the preparation of a variety of difluorophosphonates, they
are limited by some combination of expensive reagents, the
incompatibility of functional groups, and restricted syn-
thetic applications. The current synthetic methods have
been applied mainly for the preparation of alkyldifluor-
ophosphonates and aryldifluorophosphonates. A method
for the construction of functionalized difluorophospho-
nate derivatives such as R,R-difluoropropargylphospho-
nates has not been well developed.
into organic molecules. Recently, the copper-mediated
oxidative trifluoromethylation developed by our group
has facilitated the direct and efficient synthesis of a wide
range of trifluoromethylated compounds.11 Specifically,
this protocol allows the direct installation of a trifluoro-
methyl group in place of CÀH bonds without the need for
prefunctionalized substrates.11a,c,e Encouraged by these
results, we anticipated that a similar copper-mediated
CÀH oxidation protocol might allow for the preparation
of difluorophosphonate analogues. Herein, we describe
the first example of a copper-mediated oxidative cross-
coupling reaction of teminal alkynes with R-silyldifluor-
omethylphosphonates (Scheme 1c). This reaction provides
a novel and direct methodology for the preparation of R,R-
difluoropropargylphosphonates bearing a wide range of
functional groups by employing readily available R-
silyldifluoromethylphosphonates.
To test our hypothesis, the initial investigation focused
on the reaction of phenylacetylene 1a with (EtO)2P(O)-
CF2SiMe312a 2a under the optmized conditions of copper-
mediated trifluoromethylation of terminal alkynes.11a
However, when the reaction was run using stoichiometric
amounts of CuI, 1,10-phenthroline, and KF under air
none of the desired product, 3a, was observed. Instead
dimer 4a and (EtO)2P(O)CF2H 5a were obtained (Table 1,
entry 1). Lowering the reaction temperature did not inhibit
the decomposition of (EtO)2P(O)CF2SiMe3 2a and the
formation of homocoupling product 4a (entry 1).
To achieve this transformation, we evaluated a series of
oxidantsand foundthata significant amountof the desired
product 3a was observed when the reaction was carried out
with PhI(OAc)2 (entries 2À5). Since the base is known to
have a profound effect on transmetalations and cross-
coupling reactions, we investigated the influence of the
base. It was found that t-BuOK gave the highest yield of
product 3a (entries 6À10). Switching to other bases such as
K2CO3, K3PO4, or t-BuONa led to a dramatic decrease in
yield (entries 6À10). Various copper salts were found to
mediate this transformation, while CuI proved to be better
than other copper salts (entries 11À14). Considering
the effectiveness of PhI(OAc)2 as the oxidant, a series of
other hypervalent iodine reagents such as PhI(OPiv)2 and
R,R-Difluoropropargylphosphonates were originally
recognized as a new type of difluorophosphonate by
Hammond in 1996.6c These compounds would be highly
useful as versatile synthetic intermediates to various bio-
logically important difluorophosphonates through conver-
sion of the triple bond into other functional groups.6c,d,10d,e
Hammond first reported the preparation of R,R-difluor-
opropargylphosphonates via nucleophilic fluorination
of R-ketophosphonates, but this method required the use of
limitedly stable R-ketophosphonates and a large excess of
the fluorinating reagent (Scheme 1a).6c,d Later, Burton
and co-workers developed a copper-mediated cross-
coupling reaction of propargyl halides and (EtO)2P(O)-
CF2ZnBr, providing an alternative method for the
preparation of these compounds (Scheme 1b).10d,e A path-
way involving (EtO)2P(O)CF2Cu species generated in situ
was proposed for this copper-mediated cross-coupling
reaction. This method is useful and practical but requires
prefunctionalized alkynyl substrates and metalated
difluoromethylphosphonates. Therefore, the development
of direct and efficient methods for the preparation of R,
R-difluoropropargylphosphonates is still highly desirable.
Scheme 1. Preparation of R,R-Difluoropropargylphosphonates
(8) (a) Berkowitz, D. B.; Eggen, M.; Shen, Q.; Sloss, D. G. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 6174. (b) Vinod, T. K.; Hayes Griffith, O.; Keana,
J. F. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7193. (c) Berkowitz, D. B.; Sloss,
D. G. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7047. (d) Matulic-Adamic, J.; Haeberli, P.;
Usman, N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2563. (e) Berkowitz, D. B.; Bhuniya,
D.; Peris, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1869.
(9) (a) Berkowitz, D. B.; Eggen, M.; Shen, Q.; Shoemaker, R. K.
J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4666. (b) Piettre, S. R.; Girol, C.; Schelcher,
C. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4711. (c) Blades, K.; Lapotre, D.;
Percy, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5895. (d) Blades, K.; Percy, J. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9085.
Fluoroalkyl cross-coupling has been proven to be
an efficient strategy to introduce the fluoroalkyl moiety
^
(6) (a) Smyth, M. S.; Burke, T. R., Jr. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 551.
(b) Solas, D.; Hale, R. L.; Patel, D. V. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1537. (c)
Benayoud, F.; Hammond, G. B. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1447. (d) Wang,
Z.; Gu, Y.; Zapata, A. J.; Hammond, G. B. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 107,
127.
(10) (a) Weiming, Q.; Burton, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2745.
(b) Yokomatsu, T.; Suemune, K.; Murano, T.; Shibuya, S. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 7207. (c) Yokomatsu, T.; Murano, T.; Suemune, K.; Shibuya,
S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 815. (d) Zhang, X.; Burton, D. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 7791. (e) Zhang, X.; Burton, D. J. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002,
116, 15. (f) Feng, Z.; Chen, F.; Zhang, X. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1938.
(11) (a) Chu, L. L.; Qing, F. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7262. (b)
Chu, L. L.; Qing, F. L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5060. (c) Chu, L. L.; Qing,
F. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1298. (d) Jiang, X. L.; Chu, L. L.;
Qing, F. L. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1251. (e) Chu, L. L.; Qing, F. L. Org.
Lett. 2012, 14, 2106.
(7) (a) Yang, Z. Y.; Burton, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4676. (b) Li,
A.-R.; Chen, Q.-Y. Synthesis 1996, 606. (c) Lequeux, T.; Lebouc, F.;
Lopin, C.; Yang, H.; Gouhier, G.; Piettre, S. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 3, 185.
(d) Ozouf, P.; Binot, G.; Pommelet, J.-C.; Lequeux, T. P. Org. Lett. 2004,
ꢁ
6, 3747. (e) Sene, A.; Diab, S.; Hienzsch, A.; Cahard, D.; Lequeux, T.
Synlett 2009, 981.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 11, 2012
2871