7454
Y. M. Song et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 7451–7455
Table 2
inhibition by the synthesized compounds was examined.
4-Hydroxyphenyl derivatives suppressed mushroom tyrosinase
activity more effectively than the other derivatives including 2,4-
dihydroxyphenyl, 2-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl and 2-hydroxy-4-
methoxyphenyl. 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylanalogssignificantly
reduced the antityrosinase effect. Generally, 3,5-dihydroxyphenyl
and 3,5-dimethoxyphenyl analogs were more potent tyrosinase
inhibitors than 2,5-dimethoxyphenyl analogs. Azo-resveratrol (5)
exhibited the most potent mushroom tyrosinase inhibition. The
IC50 value of azo-resveratrol was comparable to that of resveratrol.
Higher LogP value of azo-resveratrol compared with resveratrol
might provide merit superior to resveratrol as a lead compound for
the development of whitening agents and pharmaceutical drugs to
treat hyperpigmentation. Synthetic methodology and structure-
activity relationships of azo-resveratrol (5), azo-oxyresveratrol (9)
and their analogs will be extensively utilized in designing and syn-
thesizing potent tyrosinase inhibitors.
Inhibitory effects of compound 4, azo-resveratrol (5) and resveratrol on mushroom
tyrosinase activity
a
b
Compound
Conc.
(lM) Tyrosinase inhibition (%) IC50 (lM)
4
5.0
20.0
50.0
80.0
8.40 0.70
46.04 0.82
56.31 0.51
61.41 0.72
7.60 1.09
44.29 1.13
72.75 1.60
13.67 4.24
16.26 0.75
27.09 7.79
38.05 1.84
47.29 1.07
47.78 1.30
50.2 1.01
Azo-resveratrol (5) 15.0
36.28 0.72
26.63 0.55
30.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Resveratrol
5.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
a
Values represent means S.E. of three experiments.
50% inhibitory concentration.
b
Acknowledgment
41.46% inhibition at 50 lM. Azo-resveratrol (5) exerted the most
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of
Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No.
2009-0083538).
potent inhibitory activity against mushroom tyrosinase, with
72.75% inhibition at the same concentration. The inhibitory
activities decreased in the order of 5 > 4 > 8 > 9 > 13 > 6, 15 > 7,
16. These results suggest that 3,5-dimethoxyphenyl and 3,5-
dihydroxyphenyl derivatives are superior to 2,5-dimethoxy
derivatives in the inhibition of tyrosinase (4, 5, 8 and 9 vs 13, 15
and 16) and that 4-hydroxyphenyl is an essential group for potent
inhibitory activity (4 and 5). It is worthy to note that introduction
of the second substituent into the 4-hydroxyphenyl moiety
decreases mushroom tyrosinase inhibition, depending on the
substituent and position. Insertion of a methoxy group into the
3-position dramatically diminished the tyrosinase inhibitory effect
(7 and 16). Introduction of a methoxy group into the 2-position (6)
lagged behind introduction into the 3-position in decreasing order
of inhibitory potency. It is also notable that 4-hydroxyphenyl azo
compounds exhibited more significant inhibitory activity against
mushroom tyrosinase than 2,4-dihydroxyphenyl azo compounds
(5 vs 9 and 4 vs 8). Interestingly, this result is contrary to that
observed in phenyl-benzo[d]thiazole, phenyl-thiazolidine-4-car-
boxylic acid and phenyl-pyrrolidine-2,5-dione analogs, in which
2,4-dihydroxyphenyl derivatives exhibited higher mushroom
tyrosinase inhibition than 4-hydroxyphenyl derivatives.29 The
bioactivities of compounds 4 and 5 were investigated in greater de-
tail. As depicted in Table 2, resveratrol, a positive control, inhibited
mushroom tyrosinase activity in a concentration-dependent man-
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Baur, J. A.; Sinclair, D. A. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2006, 5, 493; (b) Saiko, P.;
Szakmary, A.; Jaeger, W.; Szekere, T. Mutat. Res. 2008, 658, 68.
2. Pandey, K. B.; Rizvi, S. I. Arabian J. Chem. 2011, 4, 293.
3. Joseph, J. A.; Fisher, D. R.; Cheng, V.; Rimando, A. M.; Shukitt-Hale, B. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10544.
4. Gao, Z. B.; Chen, X. Q.; Hu, G. Y. Brain Res. 2006, 1111, 41.
5. Jung, J.-C.; Lim, E.; Lee, Y.; Kang, J.-M.; Kim, H.; Jang, S.; Oh, S.; Jung, M. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 3166.
6. (a) Stojanovic, S.; Brede, O. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 757; (b) Stojanovic,
S.; Sprinz, H.; Brede, O. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 391, 79.
7. Calderone, V.; Martelli, A.; Testai, L.; Martinotti, E.; Breschi, M. C. Naunyn
Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2007, 375, 73.
8. Gojkovic-Bukarica, L.; Novakovic, A.; Kanjuh, V.; Bumbasirevic, M.; Lesic, A.;
Heinle, H. A. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2008, 108, 124.
9. Bertini, S.; Calderone, V.; Carboni, I.; Maffei, R.; Martelli, A.; Martinelli, A.;
Minutolo, F.; Rajabi, M.; Testai, L.; Tuccinardi, T.; Ghidoni, R.; Macchia, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 6715.
10. Hanzlikova, I.; Melzoch, K.; Filip, V.; Smidrkal, J.; Buckiova, D. Czech. J. Food Sci.
2000, 18, 212.
11. Stivala, L. A.; Savio, M.; Carafoli, F.; Perucca, P.; Bianchi, L.; Maga, G.; Forti, L.;
Pagnoni, U. M.; Albini, A.; Prosperi, E.; Vannini, V. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276,
22586.
12. Cai, Y.-J.; Wei, Q.-Y.; Fang, J.-G.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.-L.; Wyche, J. H.; Han, Z.
Anticaner Res. 2004, 24, 999.
13. Song, S.; Lee, H.; Jin, Y.; Ha, Y. M.; Bae, S.; Chung, H. Y.; Suh, H. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 461.
14. Flurkey, A.; Cooksey, J.; Reddy, A.; Spoonmore, K.; Rescigno, A.; Inlow, J.;
Flurkey, W. H. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4760.
15. (a) Perez-Gilabert, M.; Garcia-Carmona, F. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
2001, 285, 257; (b) Whitaker, J. R. Polyphenol Oxidase. In Food Enzyme:
Structure and Mechanism; Wong, D. W. S., Ed.; Chapman & Hall: New York,
1995; pp 271–307.
16. (a) Hunger, K.; Wiley, J. Industrial Dyes Chemistry Properties Applications; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2003; (b) Latif, A.; Noor, S.; Sharif, Q. M.; Najeebullah, M. J.
Chem. Soc. Pak. 2010, 32, 115.
17. (a) Bernaerts, K. V.; Du Prez, F. E. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 671; (b) Athey, R. D.
J. Eur. Coat. 1998, 3, 146.
18. (a) Sandborn, W. J.; Hanauer, S. B. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 17, 29; (b)
Hoult, J. R. S. Drugs 1986, 32, 18.
ner. The data showed that compound 4 (IC50 = 50.20 1.00
2-fold less potent than resveratrol (IC50 = 26.63 0.55 M) as an
inhibitors of mushroom tyrosinase. However, azo-resveratrol (5,
IC50 = 36.28 0.72 M) exhibited almost equipotent tyrosinase
lM) is
l
l
inhibitory activity to resveratrol. Compounds 4 and 5 displayed
dose-dependent inhibition of mushroom tyrosinase. Using the
Chemdraw Ultra 10.0 program, the LogP values for resveratrol
and azo-resveratrol are 3.03 and 3.30, respectively, suggesting that
azo-resveratrol (5)30 may be easily absorbed into skin than resve-
ratrol if the compounds are used as an external application for
treatment of various diseases associated with hyperpigmentation.
Research on the antioxidant, anti-aging, anti-inflammation and
anticancer activities of azo-resveratrol, azo-oxyresveratrol30 and
their analogs is currently underway and the results will be
presented in due course.
In summary, on the basis of structures of resveratrol and oxyres-
veratrol that show a variety of biological activities, azo-resveratrol,
azo-oxyresveratrol and their analogs were first synthesized using a
modified Curtius rearrangement and diazotization followed by a
coupling reaction with various phenolic compounds. Tyrosinase
19. Browing, C. H.; Cohen, J. B.; Ellingworth, S.; Gulbransen, R. J. Storage 1926, 100.
20. Ginni, S.; Karnawat, R.; Sharma, I. K.; Verma, P. S. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Tech.
2011, 2, 332.
21. (a) Farines, V.; Monje, M.-C.; Telo, J. P.; Hnawia, E.; Sauvain, M.; Nepveu, F. Anal.
Chim. Acta 2004, 513, 103; (b) Matsuoka, A.; Takeshita, K.; Furuta, A.; Ozaki, M.;
Fukuhara, K.; Miyata, N. Mutat. Res. 2002, 521, 29.