Figure 1. (A) Type I ARC; (B) Type II ARC.
prototype, orginally reported by Wadsworth and Emmons,9
entails the reaction of stabilized phosphonate anions with
epoxides to form cyclopropanes (Figure 2A), a reaction
process that typically requires both a high temperature and
prolonged reaction time. Independent studies by Singh,11
Merschaert,12 and Ghirardelli5 suggested that the reaction
proceeds through a mechanism similar to what we now
term Type I ARC, involving a stepwise “Brook-like” re-
arrangement involving initial explusion of an ethoxide
anion. Readdition of the ethoxide and completion of
the CfO phosphorus migration furnishes a stabilized
anion that undergoes intramolecular displacement of the
diethoxyphosphate to generate the trans cyclopropane.
More recently, Krawczyk et al.13 reported that the rear-
ranged adduct 9, obtained by addition of a nucleophile to
the aldehyde of bifunctional phosphonate linchpin 8
(Figure 2B), after isolation and deprotonation, can under-
go intramolecular cyclization to form a cyclopropane ring.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the only example of
what is a formal Type II phorphorus “ARC-like” process,
albeit achieved in a stepwise fashion.
Figure 2. Phosphorus-Brook rearrangement.
To explore this scenario, we examined the reaction of
alcohol 11 possessing a β-diethoxyphosphonate group, en-
visioned to furnish two-component adduct 13 (Figure 2C).
If successful, we would turn to a three-component Type II
ARC process involving generation of the corresponding
oxyanion by nucleophilic addition to aldehyde 12.
To this end, alcohol 11 was treated with potassium
hexamethyldisilazide (KHMDS), followed by addition of
allyl bromide, initially employing tetrahydrofuran (THF),
dichloroethane(DCE), and/ordimethylformamide(DMF)
as solvent systems at À78 °C. Under these conditions, only
the phosphorus-Brook rearranged product 15 was observed
(Table 1, entries 1À3). However, upon addition of an in-
creasing amount of hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA),
employing first THF and then DMF as the solvent system
with allyl bromide as the electrophile, the two component
adduct 14 was observed, in conjunction with diallylated
adduct 17, allylated phosphacycle 16, and the phosphorus-
Brook product 15 (Table 1, entries 4À6).
Given that ring closure has been implicated as the rate-
determing step in the WadsworthÀEmmons cyclopropa-
nation reaction,9 the possibility of performing the phos-
phorus-Brook rearrangement at lower temperature might
permit the derived anion to react with an exogenous
electrophile, thus expanding the scope of the ARC tactic
(Figure 2C).
Further reaction optimization was guided by the mech-
anistic hypothesis outlined in Figure 3, which accounts for
the formation of 14 as well as byproducts 15, 16, and 17.
Specifically, initial deprotonation of 11 was envisioned to
lead to phosphacycle 18, which in the presence of excess
base, could undergo deprotonation at the carbon bearing
the phosphonate. Alkylation with allyl bromide would
lead to 16. Alternatively, in the presence of only 1.0 equiv
of KHMDS, the liberated alkoxide and phosphacycle 18,
presumably in equilibrium with carbanion A, would lead
to alkylation with allyl bromide to furnish the Type II
(9) Wadsworth, W. S.; Emmons, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83,
1733.
(10) Bray, C. D.; de Faveri, G. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4652 and
references cited therein.
(11) Singh, A. K.; Rao, M. N.; Simpson, J. H.; Li, W.-S.; Thornton,
J. E.; Kuehner, D. E.; Kacsur, D. J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 618.
(12) Delhaye, L.; Merschaert, A.; Delbeke, P.; Brione, W. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 689.
(13) Krawczyk, H.; Wasek, K.; Kedzia, J.; Wojciechowski, J.; Wolf,
W. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 308.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4471