2220
Z. Cao et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 57 (2016) 2219–2221
OH
OH
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
HO
O
O
N
1
N
2
N
5
N
3
N
4
N
6
N
Pyrrolezanthine(7)
Figure 1. Reported structures of alkaloids 1–7.
Table 1
OH
O
R
N
O
OH
-4H2O
Optimization in the condensation of D-fructose and D-alanine
OH
R
NH2
HO
+
Entry Mole
ratioa
Solvent
T
(°C)
t
(h)
Yieldb
(%)
OH OH
D-fructose
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
Acetic acid
Acetic acid
Acetic acid
Acetic acid
80
50
50
80
80
80
80
8
8
18
8
8
8
2
Figure 2. Proposed biosynthesis of alkaloids with 5-hydroxymethyl-pyrrole-2-
carbaldehyde unit.
1.2
1.3
2.1
0
2.2
3.8
EtOH, 1.5 equiv acetic acid
Acetic acid + pyridine (2:1)
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(2:1)
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(2:1)
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(2:1)
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(2:1)
reported in DMSO and oxalic acid.17 This kind of conversion
occurred in acid environment. As Paal–Knorr pyrrole synthesis
was conducted in acetic acid, we tried the dehydration in acetic
8
8
1:2
1:3
1:5
1:5
1:6
80
80
80
80
80
8
8
8
8
8
8.2
acid from -fructose and alanine at 80 °C as Scheme 1. Although
D
alkaloids 1 was obtained, the yield was only 2% calculated with ala-
nine (entry 1 in Table 1). The side product 5-hydroxymethylfur-
fural (5-HMF) and large amount of formed caramel became a
barrier of desired alkaloids.
The changes of reaction conditions with lower temperature
(entry 2 in Table 1), longer incubation time (entry 3 in Table 1)
9
8.7
10
11
12
9.6
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(4:3)
Acetic acid + triethylamine
(4:3)
18.4
18.6
or D-fructose replaced by D-glucose (entry 4 in Table 1) did not
a
increase the yield. We cut down the usage of acetic acid (entry 5
in Table 1) and found that alkaloid 1 could not be generated. In
the mixture of acetic acid and pyridine, the yield had no obvious
increments (entry 6 in Table 1). Triethylamine replacing pyridine
as component solvent13 (volume ratio = 2:1) could increase the
Mole ratio was the mole of
-alanine to -glucose.
Yield was calculated with
D-alanine to
D-fructose, except that entry 4 was mole
of
D
D
b
D-alanine.
Table 2
Yields of alkaloids 1–6 and corresponding enantiomeric excess (ee)
yield (up to 3.8%). The yield was raised with the augment of D-fruc-
tose (1:1–1:5, entries 7–10 in Table 1). When the ratio of acetic
acid and triethylamine was changed to 4:3, the yield reached
18.4% (entry 11 in Table 1). The mixture solvent could drastically
reduce the side products, including caramel and 5-HMF. So corre-
Entry
Substrate
Product
Yield (%)
Eea (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Alkaloid 1
Alkaloid 2
Alkaloid 3
Alkaloid 4
Alkaloid 5
Alkaloid 6
Compound 1a
Alkaloid 1
18.4
16.7
15.1
15.7
18.5
21.2
18.4
13.8
50
94
96
79
95
93
30
50
D
D
D
D
D
D
-Alanine
-Valine
-Isoleucine
-Leucine
sponding amino acid and D-fructose (5 equiv) were dissolved in
acetic acid and triethylamine (volume ratio = 4:3), then stirred at
80 °C for 5–10 h (monitored by TLC). Alkaloids 2–6 were obtained
in the yield of 15.1–21.2% (Table 2).
-Phenylalanine
-Tyrosine
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra data of synthetic products 1–6
L-Alanine
were identical with those reported data for natural products.2 In
D-Alanine methyl ester
20
view of the specific rotations, the synthetic products 2–5 ([a]
a
D
Yield was calculated with amino acid or amino acid methyl ester.
20
À32 to À88) were consistent with reported data ([
a]
À32 to
D
À88). The products of this route were enantioenriched while the
product by Bu et al. was raceme.9 The specific rotations of alkaloid
alkaloids 1–6 were inferred as R-configuration at C-8 based on lit-
1 found in Capparis spinosa was À33.3 (c 0.05, MeOH),1 which was
erature3 and specific rotations of our final products.
20
in accordance with our final product ([
a]
À36 (c 0.27, MeOH)) of
D
The mechanism of the dehydration of
acids is proposed in Figure 3. First, -fructose and amino acids
D-fructose and amino
D
-alanine. Otherwise, the specific rotations of 1a with S-configura-
D
tion at C8, the product of
L-alanine was +38 (c 0.08, MeOH). So the
formed Schiff base B in acid. Second, the Schiff base could be iso-
merized to enamine C.17 By eliminating one molecule of H2O,
enamine C was converted to intermediate D.18 Then, the nitrogen
attacked the C-5 atom to form the pyrrole ring (E). Effect of elec-
tron pushing of nitrogen atom promoted the removal of 4-hydroxyl
group and the aromatization to pyrrolic compound (F). Finally, our
target products were formed via intramolecular esterification in
acid.
We established the ee of products by high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) analysis employing a Chiralcel OD-H
(250 mm  4.6 mm) column as Table 2. The fact that ee of alkaloids
1 and 1a were 50% and 30% elucidated the conditions of acetic acid
O
R
OH
O
R
O
O
OH
80
䰳, 8h
O
+
HO
N
H2N
OH Et3N, CH3COOH
OH OH
D-fructose
D-amino acid
1: R= Me; 2: R= isopropyl; 3: R=sec-butyl
1-6
4: R=isobutyl; 5: R= benzyl; 6: R= 4-hydroxybenzyl
Scheme 1. Biomimetic synthesis of alkaloids 1–6.