These drawbacks make an alternate approach, radical cou-
pling, an attractive protocol for making substituted quinones
by CÀH functionalization of quinones. The major advan-
tages of radical chemistry such as excellent reactivity, mild
conditions, functional group tolerance, and more atom
economy make the metal-mediated radical strategy attrac-
tive for an ideal chemical synthesis. The radical strategy was
utilized in the preparation of arylated and alkylated qui-
nones from boronic acids10a,b and diazonium species.10c
Oxidative decarboxylation approach by Kochi11a and
Minisci11b was followed for the generation of radicals, which
was used for the functionalization of naphthaquinones with
amino acids.11c The major problems associated with the
Minisci reaction are the modest yields and lack of selectivity.
developed from cyclopropanols. Even though the reaction
of cyclopropanols with electron-deficient alkenes was studied
as a multicomponent reaction,13 their reactivity with quinones
has not been explored until now.
The reaction between 1-phenylcyclopropanol and 1,4-
benzoquinone was explored to find the optimal reaction
conditions, and the results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Screening Experiments
isolated
entry
1
reagent(s)
Mn(OAc)3
solvent
AcOH
time (min) yield (%)
90
95
60
70
52
48
65
61
(2.2 equiv)
Mn(OAc)3
(2.2 equiv)
2
3
4
MeOHÀAcOH
(9:1)
AgNO3 (0.2 equiv)/ CH2Cl2ÀH2O
K2S2O8 (3 equiv) (1:1)
FeSO4 (0.5 equiv)/ CH2Cl2ÀH2O
K2S2O8 (3 equiv)
CAN (2.2 equiv)
(1:1)
Cyclopropanols are versatile compounds which can be a
repertoire for various classes of synthetic molecules such as
azaheterocycles,12a β-substituted ketones,12b allyl chlorides,12c
and other products by virtue of the strain energy associated
with the three-membered ring. After Kulinkovich discovered
that the reaction between esters and Grignard reagents in the
presence of Ti(OPri)4 produced cyclopropanols,15 a plethora
of reactions have started emerging on these synthetically
useful intermediates. The ring opening of cyclopropanols by
the one-electron oxidants such as Mn salts,12a CAN,12b Ag(I)
with persulfate,13 etc. under mild conditions delivers reactive
radical species, β-keto radicals. Though it is possible to
generate such radicals from β-keto acids by oxidative dec-
arboxylation, harsh conditions (high temperature and acidic)
are required to get the desired reaction. Considering the
intrinsic reactivity of these radicals, a milder method is
essential to limit the formation of other potential side products
and also to have a broad substrate scope. On the basis of the
above facts, we envisioned that a mild method can be
5
6
MeOH
60
60
traces
traces
FeSO4 (0.5 equiv)/ MeOHÀH2O
TBHP (3 equiv)
7
AgNO3 (0.2 equiv)/ ACN
MnO2 (3 equiv)
60
30
Although Mn(OAc)3 was successful in bringing the desired
conversion, its success is marred with a slower reaction and
considerable amounts of disubstitution. K2S2O8 reacted
rapidly to produce the monosubstituted product in the
presence of catalytic amounts of AgNO3 as well as FeSO4,
but AgNO3 looked superior because of short reaction time
and better yield. The other oxidants, CAN and TBHP,
produced a mixture of side products along with traces of
desired product. MnO2 delivered a lower yield and was found
to be less efficient for this reaction. After the study of the
results from the screening experiments, AgNO3 (20 mol %)
and K2S2O8 (3 equiv) in DCMÀH2O (1:1, v/v) was found to
be the best condition to investigate the further scope of the
reaction.
(10) (a) Fujiwara, Y.; Domingo, V.; Seiple, I. B.; Gianatassio, R.; Bel,
M. D.; Baran, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3292–3295. (b) Wang,
J.; Wang, S.; Wang, G.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.-Q. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
11769–11771. (c) Lamblin, M.; Naturale, G.; Dessolin, J.; Felpin, F.-X.
Synlett 2012, 23, 1621–162.
The required cyclopropanols were prepared in good
yields by the Kulinkovich reaction,15 as per Scheme 1.
(11) (a) Anderson, J. M.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92,
1651–1959. (b) Minisci, F.; Vismara, E.; Fontana, F.; Morini, G.;
Serravalle, M.; Giordana, C. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4411–4416. (c)
Commandeur, C.; Chalumeau, C.; Dessolin, J.; Laguerre, M. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 3045–3052.
Scheme 1. Preparation of Cyclopropanols
(12) (a) Wang, Y.-F.; Chiba, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12570–
12572. (b) Jiao, J.; Nguyen, L. X.; Patterson, D. R.; Flowers, R. A. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 1323–1326. (c) Kulinkovich, O. G.; Kozyrkov, Y. Y.; Bekish, A. V.;
Matiushenkov, E. A.; Lysenko, I. L. Synthesis 2005, 1713–1717.
(15) (a) Kulinkovich, O. G.; Sviridov, S. V.; Vasilevski, D. A.;
Pritytskaya, T. S. J. Org. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.) 1989, 25, 2027.
(b) Kulinkovich, O. G.; Meijer, A. D. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2789.
(13) Chiba, S.; Cao, Z.; Bialy, S. A. A. E.; Narasaka, K. Chem. Lett.
2006, 18–19.
A wide range of cyclopropanols were reacted with 1,4-
benzoquinone under the optimized conditions, and the
results are shown in Figure 1.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX