Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 3 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C8CC00847G
ChemComm
COMMUNICATION
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
(3)
Notes and references
1.
Hartwig, J. F. Organotransition Metal Chemistry: From
Bonding to Catalysis; University Science Books: 2010.
L. Rosenberg, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 2845-2855.
D. S. Glueck, Dalton Trans., 2008, 5276-5286.
A. A. Trifonov, I. V. Basalov and A. A. Kissel, Dalton Trans.,
2016, 45, 19172-19193.
separation from iron-containing byproducts was successful, though
phosphorus-containing byproducts, including one consistent with
the vinylphosphine, remained. One byproduct, tris(4-
methylphenyl)phosphine, was consistently formed in about 10% in
both thermal and photo-driven reactions. This observation parallels
α-phosphinidene elimination that has recently been reported for
2.
3.
4.
5.
C. A. Bange and R. Waterman, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22,
12598-12605.
J. K. Pagano, C. A. Bange, S. E. Farmiloe and R. Waterman,
Organometallics, 2017.
CpFeMe(CO)2.26
methylphenyl)phosphine produce
Control
reactions
of
1
and
bis(4-
6.
a
similar quantity of tris(4-
methylphenyl)phosphine among other unidentified products.
Efforts to replicate the PR group transfer chemistry reported for
CpFeMe(CO)2 using 1 were unsuccessful,26 indicating that 1 has
limited efficacy for α-phosphinidene elimination. More germane,
these observations suggest that modification of the phosphine
under these reaction conditions has a powerful effect on the
resulting yield of double hydrophosphination products.
Hydrophosphination with substrates other than diphenylphosphine
has been limited,5 which argues for greater exploration in this area,
especially for double hydrophosphination.
7.
N. K. Gusarova, N. A. Chernysheva and B. A. Trofimov,
Synthesis, 2017, 49, 4783-4807.
M. M. I. Basiouny and J. A. R. Schmidt, Organometallics,
2017.
K. J. Gallagher and R. L. Webster, Chem. Commun., 2014,
50, 12109-12111.
M. Espinal-Viguri, A. K. King, J. P. Lowe, M. F. Mahon and
R. L. Webster, ACS Catalysis, 2016, 6, 7892-7897.
K. J. Gallagher, M. Espinal-Viguri, M. F. Mahon and R. L.
Webster, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2016, 358, 2460-2468.
R. Waterman, Dalton Trans., 2009, 18-26.
M. B. Ghebreab, C. A. Bange and R. Waterman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 9240-9243.
8.
9.
10.
11.
From prior study,27 1 dissociates into two equivalents of
12.
13.
•
CpFe(CO)2
under thermal or photochemical conditions, and
conducting this dissociation in the presence of diphenylphosphine
results in formation of an equivalent of CpFe(PPh2)(CO)2 and
CpFeH(CO)2,24 the latter of which is known to decompose to 1.28
While side reactions may occur, it is reasonable to presume that the
key iron-phosphido intermediate in these reactions is
CpFe(PPh2)(CO)2. Nakazawa has proposed Cp′Fe(PPh2)(CO) (Cp′ = Cp
or Cp*) as the key intermediate in double hydrophosphination
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
C. A. Bange and R. Waterman, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 6413-
6416.
M. Kamitani, M. Itazaki, C. Tamiya and H. Nakazawa, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 11932-11935.
M. Itazaki, S. Katsube, M. Kamitani and H. Nakazawa,
Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 3163-3166.
J. Yuan, L. Zhu, J. Zhang, J. Li and C. Cui, Organometallics,
2017, 36, 455-459.
Y. Zhang, L. Qu, Y. Wang, D. Yuan, Y. Yao and Q. Shen,
Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57, 139-149.
A. Di Giuseppe, R. De Luca, R. Castarlenas, J. J. Perez-
Torrente, M. Crucianelli and L. A. Oro, Chem. Commun.,
2016, 52, 5554-5557.
Marteel-Parrish, A. E.; Abraham, M. A. in Green Chemistry
and Engineering: A Path to Sustainability. 2013, Wiley
Publishing.
D. Bézier, G. T. Venkanna, L. C. M. Castro, J. Zheng, T.
Roisnel, J.-B. Sortais and C. Darcel, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2012, 354, 1879-1884.
L. P. Bheeter, M. Henrion, L. Brelot, C. Darcel, M. J.
Chetcuti, J.-B. Sortais and V. Ritleng, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2012, 354, 2619-2624.
L. C. M. Castro, J.-B. Sortais and C. Darcel, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 151-153.
16
catalyzed by Cp′FeMe(CO)2 derivatives.15, It was suggested that
sluggish catalysis in those systems resulted from coordination of the
phosphine prior to product displacement. The additional carbonyl
ligand appears to be pivotal in accelerating this catalysis, and the
validation of our hypothesis that 1 would afford faster catalysis
provides additional support to Nakazawa’s proposed catalytic
cycle.3f There are still peculiarities to the system such as the poor
reactivity of unactivated alkynes and limitation to internal alkynes
for both copper and iron catalysts that prompts further study of
these systems.
20.
21.
22.
In conclusion, commercially available iron compound
1 is
an efficient catalyst for the double hydrophosphination of
terminal aryl alkynes with diphenylphosphine employing either
visible-light or thermal conditions. This study represents the
first reported double hydrophosphination reaction promoted
by visible-light and provides a complement to the previous
work by Nakazawa and Cui utilizing first-row transition metals
to catalyze this reactivity through thermal methods. Both sets
of conditions (visible light or heat) gave diphosphine products
in excellent yields, were tolerant both electron-withdrawing
and donating substituents on the alkyne, and isolation of these
products without oxidation is shown to be simple.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
J. K. Pagano, C. A. Bange, S. E. Farmiloe and R. Waterman,
Organometallics, 2017, 36, 3891-3895.
T. E. Bitterwolf, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 206–207, 419-
450.
J. K. Pagano, B. J. Ackley and R. Waterman, Chem. Eur. J.,
10.1002/chem.201704954.
This work was supported by the U.S. National Science
Foundation (CHE-1265608 and CHE-1565658).
J. P. Bullock, M. C. Palazotto and K. R. Mann, Inorg. Chem.,
1991, 30, 1284-1293.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Chem. Comm. | 3
Please do not adjust margins