5146 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 14, 1999
Motschiedler et al.
pump-thaw cycles or by bubbling Ar through the sample for
at least 20 min prior to irradiation with a 400 W medium-
pressure Ace-Hanovia Hg arc lamp. A 150 W PTI medium-
pressure Hg arc lamp with a monochromator was also used
for some experiments. Samples were immersed in a controlled
temperature bath. Direct irradiations at λ > 290 nm were
carried out with Pyrex filters, and for λ > 470 nm a cutoff filter
was used. A combination of a 360 nm cutoff and a 300-400
nm band-pass from Melles Griot was used for sensitized
irradiation when not using the PTI lamp. Samples were
irradiated until the characteristic pink color of the diazo
compound had completely disappeared, or when necessary,
they were quenched with a small amount of dimethylacetylene
dicarboxylate (DMAD) to remove unreacted diazo. The samples
were analyzed in duplicate by GLC, and the average values
are reported.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Syn th esis of Hyd r a zon es. All
hydrazones were prepared from the corresponding ketone,
which was either purchased or synthesized by methods
described below. In a typical reaction, the ketone is heated to
reflux in EtOH. A slight excess of hydrazine is added slowly,
and the reaction is allowed to reflux for 1-12 h. Reaction
progress is monitored by IR, TLC, and/or GC, and more
hydrazine may be added as needed until the reaction is
complete. The solution volume is reduced and then cooled to
induce crystallization of the hydrazone. The white crystals are
filtered and washed several times with cold EtOH, followed
by recrystallization from CHCl3/EtOH if needed.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Syn t h esis of Dia zo Com -
p ou n d s. Diazo compounds were prepared from the appropri-
ate hydrazone by HgO oxidation. In a typical reaction, 10-25
mg of the hydrazone is suspended in 25 mL of pentane, along
with 5 equiv of MgSO4 and a large excess of HgO. Several
drops of anhydrous concentrated KOH/EtOH are added, and
the reaction is allowed to stir in the dark at room temperature
for several hours. Reaction progress is monitored by IR and/
or GC. When the reaction is complete, the pale pink pentane
solution is filtered several times to remove all traces of
mercury, and solvent is removed to give dark pink fluid or
crystals. A quantitative yield is assumed. Samples are stored
in the dark at 0 °C.
Con clu sion s
Although some of the assumptions involved in the
triplet sensitization experiments and the methanol trap-
ping rates will have to be confirmed, interpretation of
the data in terms of an excited-state reaction (∼30%) and
competition between carbene 1,2-H(Ph) shifts and diffu-
sion-controlled trapping reactions seems to be very
robust. This interpretation is supported by the well
documented role of substituents at the migrating origin,
which have a very strong accelerating effect on the rates
of 1,2-H shifts and 1,2-Ph migrations. For instance,
whereas methylchlorocarbene has a 1,2-H-limited life-
time of 330 ns47 (or ∼700 ns48), the lifetimes of propyl-
chlorocarbene,48 benzylchlorocarbene49 and R-methylben-
zylchlorocarbene47 are reduced to 17, 18, and 2 ns,
respectively. The combined effect of a phenyl and a
methyl group at the migrating origin accelerate the 1,2-H
shift by a factor of ca. 150. Transition-state energies with
zero point energy corrections calculated at the B3LYP/
6-311**G//B3LYP/631G* level recently published11 ac-
count well for these rate differences and confirm the
importance of stabilizing a developing positive charge at
the migrating origin. The same conclusion was reached
experimentally from the effect of solvents on the rate of
the reaction.36 The rate of 1,2-H shift in phenylethylidene
is increased by more than a factor of 30, from k1,2-H < 6
× 106 s-1 in hydrocarbons to 2 × 108 s-1 in acetonitrile.
To conclude, although 1,2-H shifts in 1-phenylethylidene
are fairly slow, it is reasonable that rates of 1,2-H shifts
in 1,2-diphenylethylidenes in methanol should have rate
constants in the subnanosecond regime when the effect
of the phenyl group at position 2 (∼150-fold) and the
effect of solvent polarity (∼30-fold) are taken into ac-
count.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Syn th esis of Com p ou n d s 7, 8, 9a , a n d 10. The prepara-
tion of these compounds has been previously reported.25,32
Syn th esis of Com p ou n d 9b. Compound 9b was prepared
as shown in Scheme 3. The preparation and characterization
of all compounds is described below.
Gen er a l. UV spectra were obtained on a Varian Cary 2300
spectrophotometer and a Beckman DU 650 spectrophotometer.
GC data was obtained on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II
gas chromatograph, with an HP 3396 Series II integrator. An
HP-1 cross-linked methyl silicone gum column and an HP-
20M Carbowax 20M column were used. Both are 25 m × 0.20
mm, with a 0.20 µm film thickness. A Spex Fluorolog spec-
trofluorimeter with double grating monochromator was used
to obtain fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra. Front
surface illumination and detection was used. Phosphorescence
measurements used a pulsed lamp with a 10 µs pulse width.
A custom sample holder held a Dewar with a Pyrex cold finger
to keep the samples at 77 K during the analysis. The
nanosecond laser flash photolysis apparatus at The Ohio State
University has been described in detail in ref 18.
Ma ter ia ls. Dicyclohexylacetic acid (99%), deoxybenzoin
(97%), and isobutyrophenone (97%) were purchased from
Aldrich. Acetophenone, benzaldehyde, and toluene (Certified
A.C.S.) were purchased from Fisher. All commercial reagents
were of the highest grade available. Solvents were dried
according to accepted literature methods and were kept over
4 Å molecular sieves.
2,2-Dicycloh exyl-1-(4′-m eth yl)-p h en yleth a n on e. A mix-
ture of dicyclohexylacetic acid (2.5 g, 11.1 mmol), and 3.3 g
(2.0 mL, 27.8 mmol) of thionyl chloride was refluxed in 25 mL
methylene chloride for 1.5 h. The solvent and unreacted SOCl2
were removed by rotary evaporation. The resulting acid halide
was dissolved in 20 mL of toluene. A 2.5 g (18.7 mmol) portion
of AlCl3 was added slowly, and the reaction was stirred for 1
h. The reaction was quenched by pouring into several volumes
of water, and the aqueous layer was extracted twice with ether.
The combined organic layers were washed twice with water
and dried over MgSO4. Removal of the solvent gave a yellow
oil. Crystallization from pentane gave 2.4 g (72%) in two crops
of white crystals, mp 55-60 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ:
0.76-1.32 (m, 12H), 1.62-1.94 (m, 10H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 3.28 (t,
J ) 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.87 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz,
2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 90 MHz) δ: 21.53, 26.44, 26.51, 26.76,
29.81, 31.85, 37.83, 55.73, 128.26, 129.16, 137.73, 143.31,
205.08. FTIR (KBr pellet) cm-1: 1663. EI HRMS: calculated
for C21H30O 298.2297, found 298.2288.
2,2-D ic y c lo h e x y l-1-(4′-b r o m o m e t h y l)-p h e n y le t h a -
n on e (13).33 The Friedel-Crafts adduct (1.50 g, 5.03 mmol),
1.34 g (7.55 mmol) of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), and 0.12 g
(0.50 mmol) of benzoyl peroxide were dissolved in 15-25 mL
of CCl4. The solution was heated to vigorous reflux for up to
24 h, until the reaction showed no further progress by TLC
and GC. The reaction mixture was cooled and filtered to
remove solids, and then solvent was removed to give an oil
which was 80% pure by GC analysis. Flash chromatography
was used to purify the mixture, but some ketone starting
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for An a lytica l P h otolysis. Solutions
for photolysis were prepared by dissolving the diazo compound
in MeOH to make a 5 mM solution. For sensitized experiments,
benzophenone was added to make the solutions 25 mM in
sensitizer. Samples were deoxygenated by 5-10 freeze-
(47) Liu, M. T. H.; Bonneau, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8098-
8101.
(48) LaVilla, J . A.; Goodman, J . L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
6877-6878.
(49) Liu, M. T. H.; Bonneau, R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3915-
3919.