3996
M. A. Schmidt et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3994–3997
O
N
OH
Cl
O
CO2H
N
Br
Na2HPO4
EtOAc
N
H
N
H
F3C
CF3
22
CO2H
3
21
23
Scheme 2. Cycloaddition between 3 and 21.
In an attempt to obtain better regioselectivity, we next consid-
ered enol-based dipolarophiles generated from -ketoester 12
to afford the isoxazole. A subsequent treatment with 1.0 equiv
BF3ÁOEt2 was required to achieve elimination. The crude mixture
was then hydrolyzed with LiOH to afford the acid 22 in 35% overall
yield with no detectable amounts of the undesired regioisomer.
It is noteworthy that 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorocrotonic acid (21,
94:6 Z:E)18 was also a highly selective dipolarophile, yielding the
desired 4-trifluoromethyl isoxazole acid 22 in approximately 30%
yield (Scheme 2). A major side product found in this reaction
was diphenylurea (23), which presumably was formed by the ni-
trile oxide (or chlorooxime 3) undergoing a Beckmann rearrange-
ment mediated by the carboxylate of 21 to from phenyl
isocyanate, which can react further to form 23.19
In summary, a regioselective synthesis of ethyl 3-phenyl-4-(tri-
fluoromethyl)isoxazole-5-carboxylate 1 was developed. A key find-
ing in this study involves the achievement of high regioselectivity
in a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition by introduction of an enol ether at
the C2-position of crotonate 4. The 2-alkoxy crotonate provided a
stable dipolarophile relative to the highly sensitive 4,4,4-trifluoro-
methyl enolate and circumvented the formation of dioxazole side
products. DFT computational studies supported the critical role
of inductively electron-withdrawing substituents at the C2-posi-
tion in guiding regioselectivities of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition.
a
(Table 1, entry 3). As predicted, the cycloaddition between 1211
and chlorooxime 3 in the presence of triethylamine (2 equiv) in
DMA at À20 °C afforded exclusively the desired 4-trifluoromethyl
isoxazole 1 in 55% yield. The moderate yield was attributed to
byproduct formation and decomposition of 12 (Fig. 2) via a cascade
elimination of the fluoride under basic conditions.12 The byproduct
distribution could be controlled by changing reaction conditions.
Using less polar solvents (dichloromethane, toluene) and/or inor-
ganic bases (sodium and potassium phosphates, carbonates, and
hydroxides) led to the formation of adduct 20 as the major product
with various amounts of nitrile oxide dimers 18 and 19. We attri-
bute these results to the unsuccessful generation of the corre-
sponding enol of 12. We found that temperature and base
strength affected the rate of decomposition of substrate 12 pre-
sumably via its unstable enol form. Running the reaction at
À20 °C, we achieved the best yield of product 1. When a stronger
amine base such as DBU was used, however, only trace amounts
of product were formed. Clearly, our expectation of using the elec-
tron withdrawing ester functionality in 12 to circumvent the
known E1cB-type of elimination of fluoride12 was not completely
successful.
Although using a-ketoester 12 as the dipolarophile led to exclu-
Acknowledgements
sive formation of the desired 4-trifluoromethylisoxazole 1, the low
throughput resulting from the instability of the substrate ham-
pered its practical application. To address this issue, we decided
to explore ethyl enol ether 13 as a dipolarophile. The Z-ethyl enol
ether 13 was prepared via a Wittig reaction between (1,2-dieth-
oxy-2-oxoethyl)triphenylphosphonium chloride and 1-ethoxy-
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol in 44% unoptimized yield.13 The cycloaddi-
tion between enol ether 13 and chlorooxime 3 (2.0 equiv) in the
presence of triethylamine in DMA at 60 °C afforded the desired
4-trifluoromethyl isoxazole 9 as a single regioisomer in 79% yield.
While adduct 20 was not observed in this reaction, significant
amounts of nitrile oxide dimers 18 and 19 were observed due to
the use of excess chlorooxime. To minimize the dimerization, chlo-
rooxime 3 was added in portions over 8 h at 60 °C. The slow addi-
tion led to greatly lowered levels of dimers 18 and 19, however at a
noticeable expense of product yield (70%). Interestingly, the E-enol
ether of 1314 was unreactive under the reaction conditions, possi-
bly due to the development of 1,3-allylic strain in the
cycloaddition.15
We thank Drs David Kronenthal, Robert Waltermire, David Con-
lon, Martin Eastgate, and Lopa Desai for assistance reviewing the
manuscript.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. (a) Please see for recent examples: Chan, D. M.-K.; Kamireddy, B.; Long, J. K.;
Patel, K. M.; Sharpe, P. L. WO 040152 A1, 2005.; (b) Fukui, Y.; Sasatani, T.;
Matsumura, K.; Ishizuka, N.; Yano, T.; Kanda, Y.; Chomei, N. WO 054213 A1,
2005.; (c) Siddiqui, M. A.; Mansoor, U. F.; Reddy, P. A. P.; Madison, V. S. U.S.
0167426 A1, 2007.; (d) Murugesan, N.; Ewing, W.; Gu, Z.; Yu, G.; Macor, J. E.
WO 109456 A2, 2007.; (e) Chiba, Y.; Kono, T.; Shibata, C.; Tomura, N.; Akase, T.;
Banba, S. JP 73181(A), 2009.; (f) Suzuki, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Tamura, A.;
Nishizawa, T.; Yamaguchi, M. WO 004972 A1, 2010.
In addition to ethyl enol ether 13, we examined vinyl acetate 14
and the bulkier benzoate 15 and tosylate 16 as dipolarophiles (Ta-
ble 2). These dipolarophiles afforded the desired 4-trifluoromethyl
isoxazole 1 exclusively, but with greatly diminished yields. Again,
the high regioselectivities observed for 13–16 indicated that these
substrates possess the satisfactory electronic (rather than steric)16
requirements, which appear to be more influential to the regiose-
lective outcome. The low yields of isoxazole 1 were primarily
caused by the de-acylative decomposition of acyloxyenoates 13–
16 under basic conditions.
2. (a) Shimizu, M.; Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 214; (b) Schlosser,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5432; (c) Kirk, K. L. Org. Process Res. Dev.
2008, 12, 305.
3. Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1990, 29, 1320.
4. (a) Leroy, J.; Cantacuzene, D.; Wakselman, C. Synthesis 1982, 313; (b) Shen, Y.;
Zheng, J.; Huang, Y. Synthesis 1985, 970; (c) Meazza, G.; Capuzzi, L.; Piccardi, P.
Synthesis 1989, 331; (d) Chi, K.-W.; Kim, H.-A.; Furin, G. G.; Zhuzhgov, E. L.;
Protzuk, N. J. Fluorine Chem. 2001, 110, 11; (e) Wang, H. J.; Ling, W.; Lu, L. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2001, 111, 241; (f) Hamper, B. C.; Leschinsky, K. L. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 2003, 40, 575; (g) Watterson, S. H.; Dyckman, A.; Pitts, W.; Spergel, S. WO
2010085581 A1, 2010.; (h) Gilmore, J, L.; Sheppeck, J. E. WO 2011017578 A1,
2011.; (i) Cherney, R. J.; Zhang, Y. WO 2011133734 A1, 2011.; (j) Watterson, S.
H.; Dyckman, A.; Pitts, W.; Spergel, S. J. Med. Chem. Manuscript in preparation.
5. Jäger, V.; Colinas, P. A. In The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, Volume 59:
Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry Toward Heterocycles
and Natural Products, Padwa, A.; Pearson, W. H., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:
New York, 2002; p 361.
The cycloaddition of enamine 1717 (ꢀ1:1 Z:E, Table 2) was stud-
ied. Similar to the ethyl enol ether, the E-isomer was unreactive,
whereas the Z-isomer reacted smoothly to form the intermediate
isoxazoline adduct. This species did not eliminate benzyl carbamate