G. Deng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3973–3977
3977
Table 5
The mouse PK, brain–blood ratio and lymphopenia
No.
Mouse PK (2 mg/kg)
Br/Br ratio
Lymphopenia
37% (4 h), >100% (24 h)
17d
T1/2: 5.40 h; F: >100% Cmax 1.07
l
g/mL AUC0–24 h: 10.3
lg h/mL
1.45 (1 h), 3.73 (4 h)
S1P1 agonist without S1P3 agonistic activity. Extension of the acid
side chain by one carbon (17e) resulted in lower S1P1 potency. A
similar S1P1 potency was observed when the piperidine N was
moved inside ring (17f). The potency was much improved by fur-
ther extension of the side chain by one carbon (17g) but the com-
pound was also suffered from undesirable S1P3 activity. The
piperazine analogue (17h) demonstrated comparable S1P1 potency
however still with S1P3 activity. Similarly, the S1P3 activity could
not be mitigated by changing the side chain length (17i and 17j)
or moving the carboxylic acid around the piperidine ring (17k).
The azetidine analogue (17l) was found to be much less potent
compared with the piperidine derivative (17d), probably due to a
shorter side chain. When the side chain length was increased by
one or two carbon, the S1P1 potency was improved drastically
(17m and 17n). Both compounds still showed significant S1P3 ago-
nistic activity. The amino acid compounds in Table 4 suggested
that nitrogen atom in the proper position would facilitate the bind-
ing affinity and improve potency, which confirmed the modeling
findings.
Compound 17d was selected for further progress in in vivo
studies due to its good S1P1 potency (pEC50 = 9.2), minimal unde-
sirable S1P3 activity (pEC50 <5.5), and good overall physiochemical
properties. In mouse CNS penetration study (iv dosing), compound
17d showed good brain to blood ratio (BBR at 1 h and 4 h post dos-
ing are 1.45 and 3.73, respectively; Table 5). The mouse PK study
(p.o. dosing, 2 mg/kg) revealed that this compound had very good
oral bioavailability (ꢀ100%) and a moderate half-life (5.40 h, p.o.)
in correspondence with its low clearance (3.68 mL/min/kg, iv)
and moderate volume of distribution (1.48 L/kg, iv). The compound
was evaluated in the in vivo efficacy study. In the acute mouse
lymphopenia model, 17d turned out to be efficacious at 1 mg/kg
(37% lymphocyte reduction at 4 h). And the lymphopenia effect
was transient. The lymphocytes count measured at 24 h was back
to normal (100% of baseline). Indeed, this transient lymphopenia
profile was desired for MS treatment, and the sustained lymphope-
nia observed from FTY720 (blood lymphocytes were reduced to
20% of baseline and after drug cessation lymphocyte counts only
return to baseline values after 4–8 weeks) was believed to be
responsible for its serious infection side effects in clinical trial.18,19
In summary, we have discovered a novel benzoxazole series of
selective S1P1 agonist based on knowledge-based scaffold hopping
combined with computational approaches. Among these ana-
logues, compound 17d was identified to have good S1P1 agonistic
potency with S1P3 selectivity. Compound 17d demonstrated high
brain penetration and favorable pharmacokinetic properties in
mice. Oral dosing of compound 17d in mice resulted in a statisti-
cally significant reduction in circulating lymphocytes at 4 h post-
dosing and back to normal at 24 h.
References and notes
1. Meng, Q.; Zhao, B.; Xu, Q.; Xu, X.; Deng, G.; Li, C.; Luan, L.; Ren, F.; Wang, H.; Xu,
H.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xiang, J.-N.; Elliott, J. D.; Guo, T. B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lu,
H.; Lin, X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 2794.
2. Brinkmann, V.; Billich, A.; Baumruker, T.; Heining, P.; Schmouder, R.; Francis,
G.; Aradhye, S.; Burtin, P. Nat. Rev. 2010, 9, 883.
3. FDA approves first oral drug to reduce MS relapses; FDA news release Sept. 22,
2010;
4. Rosen, H.; Alfonso, C.; Surh, C. D.; McHeyzer-Williams, M. G. PNAS 2003, 100,
10907.
5. Hale, J. J.; Doherty, G.; Toth, L.; Mills, S. G.; Hajdu, R.; Keohane, C. A.; Rosenbach,
M.; Milligan, J.; Shei, G.-J.; Chrebet, G.; Bergstrom, J.; Card, D.; Forrest, M.; Sun,
S.-Y.; West, S.; Xie, H.; Nomura, N.; Rosen, H.; Mandalab, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2004, 14, 3501.
6. Buzard, D.; Han, S.; Thoresen, L.; Moody, J.; Lopez, L.; Kawasaki, A.; Schrader, T.;
Sage, C.; Gao, Y.; Edwards, J.; Barden, J.; Thatte, J.; Fu, L.; Solomon, M.; Liu, L.;
Al-Shamma, H.; Gatlin, J.; Le, M.; Xing, C.; Espinola, S.; Jones, R. M. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 6013.
7. Kurata, H.; Kusumi, K.; Otsuki, K.; Suzuki, R.; Kurono, M.; Takada, Y.; Shioya, H.;
Komiya, T.; Mizuno, H.; Ono, T.; Hagiya, H.; Minami, M.; Nakade, S.; Habashit,
H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 3885.
8. Nishi, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Takemoto, T.; Suzuki, K.; Iio, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Ohnuki, T.;
Kawase, Y.; Nara, F.; Inaba, S.; Izumi, T.; Yuita, H.; Oshima, K.; Doi, H.; Inoue, R.;
Tomisato, W.; Kagari, T.; Shimozato, T. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 368.
9. Bolli, M. H.; Abele, S.; Binkert, C.; Bravo, R.; Buchmann, S.; Bur, D.; Gatfield, J.;
Hess, P.; Kohl, C.; Mangold, C.; Mathys, B.; Menyhart, K.; Müller, C.; Nayler, O.;
Scherz, M.; Schmidt, G.; Sippel, V.; Steiner, B.; Strasser, D.; Treiber, A.; Weller, T.
J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4198.
10. Cee, V. J.; Frohn, M.; Lanman, B. A.; Golden, J.; muller, K.; Neira, S.; Pickrell, A.;
Arnett, H.; Buys, J.; Gore, A.; Fiorino, M.; Horner, M.; Itano, A.; Lee, M. R.;
McElvain, M.; Middleton, S.; Schrag, M.; Rivenzon-Segal, D.; Vargas, H. M.; Xu,
H.; Xu, Y.; Zang, X.; Siu, J.; Wong, M.; Burli, R. W. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2,
107.
11. Walker, J. K. Discovery of a potent and selective S1P1 receptor agonist for the
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis ACS meeting Mar 21–25, 2010; San
Francisco, CA.
12. Ahmed, M.; Myatt, J.; Norton, D.; Rivers, D. A. From PCT Int. Appl. WO
2008074821A1, 2008.
13. S1P1 Tango assay was conducted according to manufacturer’s protocol (Catalog
K1520, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
14. S1P3 GeneBLAzer assay was conducted according to manufacturer’s protocol
(Catalog K1713, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
15. We built a S1P1 homology model using Rhodopsin as a template. Sequence
alignment and initial homology modeling were performed using the Molecular
Operating Environment (MOE, 2009) from the Chemical Computing Group, Inc.
Initial molecular docking attempt for compound 16f with Glide molecular
docking method failed to produce successful placement of the molecule within
the ligand binding site, mainly due to the limited space of the accessible ligand
binding pocket. To further explore 16f’s possible binding mode in S1P1,
induced fit docking, a more advanced in-silico docking protocol that treats
protein structure flexibility, was adopted.
16. Pan, S.; Mi, Y.; Pally, C.; Beerli, C.; Chen, A.; Guerini, D.; Hinterding, K.;
Nuesslein-Hildesheim, B.; Tuntland, T.; Lefebvre, S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, W.; Chu, A.;
Brinkmann, V.; Bruns, C.; Streiff, M.; Cannet, C.; Cooke, N.; Gray, N. Chem. Biol.
2006, 13, 1227.
17. Schürer, S. C.; Brown, S. J.; Cabrera, P. G.; Schaeffer, M.-T.; Chapman, J.; Jo, E.;
Chase, P.; Spicer, T.; Hodder, P.; Rosen, H. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 486.
18. Morris, M. A.; Gibb, D. R.; Picard, F.; Brinkmann, V.; Straume, M.; Ley, K. Eur. J.
Immunol. 2005, 35, 3570.
19. Park, S. I.; Felipe, C. R.; Machado, P. G.; Garcia, R.; Skerjanec, A.; Schmouder, R.;
Tedesco-Silva, H., Jr.; Medina-Pestana, J. O. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005, 38, 683.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Eric Yang, Hong Lu, Zongping Zhang, Jiansong
Yang, Jinqiang Zhang, Jiansong Yang, Wei Zhang, Frankie S. Mak,
for their helpful comments and discussions.