Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i. TBAF, THF, 99%; ii. MsCl, Et3N,
DMAP, CH2Cl2, 95%; iii. KSAc, DMF, 99%; iv. NBS, AgNO3, acetone,
98%; v. KMnO4, NaHCO3, MgSO4, aq. MeOH, 71%; vi. N2H4?H2O,
MeOH, 88%.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i. TBDPS-Cl, imidazole, DMF, 99%;
ii. BnBr, NaH, DMF, 87%; iii. NBS, aq. acetone, 95%; iv. Dess–Martin
periodinane, pyridine, CH2Cl2, 69%; v. TMSCMCH, n-BuLi, CeCl3?7H2O,
THF, 278 uC to rt, 96%; vi. Et3SiH, TMSOTf, CH2Cl2, 74%; vii. NaOH,
MeOH, CH2Cl2, 100%; viii. NBS, AgNO3, acetone, 98%; ix. KMnO4,
NaHCO3, MgSO4, aq. MeOH, 84%; x. HF?py, THF, 278 uC to rt, 77%.
In conclusion, we have carried out the first synthesis of the
tagetitoxin skeleton, by unmasking of a thiol in the presence of an
electrophilic a-ketoester, triggering spontaneous cyclisation to a
hemithioacetal. Efforts towards synthesis of the fully functionalised
tagetitoxin structure are under way and will be reported in due
course.
We thank EPSRC and UCL for financial support of this work.
Phenyl 1-thio-b-D-glucopyranoside (10) was converted to the
fully protected analogue 1111 before NBS-promoted hydrolysis of
the thioglycoside linkage (Scheme 2). Oxidation to the d-lactone 12
was accomplished using Dess–Martin periodinane. Cerium-
mediated addition of trimethylsilylacetylene followed by deox-
ygenation and desilylation then afforded terminal alkyne 14.
Bromination to give 15 was followed by oxidation with potassium
permanganate in aqueous methanol12 to yield a-ketoester 16.
On cleavage of the silyl ether with TBAF, concomitant
elimination of the 2-benzyloxy group (glucose numbering) to form
an enol ether was observed. However, when silyl ether 16 was
treated with HF–pyridine, the sole product was tricyclic acetal 17,
in which not only the silyl ether but also the 3- and 4-benzyl ethers
had been cleaved, and an acetal had formed between the ketone
and the 3- and 6-OH groups.
Notes and references
{ Data for 21: [a]1D7 +3.1 (c 1.07 in EtOH); nmax/cm21 (film) 3445 (OH),
2928 (CH), 1736 (CLO); dH (500 MHz, C6D6) 7.38–6.99 (15H, m, ArH),
5.01 (1H, d, J 11.3), 4.92 (1H, d, J 11.3), 4.82 (1H, d, J 11.6), 4.75 (1H, d, J
11.6) and 4.65 (1H, d, J 12.0, 5 of PhCH2), 4.43 (1H, dd, J 9.3, 2.8, H-2),
4.39 (1H, J 12.0, 1 of PhCH2), 4.36 (1H, br d, J 2.8, H-1), 4.22 (1H, t, J 9.4,
H-3), 4.19 (1H, td, J 3.6, 1.9, H-5), 4.11 (1H, s, OH), 4.03 (1H, dd, J 9.6,
3.7, H-4), 3.30 (1H, dd, J 13.4, 3.6, 1 of CH2S), 3.24 (3H, s, CH3), 1.57 (1H,
br d, J 13.4, 1 of CH2S); dC (125 MHz, C6D6) 173.4 (CLO), 139.1, 138.9
and 138.6 (3 6 aromatic C), 82.2 (C-3), 80.0 (C-4), 79.8 (C-2), 79.5 (C-1),
75.0 (PhCH2), 73.3 (C-5), 73.2 (PhCH2), 72.4 (PhCH2), 71.9 (SCOH), 52.5
(OCH3), 40.9 (C-6), other aromatic carbons obscured by solvent; m/z
(FAB+) 559 (MNa+, 2%), 326 (21), 199 (26), 176 (100); HRMS (FAB+)
found 559.1784; C30H32O6SNa (MNa+) requires 559.1766.
1 R. E. Mitchell and R. D. Durbin, Physiol. Plant Pathol., 1981, 18,
157–168.
Formation of the tricyclic acetal 17 precluded introduction of a
sulfur atom at C6, but alteration of the order of steps allowed
completion of the synthesis of the tagetitoxin skeleton; thus double
desilylation of 13 could be achieved with TBAF to give primary
alcohol 18 (Scheme 3). Activation as the mesylate was followed by
displacement with potassium thioacetate, and bromination of the
alkyne afforded 19. Oxidation as for compound 15 gave the
a-ketoester 20, and removal of the S-acetyl protecting group using
hydrazine hydrate in methanol led directly to the bicyclic
hemithioacetal 21.
2 D. E. Mathews and R. D. Durbin, J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265, 493–498.
3 T. H. Steinberg, D. E. Mathews, R. D. Durbin and R. R. Burgess,
J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265, 499–505; for a recently identified specific
inhibitor of RNA polymerase III, see L. P. Wu, J. Pan, V. Thoroddsen,
D. R. Wysong, R. K. Blackman, C. E. Bulawa, A. E. Gould,
T. D. Ocain, L. R. Dick, P. Errada, P. K. Dorr, T. Parkinson, T. Wood,
D. Kornitzer, Z. Weissman, I. M. Willis and K. McGovern, Eukaryotic
Cell, 2003, 2, 256–264.
4 D. G. Vassylyev, V. Svetlov, M. N. Vassylyeva, A. Perederina,
N. Igarashi, N. Matsugaki, S. Wakatsuki and I. Artsimovitch, Nat.
Struct. Mol. Biol., 2005, 12, 1086–1093.
5 R. E. Mitchell and R. D. Durbin, Phytochemistry, 1983, 22, 1425–1428.
6 R. E. Mitchell, J. M. Coddington and H. Young, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1989, 30, 501–504.
7 (a) T. Sammakia, T. B. Hurley, D. M. Sammond, R. S. Smith,
S. B. Sobolov and T. R. Oeschger, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37,
4427–4430; (b) B. R. Dent, R. H. Furneaux, G. J. Gainsford and
G. P. Lynch, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 6977–6996.
8 (a) M. Ioannou, M. J. Porter and F. Saez, Chem. Commun., 2002,
346–347; (b) M. Ioannou, M. J. Porter and F. Saez, Tetrahedron, 2005,
61, 43–50.
The structure of 21 was confirmed by mass spectrometry and
NMR;{ in particular, an HMBC correlation was observed
between the hemithioacetal carbon at 71.9 ppm and one of the
CH2S protons at 1.57 ppm. Vicinal coupling constants of 9.3 and
9.6 Hz between the pairs of CHOBn protons indicated a boat
conformation for the tetrahydropyran ring, as depicted in 21. The
hemithioacetal was obtained as a single stereoisomer, although the
configuration of this centre was not determined.
1198 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 1197–1199
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006