Angewandte
Chemie
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201108211
Oxidative Olefin Arylation
Oxidative Heck Arylation for the Stereoselective Synthesis of
Tetrasubstituted Olefins Using Nitroxides as Oxidants**
Zhiheng He, Sylvia Kirchberg, Roland Frçhlich, and Armido Studer*
The Heck arylation belongs to the most important methods
a solution of 1 with PhB(OH)2, KF, [Pd(acac)2] (5 mol%), and
À
for C C bond formation and has therefore found widespread
TEMPO in propionic acid was stirred at room temperature,
product 2a was obtained with excellent diastereoselectivity
(E only) in 96% yield [Eq. (2)]. Double phenylation, which is
a problem when Pd(OAc)2 is used as the catalyst, was not
application in organic synthesis.[1] Various halides or pseudo
halides are readily cross-coupled with olefins under Pd
catalysis. In contrast, the oxidative Heck reaction using aryl
boronic acids in combination with an external oxidant and
a Pd catalyst has been less intensively investigated.[2,3]
Oxidative Heck-type coupling is strongly influenced by the
olefin substituents and therefore lacks generality. In partic-
ular the synthesis of highly substituted olefins using this
approach is not established. The regio- and stereoselective
synthesis of highly substituted olefins is very challenging.[4]
Herein we describe the mild and highly stereoselective
À
sequential oxidative Pd-catalyzed C H arylation of alkenes
for the synthesis of alkyltriarylethenes.
Our approach was based on the fact that substituents at
the olefin strongly influence the regio- and stereoselectivity of
the oxidative Heck coupling.[2] The goal was to develop an
iterative threefold Heck sequence starting from methyl
acrylate (1) [Eq. (1)]. The ester substituent is readily reduced
observed.[7] Under these mild conditions, other aryl boronic
acids bearing electron-rich and also electron-poor substitu-
ents reacted with complete diastereoselectivity (E only,
2b–d).
The best yields for the introduction of the second aryl group
were achieved upon reacting 2 with an arylboronic acid, KF,
4-HO-TEMPO, and Pd(OAc)2 in propionic acid at room
temperature (Table 1).[8a] With [Pd(acac)2] under otherwise
identical conditions only moderate yields were obtained.
The nature of the arylboronic acid influenced the
reactivity and selectivity. The highest selectivity was achieved
with the electron-poor CF3-substituted congener (> 98:2, see
3b), whereas with 4-MeC6H4B(OH)2 (27:1, 3a) and 4-
MeOC6H4B(OH)2 (10:1, 3c) lower selectivities resulted.
Encouraged by these results we decided to test also non-
acrylate-based disubstituted olefins and found that stilbene
and its derivatives reacted efficiently. In these reactions we
used pivalic acid/THF (5:1) as the solvent mixture.[8b]
Excellent yields and good selectivities were obtained in the
reaction of trans-stilbene with meta- and para-substituted aryl
boronic acids (3e–h). However, the yield dropped signifi-
cantly for the ortho-tolyl derivative, probably for steric
reasons (3i). We unambiguously assigned the relative config-
uration of 3e by X-ray analysis (Figure 1).[9] The stereochem-
ical outcome of the reaction agreed with that expected for an
oxidative Heck-type coupling.[2] Other compounds were
assigned by analogy. The unsymmetrical trans-phenyl-o-
tolylethene reacted with with PhB(OH)2 in good regioselec-
to the hydroxymethyl group to adjust the reactivity of the
intermediate olefins. Moreover, the allylic OH group can be
further chemically modified to vary the fourth substituent.
Methyl acrylate (1) is a well-established olefin for Heck
coupling with aryl boronic acids. Various oxidants have been
used to conduct that reaction.[2] After some experimentation
we found that the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl rad-
ical (TEMPO)[5,6] is a suitable oxidant for this reaction. When
[*] Z. He, Dr. S. Kirchberg, Dr. R. Frçhlich, Prof. Dr. A. Studer
Organisch-Chemisches Institut
Westfꢀlische Wilhelms-Universitꢀt
Corrensstrasse 40, 48149, Mꢁnster (Germany)
E-mail: studer@uni-muenster.de
=
tivity for steric reasons (9:1, 3l), and PhCH CHC6F5 deliv-
ered only one regioisomer 3j, probably for electronic reasons.
As expected, when the electronic difference of the aryl
substituents was not that pronounced (see, for example, 4-
[**] This work was financially supported by the Chinese Scholarship
Council (stipend to Z.H.). We thank Dr. Peter Nesvadba, BASF
Basel, for a gift of nitroxide 8 and Benjamin Vonhçren for
conducting some experiments.
=
CH3OC6H4CH CHC6H4-4-CF3), the regioselectivity was
lower (3:1, 3k). With respect to the yield, the reaction was
generally more efficient for electron-rich olefins. Excellent
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3699 –3702
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3699