acyclic terpenoid subunit is oxidatively converted to the
bis-THF substructure (Scheme 1). In close correlation to
the biosynthesis of polyether antibiotics14 and the presumed
biogenesis of acetogenines15 as well as terpenoid oligo-
THF’s16b one may suspect a polyepoxide cascade cyclization10
pathway (Scheme 1).16
Scheme 1. Possible Biosynthesis of Heronapyrrole C
Figure 1. Structures of heronapyrroles AꢀC.
heterocycles (THFs7 and THPs8) and applications to
natural product synthesis,9 we decided to investigate a
synthetic approach to the bis-THF natural product hero-
napyrrole C. In this particular case, our strategy is
centered on a putative biomimetic polyepoxide cyclization
cascade.10,11
Capon and co-workers originally isolated 0.5 mg of hero-
napyrrole C and were able to assign the overall structure
and the cis-geometry (ROESY) across one of the THF rings
(see Figure 1).5 None of the other stereocenters, neither
absolute nor relative stereochemistry, were established. With
five chiral centers in natural heronapyrrole C one needs to
synthesize up to 32 stereoisomers (or 16 diastereoisomers) to
unambiguously determine the configuration of the natural
product. In order to narrow down this number and select our
initial target stereostructure, we decided to follow a putative
biomimetic pathway. Whereas the timing and manner of the
introduction of the nitro group during heronapyrrole bio-
synthesis may be a matter of some debate,12 other key steps
appear somewhat less speculative. Thus, after polyprenyla-
tion13 of (a potentially peptide bound2) pyrrole system the
On the basis of this biosynthetic scheme and a set of
further assumptions, we derived the structure of the most
likely natural stereoisomer of heronapyrrole C (Scheme 2).
The starting point of this chain of assumptions is the
putative biosynthetic relation of heronapyrrole C to her-
onapyrrole A already suggested by Capon and co-workers.5
Accordingly, the absolute stereochemistry at C7 and C15,
originally determined for heronapyrrole A17 only (see
Figure 1), would be identical in heronapyrrole C (7S,15R;
red in Scheme 2). Moreover, with the hypothesis that the
bis-THF backbone is biosynthetically derived from an
(E,E)-farnesol derivative13 (blue in Scheme 2) via an
epoxide cyclization cascade10 the stereocenter at C8 has to
be S-configured. The relative configuration between C8 and
C11 (cis-THF;5 see Figure 1) results in the secondary center
at C11 to be likewise S-configured (orange in Scheme 2).
The same reasoning as before (E,E-triene precursor) leads
to the S-configuration of the neighboring tertiary center at
C12 (blue in Scheme 2). We therefore propose heronapyr-
role C 3 as depicted in Scheme 2 as the most likely natural
stereoisomer (relative and absolute stereochemistry) and
decided to synthesize this compound.
€
(9) Goksel, H.; Stark, C. B. W. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3433.
(10) Forreviews, see: (a)Koert,U. Synthesis1995, 115. (b)McDonald,
F. E.; Tong, R.; Valentine, J. C.; Bravo, F. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 281.
(c) Vilotijevic, I.; Jamison, T. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5250.
Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 5352.
(11) For selected examples from natural product synthesis, see:
(a) Koert, U.; Wagner, H.; Stein, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 7629.
(b) Lindel, T.; Franck, B. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1995, 36, 9465. (c) Xiong,
Z.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4831. (d) Morimoto, Y.;
Okita, T.; Takaishi, M.; Tanaka, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46,
1132. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 1150. (e) Marshall, J. A.; Hann, R. K.
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6753. (f) Morimoto, Y.; Okita, T.; Kambara, H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2538. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 2576.
(g) Clausen, D. J.; Wan, S.; Floreanicig, P. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 5178. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5284. For examples prior to
1994, see ref 10a.
(12) See, for instance: (a) Ratnyake, A. S.; Haltli, B.; Feng, X.;
Bernan, V. S.; Singh, M. P.; He, H.; Carter, G. T. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71,
1923. (b) Kers, J. A.; Wach, M. J.; Krasnoff, S. B.; Widom, J.; Cameron,
K. D.; Bukhalid, R. A.; Gibson, D. M.; Crane, B. R.; Loria, R. Nature
2004, 429, 79.
(13) (a) Wessjohann, L. A.; Sontag, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 1697. Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1821. (b) Wessjohann, L. A. ;
Sontag, B.; Dessoy, M. A. Organic Chemistry Highlights IV; Schmalz,
H.-G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1999; p 79.
(15) (a) Alali, F. Q.; Liu, X.-X.; McLaughlin, J. L. J. Nat. Prod. 1999,
62, 504. (b) Bermejo, A.; Figadere, B.; Zafra-Polo, M. C.; Barrachina, I.;
Estornell, E.; Cortes, D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 269.
(16) For general reviews on the biosynthesis of oligo-THF and
ꢁ
related natural products, see: (a) Koert, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
ꢀ
Engl. 1995, 34, 298. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 326. (b) Fernandez, J. J.;
Souto, M. L.; Norte, M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 235. (c) Gallimore,
A. R.; Spencer, J. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 44, 4406. Angew.
Chem. 2006, 118, 4514. (d) Gallimore, A. R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26,
266. (e) de Marıa, P. D.; van Gemert, R. W.; Straathof, A. J. J.;
´
(14) (a) Cane, D. E.; Celmer, W. D.; Westley, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1983, 105, 3594. (b) Bhatt, A.; Stark, C. B. W.; Harvey, B. M.;
Gallimore, A. R.; Demydchuk, Y. A.; Spencer, J. B.; Staunton, J.;
Leadlay, P. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7075. Angew. Chem.
2005, 117, 7237. See also ref 16.
Hanefeld, U. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 370. (f) Ueberbacher, B. T.;
Hall, M.; Faber, K. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 337.
(17) The configuration of these chiral centers was assigned using the
Mosher method; see ref 5 for details; see also ref 23.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX