C. Fischer, A. König, H.-J. Drexler, D. Heller
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Data in Table 1 show that significant distances and angles Table 1. Selected distances /Å and bond angles /° of the isolated com-
plexes with aniline and its derivatives.
in the three complexes are very similar.
Arene
Distance /Å
Rh–P
Distance /Å
Angle /°
P–Rh–P
Rh–η6C
aniline
2,230–
2,280–
95,48(5)
2,254(2)
2,238–
2,485(6)
2,260–
N-methylaniline
95,69;
2,254(2)
2,6-dimethylaniline 2,227–
2,242(1)
2,522(4)
2,263–
2,552(3)
97,22(4)
95,34(3)
MEA in the prochiral substrate load lead to a drop in the cata-
lyst activity,[6,7] probably because of the formation of inactive
(hydride ?) arene complexes.
Conclusions
In summary it has been shown that cationic rhodium diphos-
phine solvate complexes react with aniline and its derivatives
to give stable arene complexes. X-ray structures of three such
complexes containing the ligand DPPF and respectively ani-
line, N-methylaniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline are provided.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of the cation [Rh(DPPF)(N-methyl-η6-
aniline)]BF4; ORTEP, 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity. Selected distances and bond angles are summarized
in Table 1. CCDC-861121.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this article):
31P NMR spectra of the rhodium diphosphine solvate complexes, crys-
tallographic data, specification of data collection and structural refine-
ment of the prepared X-Ray structures.
References
[1] a) J. Halpern, D. P. Riley, A. S. C. Chan, J. J. Pluth, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1977, 99, 8055–8057; b) A. Preetz, W. Baumann, H.-J.
Drexler, C. Fischer, J. Sun, A. Spannenberg, O. Zimmer, W. Hell,
D. Heller, Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 1979–1982.
[2] T. Yamagata, K. Tani, Y. Tatsuno, T. Saito, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1988, 466–468.
[3] D. Heller, H.-J. Drexler, A. Spannenberg, B. Heller, J. You, W.
Baumann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 777–780.
[4] Up to now there are very less examples in literature describing the
hydrogenation of unprotected amino acids: Y. Hsiao, N. R. Rivera,
T. Rosner, S. W. Krska, E. Njolito, F. Wang, Y. Sun, J. D. Arm-
strong III, E. J. J. Grabowski, R. D. Tillyer, F. Spindler, C. Malan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9918–9919.
[5] a) M. J. Burk, C. S. Kalberg, A. Pizzano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 4345–4353; b) H.-J. Drexler, J. You, S. Zhang, C. Fischer, W.
Baumann, A. Spannenberg, D. Heller, Org. Process Res. Dev.
2003, 7, 355–361.
[6] H.-U. Blaser, R. Hanreich, H.-D. Schneider, F. Spindler, B. Stein-
acher, in Asymmetric Catalysis on Industrial Scale, (Eds.: H.-U.
Blaser, E. Schmidt), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
Weinheim, 2004, pp. 55–70.
[7] H.-U. Blaser, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, A. Togni, C. R. Chim. 2002,
5, 1–7.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of the cation [Rh(DPPF)(aniline)]BF4;
ORTEP, 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for
clarity. Selected distances and bond angles are summarized in Table 1.
CCDC-861120.
The apparent high stability of such rhodium-arene com-
plexes and their iridium analogues might lead to deactivation
phenomena in catalysis.[3,5] An example is provided by the
industrial synthesis of Metolachlor. In the key step the so-
called “MEA imine” ((E)-2-ethyl-N-(1-methoxypropan-2-ylid-
ene)-6-methylaniline) is hydrogenated stereoselectively with a
chiral iridium complex. The substrate is prepared by condensa-
tion of 2-ethyl-6-methylaniline (MEA) with methoxyacetone.
During process optimization it has been shown that traces of
Received: January 11, 2012
Published Online:
2
© 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012, 1–3