Scheme 3. Synthesis of Amino Alcohol Fragment 7
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Carboxylic Acid Fragment 8
following Negishi’s protocol,16 provided exclusively
E-vinyl iodide 15 in 78% yield in two steps. Treatment of 15
with 4 M HCl in dioxane furnished the desired amino
alcohol 7.17 Due to the high sensitivity of 7 for workup as
well as chromatography, the product was confirmed by 1H
NMR of the crude reaction mixture after removal of
reaction volatiles and was used as such for the next reaction.
On the other hand, carboxylic acid 8 was synthesized
(Scheme 4) in a stereocontrolled manner starting from
protected compound 17, which was prepared in four steps
from PMB protected aldehyde 16 following a literature
procedure.9b Oxidative removal of the PMB group in 17
using DDQ gave the primary alcohol 18 in 94% yield.
DessꢀMartin periodinane oxidation18 of the resultant
primary alcohol yielded the corresponding aldehyde,
which was then subjected to methoxy directed19 chelation
controlled prenyl stannylation using TiCl4 to obtain the
alcohol in 86% yield with a 9:1 ratio (determined by the 1H
NMR integration) of separable diastereomers in favor of
the desired anti isomer 20. Lower selectivities were ob-
the monodentate Lewis acid BF3 Et2O was identified to
3
promote the desired aldol addition in toluene to give the
required β-hydroxyl ester 23in 82% yield (three steps) with
3.4:1 diastereoselectivity in favor of the desired anti
isomer.22 Noteworthy is that the use of bidentate Lewis
acid TiCl4 provided the aldol product in a reversal of the
diastereoselectivity (1:1.7, dr).23 Since the resultant diaste-
reomers were not separable at this stage we continued
further as such for the silyl protection of hydroxyl group
followed by saponification of methyl ester to obtain the
acid 8 in 90% yield (anti/syn = 3.4:1).
With both amino alcohol 7 and carboxylic acid 8 in
hand, we endeavored to combine them through an oxazole
synthesis (Scheme 5). First, an amide coupling between
amino alcohol 7 and carboxylic acid 8 using EDCI,
HOBt, and NEt324 afforded a mixture of hydroxyl amide
(anti/syn = 3.2:1) in 76% yield. At this stage both C16
epimers were separated by column chromatography and
optically pure anti isomer 24 was isolated in 58% yield.
DessꢀMartin periodinane mediated oxidation of hydroxyl
amide 24 followed by one-pot cyclodehydration of the
resultant aldehyde and subsequent elimination of HBr
from the bromooxazoline intermediate following Wipf
conditions25 afforded the oxazole 25 in 74% yield. Selec-
tive primary silyl deprotection using acetic acid buffered
served with other Lewis acids such as MgBr2 Et2O, ZnBr2,
and BF3 Et2O. This transformation establishes the C17
3
3
geminal dimethyl and C18 stereocenter with a good level
of 1,3-anti stereoinduction. The C18 hydroxyl group was
protected as p-methoxybenzyl ether to obtain 21 using
PMBOC(dNH)CCl3 and La(OTf)3.20 Dihydroxylation
of olefin followed by oxidative cleavage of the resulting
diol provided the corresponding aldehyde in good yield.
To install the β-hydroxy ester, a Lewis acid mediated
Mukaiyama aldol reaction21 between the aldehyde and
commercially available silyl enol ether 22 was investigated.
After various Lewis acids and conditions were screened,
(16) Huang, Z.; Negishi, E.-I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3675.
(22) (a) The absolute configuration of the major C16 stereogenic
center was determined as (16S) by 1H NMR analysis of the correspond-
ing (R)- and (S)-MTPA esters. See: Supporting Information for details.
(b) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4092.
(17) Han, G.; Tamaki, M.; Hruby, V. J. J. Peptide Res. 2001, 58, 338.
(18) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155. (b)
Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277.
(19) (a) Keck, G. E.; Castellino, S.; Wiley, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51,
5478. (b) Keck, G. E.; Castellino, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3847. (c)
Keck, G. E.; Abbott, D. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1883. (d) For
methoxy directed allylation, see: Paterson, I.; Coster, M. J.; Chen, D. Y.-K.;
Gibson, K. R.; Wallace, D. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2410.
(20) Rai, A. N.; Basu, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2267.
(21) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Banno, K.; Narasaka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 7503. (b) Paterson, I.; Smith, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3261.
(c) Paterson, I.; Smith, J. D.; Ward, R. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 9413. (d)
Mutou, T.; Suenaga, K.; Fujita, T.; Itoh, T.; Takada, N.; Hayamizu, K.;
Kigoshi, H.; Yamada, K. Synlett 1997, 199. (e) Evans, D. A.; Dart, M. J.;
Duffy, J. L.; Yang, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4322. (f) Evans,
D. A.; Allison, B. D.; Yang, M. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4457.
(23) Other Lewis acids, i.e. TiCl2(O-iPr)2, MgBr2 Et2O, ZnBr2, and
3
LiClO4, were also investigated but were less effective. Under these condi-
tions either no reaction or decomposition of aldehyde was observed.
(24) Sheehan, J.; Cruickshank, P.; Boshart, G. J. Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 2525.
(25) (a) Wipf, P.; Miller, C. P. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3604. (b) Wipf,
P.; Lim, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 558.
(26) Higashibayashi, S.; Shinko, K.; Ishizu, T.; Hashimoto, K.;
Shirahama, H.; Nakata, M. Synlett 2000, 1306.
(27) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. V. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
5505.
2860
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 11, 2012