3956
G. M. Schroeder et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3951–3956
Table 4
In summary, potent pyrazole and pyrimidine acylsulfonamide
Cellular antiproliferative activity (2% FCS)a
inhibitors with dual activity against Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were
identified. Compounds were optimized for binding to essential
pockets such as I88, L92, I95, and F99 which are normally occupied
by pro-apoptotic family members. An X-ray co-crystal structure
with Bcl-xL confirmed the proposed binding mode. Compounds
demonstrated on-target mechanistic inhibition of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL
through cytochrome c release and BAK oligomerization in isolated
mitochondria. Further evidence of target inhibition was demon-
strated by whole cell mitochondria depolarization in MV-4-11
cells. Improved cellular antiproliferative activity was achieved
relative to the original lead pyrazole typified by 2.
Compd
SUDHL-4 IC50
(
lM)
MV-4-11 IC50 (lM)
3j
2.35
2.49
>10
2.02
6.64
3.79
0.70
1.43
5.06
0.58
0.33
0.33
3k
3o
3u
4j
4k
a
For assay conditions see Ref. 9.
References and notes
1. For recent reviews see: (a) Chipuk, J. E.; Green, D. R. Trends Cell Bio. 2008, 18,
157; (b) Youle, R. J.; Strasser, A. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 47; (c) Leber,
B.; Lin, J.; Andrews, D. W. Oncogene 2010, 29, 5221; (d) Tait, S. W. G.; Green, D.
R. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 2010, 11, 1.
2. Sperandio, O.; Reynes, C. H.; Camproux, A.-C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Drug Discov.
Today 2010, 15, 220. and references therein.
3. Cummings, C. G.; Hamilton, A. D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 1.
4. Vogler, M.; Dinsdale, M.; Dyer, M. J. S.; Cohen, G. M. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16,
360.
5. Barelier, S.; Pons, J.; Marcillat, O.; Lancelin, J.-M.; Krimm, I. J. Med. Chem. 2010,
53, 2577.
6. (a) Bruncko, M.; Oost, T. K.; Belli, B. A.; Ding, H.; Joseph, M. K.; Kunzer, A.;
Matineau, D.; McClellan, W. J.; Mitten, M.; Ng, S.-C.; Nimmer, P. M.; Oltersdorf,
T.; Park, C.-M.; Petros, A. M.; Shoemaker, A. R.; Song, X.; Wang, X.; Wendt, M.
D.; Zhang, H.; Fesik, S. W.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Elmore, S. W. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50,
641; (b) Park, C.-M.; Bruncko, M.; Adickes, J.; Bauch, J.; Ding, H.; Kunzer, A.;
Marsh, K. C.; Nimmer, P.; Shoemaker, A. R.; Song, X.; Tahir, S. K.; Tse, C.; Wang,
X.; Wendt, M. D.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H.; Fesik, S. W.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Elmore, S.
W. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 6902.
7. (a) Tse, C.; Shoemaker, A. R.; Adickes, J.; Anderson, M. G.; Chen, J.; Jin, S.;
Johnson, E. F.; Marsh, K. C.; Mitten, M. J.; Nimmer, P.; Roberts, L.; Tahir, S. K.;
Xiao, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H.; Fesik, S.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Elmore, S. W. Cancer Res.
2008, 68, 3421; (b) Ackler, S.; Mitten, M. J.; Foster, K.; Oleksijew, A.; Refici, M.;
Tahir, S. K.; Xiao, Y.; Tse, C.; Frost, D. J.; Fesik, S. W.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Elmore, S.
W.; Shoemaker, A. R. Cancer Chemother. Phamacol. 2010, 66, 869.
8. Vogler, M.; Furdas, S. D.; Jung, M.; Kuwana, T.; Dyer, M. J. S.; Cohen, G. M. Clin.
Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 4217.
Figure 3. Cytochrome c release and BAK oligomerization from isolated mitochon-
dria of MV-4-11 cells.
9. Perez, H. L.; Banfi, P.; Bertrand, J.; Cai, Z.-W.; Grebinski, J.; Kim, K.; Lippy, J.;
Modugno, M.; Naglich, J.; Schmidt, R. J.; Tebben, A.; Vianello, P.; Wei, D. D.;
Zhang, L.; Galvani, A.; Lombardo, L. J.; Borzilleri, R. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2012, 22. preceding paper.
10. Mei, T.-S.; Giri, R.; Maugel, N.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5215.
11. Deng, X.; Mani, N. S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1307.
12. Miura, M.; Koike, T.; Ishihara, T.; Hirayama, F.; Sakamoto, S.; Okada, M.; Ohta,
M.; Tsukamoto, S.-I. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 3809.
13. The structure was deposited in the PDB as 4EHR.
14. Deng, J.; Carlson, N.; Takeyama, K.; Dal Cin, P.; Shipp, M.; Letai, A. Cancer Cell
2007, 12, 171.
15. For assay conditions see Ref. 9.
16. Representative characterization data: (a) 3j; 1H NMR (CD3OD) d 8.73 (s, 1H),
8.12–7.98 (m, 6H), 7.73–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.63–6.94 (m, 13H), 4.62–4.18 (m, 4H),
3.65–3.17 (m, 2H), 2.79–2.45 (m, 4H), 1.31–0.91 (m, 4H), 0.65–0.58 (m, 3H);
MS(ESI+) m/z 825.1 (M+H)+; (b) 4j, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 1:1 mixture of amide
rotamers) d 9 .16 (s, 1H), 8.42–8.14 (m, 4 H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d,
J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.47 (m, 5H), 7.15–7.04 (m, 2 H), 6.94 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 0.5H),
6.85 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 0.5H), 5.43 (br s, 1H), 4.48 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (d,
J = 17.6 Hz, 1H), 3.45–2.98 (m, 5H), 2.88–2.48 (m, 5H), 1.65–1.23 (m, 4H), 1.01–
0.51 (m, 6H); MS(ESI+) m/z 745.1 (M+H)+; (c) 4k, 1H NMR (CD3OD, 1:1 mixture
of amide rotamers) d 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.96 (br s, 1H), 8.24 (br s, 1H), 8.14–8.04 (m,
2H), 7.85–7.49 (m, 5H), 7.16–6.89 (m, 3H), 6.82 (br s, 1H), 5.22–5.05 (m, 1H),
4.53 (br s, 1H), 4.24 (br s, 1H), 3.45–3.05 (m, 5H), 2.80–2.34 (m, 3H), 1.65–1.50
(m, 4H), 0.99–0.52 (m, 6H); MS(ESI+) m/z 746.1 (M+H)+.
17. Whole cell depolarization assay: The human acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
cell line, MV-4-11 (CRL-9591), was purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA) and routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium
(GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Logarithmically growing cells were
concentrated by low-speed centrifugation, suspended in serum-free RPMI-
Figure 4. Average percent population of depolarized mitochondria in MV-4-11
cells.
failed to show induction of BAK oligomerization at higher concen-
trations (data not shown). This may be due to poor aqueous solu-
bility at higher concentrations.
1640 medium and stained using the cationic dye, MitoProbe JC-1 (2 lM, 0.5%
DMSO, 30 min, 37 °C), following the manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR). Stained cells were concentrated by low-speed
centrifugation, suspended in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2%
fetal bovine serum and subjected to compound treatment (5 Â 105 per well
Finally, pyrazole 3j and pyrimidines 4j and 4k were tested for
their effects on mitochondria depolarization in whole cells
(Fig. 4).16 All three compounds induced ꢀ25% depolarized
mitochondria in MV-4-11 AML cells after treatment for 7 h at a
of
a 96-well plate, 7 h, 37 °C). Cellular mitochondria depolarization was
measured by flow cytometry (FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and
the data analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR).
concentration of 3
evidence of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL inhibition.
l
M.17 This activity provides further mechanistic