H, 10.01; N, 1.52; Gd,
8.48. Calcd: C, 74.78; H, 9.72; N, 1.54; Gd, 8.66. ESI-MS (m/z):
1814.3 (M+).
Tb(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.122 g (67%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Tb. Anal. Found: C, 74.20; H, 10.03; N, 1.53; Tb,
8.81. Calcd: C, 74.71; H, 9.71; Tb, 8.75; N, 1.54. ESI-MS (m/z):
1838.3 (M + Na)+.
Dy(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.118 g (65%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Dy. Anal. Found: C, 74.11; H, 9.98; N, 1.53; Dy,
8.56. Calcd: C, 74.57; H, 9.69; N, 1.54; Dy, 8.93. ESI-MS (m/z):
1843.2 (M + Na)+.
Dielectric permittivity components at various electric field
frequencies or magnetic field strengths were found at the following
angles: φ = 10° for the Eu(III) complex; φ = 0° (εpar = ε∥) and then φ
= 90° in relation to the initial position (εnor = ε⊥) for the Gd(III),
Sm(III), and Er(III) complexes; φ = 0° (εpar = ε⊥) and then φ = 90°
(εnor = ε) for the Tb(III) and Dy(III) complexes.
Dielectric permittivities at various magnetic field strengths were
found by varying the electric current in magnet coils at the
temperature of the nematic mesophase existence.
Ho(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield 0.113 g (62%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Ho. Anal. Found: C, 74.29; H, 9.73; N, 1.52; Ho,
9.32. Calcd: C, 74.47; H, 9.68; N, 1.54; Ho, 9.05. ESI-MS (m/z):
1822.6 (M+).
Er(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield: 0.118 g (65%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Er. Anal. Found: C, 74.25; H, 9.76; N, 1.52; Er, 9.35.
Calcd: C, 74.37; H, 9.67; N, 1.54; Er, 9.17. ESI-MS (m/z): 1847.8 (M
+ Na)+.
Tm(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield 0.113 g (62%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Tm. Anal. Found: C, 74.19; H, 9.73; N, 1.53; Tm,
9.38. Calcd: C, 74.30; H, 9.66; N, 1.53; Tm, 9.25. ESI-MS (m/z):
1849.6 (M + Na)+.
The frequency data were approximated by the Cole−Cole equation
(1); the reach-through conductivity of the samples was taken into
Yb(CPDK3‑5)3bpy17‑17. Yield 0.123 g (67%). Formula:
C113H175N2O6Yb. Anal. Found: C, 74.02; H, 9.71; N, 1.52; Yb,
9.48. Calcd: C, 74.14; H, 9.64; N, 1.53; Yb, 9.45. ESI-MS (m/z):
1853,4 (M + Na)+.
ε0 − ε∞
B
ε* = ε∞
+
+ i
1 + (i2πfτ)1−α
f N
(1)
where ε0 is the quasistatic dielectric permittivity value, ε∞ is the high-
frequency dielectric permittivity value, τ is the average dielectric
relaxation time; α is the parameter that characterizes the relaxation
time distribution, and B and N ≤ 1 are the numerical coefficients.
For complexes with a negative anisotropy of magnetic suscepti-
bility, the longitudinal component of dielectric permittivity was
estimated using the Maier−Meier theory for dielectric polarization of
liquid crystals.96 According to this theory, the average dielectric
permittivity (2)
1H NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker Avance 400
spectrometers. The mass spectra were obtained using a Bruker
Esquire LC-Ion Trap mass spectrometer. CHN elemental micro-
analysis was performed on a Delta V Plus isotope mass spectrometer
(Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lanthanide elemental microanalysis was
performed on a Bruker S8 TIGER X-ray fluorescence instrument. FT-
IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS-66v/s IR Fourier
spectrometer. Luminescence spectra were measured with a Varian
Cary Eclipse spectrofluorimeter.
The liquid-crystal properties of the complexes were examined on an
Olympus BX51 polarizing optical microscope with a Linkam precision
temperature control system. Thermodynamic parameters of phase
transitions were characterized on a Mettler Toledo Star System DSC
1 differential scanning calorimeter. The scan rate was 10 K/min.
The presence of a large number of long alkyl substituents in the
structure of the studied anisometric Eu(III) complexes does not allow
one to prepare a single crystal for X-ray diffraction analyses and obtain
a crystal structure. Therefore, quantum-chemical simulation is the
only technique for the study of the structure and certain properties of
anisometric Eu(III) compounds.
Quantum-chemical calculations of the equilibrium geometry of
Eu(III) complexes in the ground state were performed in the gas
phase using the Priroda 06 software by the DFT method with the PBE
exchange correlation functional as described in ref 36.
The temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibilities was
analyzed on a Faraday magnetometer with a custom heating system.92
The measurements were performed using a Cahn RG computer
microbalance and a Bruker B-MN 200/40 power supply system.93
ε = (ε∥ + 2ε )/3
(2)
̅
⊥
is equal to εis or differs insignificantly from it (by several percent) at
the temperature of the transition from the isotropic phase to the
mesomorphous phase. Extrapolation of the temperature curve εis to
the mesophase range makes it possible to characterize the
temperature behavior of ε and calculate the values of ε∥ at various
temperatures (Figure 9a).
̅
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
■
sı
Thermodynamic characteristics of phase transitions,
magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, dielectric permittivity
of the Ln(III) complexes, and the optimized structures
of Eu(III) complex isomers (PDF)
667
Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 660−670