emphasized the role of direct local interactions,4e disper-
sion effects, and charge penetration effects.5
DNB rings reinforced by two hydrogen bonds. Such
homochiral self-recognition is also observed in solution
and has been applied to the development of new chiral
selectors for chromatographic separations.7a,c,9
There have been various innovative experimental mod-
els to study the energetics of the πÀπ interaction, which
often rely on using conformationally restrained molecules
that force two aromatic rings on the molecule to interact in
a particular orientation, such as a sandwich configuration
or a parallel displaced configuration.3a,b,6 However, it is
not clearwhetherresultsfromthesesystemscan be general-
ized since the interacting rings may be oriented in a way
that is energetically unfavorable within the constraints of
the molecule projecting the rings but may be energetically
favorable if the rings are able to assume an optimized
orientation (e.g., horizontal displacement) with respect
to each other. With the foregoing in mind, we postulate
that simple small molecule chiral recognition systems
will provide excellent models to study the nature of πÀπ
interactions and the influence of substituents on these
interactions.
Indeed, πÀπ interactions have been an essential element
in the design of chiral selectors and chiral catalysts.7 The
πÀπ sandwich interaction between a highly electron-
deficient aromatic ring and a highly electron-rich ring
has been designed into many chiral recognition systems.7b
Moreover, the parallel displaced interaction between two
electron-deficient rings has been observed in the solid state
of several small molecule chiral recognition systems.8 For
instance, we reported the homochiral self-recognition be-
tween enantiomers of 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl (DNB) leucine
amide derivatives.8a The chiral recognition mechanism
involves a parallel displaced πÀπ interaction between the
To fully explore the influence of substituents on πÀπ
interactions, we have expanded our study of chiral self-
recognition to include a variety of 3-substituted and
3,5-disubstituted benzoylleucine diethyl amides of varying
electronic character. Structures of the compounds crystal-
lized in this study are depicted in Figure 1. Our goal was to
determine whether replacement of the DNB ring with
aromatic rings of varying electron character would result
in similar homochiral dimerization in the solid state and
to determine the influence of substituents on the geometry
of the πÀπ interaction. While the dual hydrogen-
bonding interactions present in the homochiral dimers
(see Figure S2ÀS7 Supporting Information and Abstract
Graphic) will likely provide some degree of steric constraint
which may prevent the rings from assuming their optimal
orientation with respect to each other, examination with
space-filling models suggests that there is a significant
amount of translational and rotational space that the rings
can occupy with respect to each other while still retaining
the dual hydrogen-bonding interactions. Furthermore,
molecular mechanics energy minimization studies revealed
that conformational minima are relatively broad for DNB
amino acid derivatives and rotational barriers of the ben-
zene ring to the benzoyl carbon are low.7b,c Hence, various
low energy conformations are expected to be present, each
of which could contribute to homochiral dimerization. As
the nature of the aromatic substituent is not likely to affect
the rotational barriers, the series of compounds investigated
herein is also expected to be conformationally flexible.
Results of X-ray crystallographic analysis of the 3-sub-
stituted and 3,5-disubstituted benzoylleucine diethyl
amides are shown in Table 1. All compounds were crystal-
lized from hexane/dichloromethane. As shown in entries
1À5 of Table 1, all of the 3-substituted compounds orga-
nize into homochiral dimers in the solid state. Crystal
structuresoffivedifferent 3-substitutedhomochiraldimers
are depictedinFiguresS2a,dÀg (Supporting Information).
Similar to our prior study with 3,5-DNB leucine diethyl
amide 1f, the crystallographic results indicate that three
intermolecular interactions are responsible for chiral self-
recognition, two crossed hydrogen-bonding interactions,
and a parallel displaced πÀπ interaction.8a,9 Notably, the
sandwich configuration was not observed in any of the
crystalline homochiral dimers. As in the prior study, chiral
selection occurs in the unit cell of all of the 3-substituted
dimers, as only homochiral (S,S) and (R,R) dimeric com-
plexes are found. Moreover, as shown in entries 6À9 of
Table 1 and in Figures S2b,hÀj (Supporting Information),
all 3,5-substituted compounds assemble into homochiral
dimers in the solid state, including the electron-rich
3,5-dimethyl-substituted compound (entry 8 in Table 1).
Figure 1. Structure of racemic substituted benzoylleucine
diethyl amides crystallized in this study.
(5) Hohenstein, E. G.; Duan, J.; Sherrill, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 13244–13247.
(6) (a) Xia, J. L.; Liu, S. H.; Cozzi, F.; Mancinelli, M.; Mazzanti, A.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3611–3620. (b) Gung, B. W.; Emenike, B. U.;
Alverz, C. N.; Rakovan, J.; Kirschbaum, K.; Jain, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
2010, 51, 1648–1650. (c) Gung, B. W.; Xue, X.; Reich, H. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 3641–3644.
(7) (a) Snyder, S. E.; Carey, J. R.; Pirkle, W. H. Tetrahedron 2005, 61,
7562–7567. (b) Pirkle, W. H.; Pochapsky, T. C. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89,
347–362. (c) Pirkle, W. H.; Pochapsky, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5975–5982.
(8) (a) Snyder, S. E.; Volkers, P. I.; Engebretson, D. A.; Lee, W.;
Pirkle, W. H.; Carey, J. R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2341–2343. (b) Koscho,
M. E.; Spence, P. L.; Prikle, W. H. Tetrahedron: Asymmerty 2005, 16,
3147–3153.
(9) Lee, W.; Snyder, S. E.; Volkers, P. I.; Pirkle, W. H.; Engebretson,
D. A.; Boulanger, W. A.; Lin, H.-S.; Huang, B.-S.; Carey, J. R. Tetra-
hedron 2011, 67, 7143–7147.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX