Scheme 5 Oxygen atom transport catalyzed by 6.
reaction proceeded in 97% yield with 1 mol% of 5. When the
same reaction was achieved with 1 mol% of triphenylcorrole
oxo-rhenium(V) complex (ReVO(COR)),15 only 9.8% yield was
observed. Accordingly, the existence of Re–C bond like 5 and 6
would be important for efficient oxygen atom transport. It
should be noted that oxygen atom transport without any metal
complexes required elevated temperature above 230 °C.16
Scheme 4 Plausible mechanism for the catalytic OAT reaction.
In conclusion, the N-confused porphyrin oxorhenium(V) com-
plexes 5 and 6 were prepared for the first time and their struc-
tures were elucidated by X-ray crystallographic analysis. These
complexes can transport oxygen atom efficiently from pyridine
N-oxide to PPh3, in which cooperation between the metal centre
and the NCPO ligand would be expected. Further study on the
application of this unique cooperation to catalysis is now under-
way. Development of cooperative ligands based on N-confused
porphyrin would be also expected in the near future.17
The present work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (22350020, 22655044) from the MEXT.
Notes and references
Fig. 3 HOMO and LUMO of 5 and 6.
‡Crystallographic data 5·2MeOH: C47H37N4O5Re, MW 924.04, tricli-
ˉ
nic, space group P1 (No. 2), a = 11.231(3), b = 13.123(4), c = 14.134(5)
Å, V = 1870.9(10) Å3, Z = 2, T = 123 K, R = 0.0646 (I > 2σ(I)), RW
=
ligand. Such cooperation between the rhenium metal and the
NCPO ligand would be a noticeable example among cooperating
ligands.
0.1473 (all data), GOF on F2 = 0.992 (all data), CCDC reference
number 867528; 6·1/2C6H6: C48H32N4O2Re, MW 882.98, triclinic,
ˉ
space group P1 (No. 2), a = 11.841(6), b = 12.438(7), c = 14.373(7) Å,
V = 1795.6(16) Å3, Z = 2, T = 123 K, R = 0.0432 (I > 2σ(I)), RW
=
The above reaction mechanism was supported by DFT calcu-
lations.† All the calculations were achieved on the corresponding
meso-free derivatives. The HOMO and LUMO of 5 and 6 are
shown in Fig. 3. First of all, both the HOMO and LUMO of 5
and 6 are similar to each other. The HOMO of 6 is exclusively
composed of the NCPO π-orbitals and thus oxidation of 6 would
not occur at the rhenium metal but at the NCPO ligand. Contrast-
ingly, significant contribution of the oxo-rhenium moiety is
observed in the LUMO of 5, which indicates that the reduction
would occur at the oxo-rhenium moiety to give 10. Formation of
6 directly from 5 is unlikely to occur, since trivial contribution
at the C–O bond moiety was observed. Besides, no C–O bond
cleavage has been reported in the reported oxo-NCP metal com-
plexes.13 The rhenium(III) complex 10 is energetically less stable
than the isomeric rhenium(V) complex 6 by 69.2 kcal mol−1 and
no transition state was found between 10 and 6 in DFT calcu-
lations. Hence this transformation is supposed to be fast. The
relative stability for the other possible intermediates is also con-
sistent with the plausible reaction mechanism (see ESI†).
To validate the efficiency of interconversion between 5 and 6,
oxygen atom transport from pyridine N-oxide to PPh3 was exam-
ined with a catalytic amount of 5 or 6.14 Satisfactory, the reaction
proceeded quantitatively at 80 °C for 24 h with 1 mol% of 6
(Scheme 5). The reaction proceeded even in the presence of
0.01 mol% of 6 in 55% yield (TON = 5500). Similarly, the
0.0826 (all data), GOF on F2 = 1.030 (all data), CCDC reference
number 867529.
1 H. Grützmacher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1814.
2 J. W. Whittaker, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2005, 433, 227.
3 (a) R. Noyori, M. Yamakawa and S. Hashiguchi, J. Org. Chem., 2001,
66, 7931; (b) K. Muñiz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 6622;
(c) J. Zhang, G. Leitus, Y. Ben-David and D. Milstein, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 10840; (d) C. Gunanathan, Y. Ben-David and
D. Milstein, Science, 2007, 317, 790.
4 (a) H. Furuta, T. Asano and T. Ogawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
767; (b) P. J. Chmielewski, L. Latos-Grażyński, K. Rachlewicz and
T. Głowiak, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 779.
5 (a) M. Toganoh and H. Furuta, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 937;
(b) P. J. Chmielewski and L. Latos-Grażyński, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2005,
249, 2510.
6 (a) M. Tognaoh, T. Ishizuka and H. Furuta, Chem. Commun., 2004,
2464; (b) M. Toganoh, S. Ikeda and H. Furuta, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46,
10003.
7 P. J. Chmielewski and L. Latos-Grażyński, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2, 1995, 503.
8 (a) M. Toganoh and H. Furuta, Chem. Lett., 2005, 34, 1034;
(b) M. Toganoh, T. Hihara and H. Furuta, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 8182.
9 C. A. Lippert, S. A. Arnstein, C. D. Sherrill and J. D. Soper, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 3879.
10 J. H. Espenson, X. Shan, Y. Wang, R. Huang, W. D. W. Lahti, J. Dixon,
G. Lente, A. Ellern and I. A. Guzei, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 2583.
11 F. H. Allen, O. Kennard, D. G. Watson, L. Brammer, A. G. Orpen and
R. Talor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1987, S1.
12 (a) R. Eisenberg and H. B. Gray, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 9741;
(b) W. Kaim, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 9752.
9156 | Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 9154–9157
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012